Thursday, December 29, 2011

I KNEW IT! The UFO "Majestic" documents fake, but......

http://www.michaelsheiser.com/MJ%20Test%20article.pdf

This article shows reasons to dismiss the whole Majestic or MJ12
story, or at least the documents that are involved.

Another reason to reject them, is that Robert and/or Ryan Wood,
the recipients of the ton of extra MJ12 files, submitted them to, of
all people, Michael Aquino ex of the Army, for evaluation as a
psychological warfare expert.

Aren't there other psywar experts available? Why this guy?
(Google temple of set and presidio if you want to know more
about him.)

Aquino's conclusion was that they were not a product of a psyop.

And if that sonofabitch satanist closet nazi says they are not
a product of a psyop, then they are the product of a psyop of some
sort.

I have concluded some time ago that these documents were
at least dubious, but represented an effort to redirect attention
off something real. Disinformation functions primarily to
either put you on a wrong trail, or off a right trail you were on,
and usually consists of a lot of truth.

At the time the papers came out, all parties listed were dead. There
was no indication of any provision for continuation of the group
into another generation of replacements. IF such a group had
existed, this is exactly the impression you would want people
to have.

One name that would fit the profile of an MJ12 member, was
not on that list - Clyde Tombaugh, who was still alive when
they were published, who had discovered The Black Knight
humongous satellite in a polar orbit in the late 1950s when
no one had the ability to put anything that large in orbit, and
no one had the ability to anything into a polar orbit.

When Tombaugh did die, in Las Crusces, NM, his widow
said government people came and took all his papers.

I think we can safely assume that the new papers, which do
as I recall mention provision for continuing the organization,
will only serve to put researchers on wrong tracks trying
to investigate, contact and harass the alleged members, and
nose around in all the wrong stuff, while any actual replacers
go unnoticed.

This study Heiser describes, leaves The Twining Memo as
legitimate, which oddly enough in Sept. 23 AD 1947,
complains of "The lack of physical evidence in the shape 
of crash recovered exhibits which would undeniably 
prove the existence of these subjects."
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/49ufo_files/03files/mildoc001.html

Since the Roswell wreckage was taken to Wright Patterson,
perhaps something was going on even then that was off the
official radar, and the public announcement of the weather
balloon story was as much to deceive superiors in the normal
chain of command as anyone else.
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/164997/mayan-2012-apocalypse-prediction-might-have-been-mistranslated/

Mayan calendar doesn't say anything about an end of the world,
just that the calendar ends in 2012 and restarts.

Which of course means that whatever catastrophe might happen,
involving nibiru, has nothing to do with this, and probably won't
happen in 2012. My best guess, and even that of Marshall
Masters (dupe of the Kolbrin Bible fraud an obvious 19th
century philosophical scam to judge by the content), is that at
minimum it won't hit till 2013.

Jacco Van der Woorp on Masters' research crew, has somehow
concluded that Nibiru was parallel (since below the ecliptic) to
Jupiter I think it was (or Saturn?) in 2009. My guess is, it is not
what pulls Uranus and Neptune down a bit, that is probably
something else out there in a permanent distant relationship to
the sun, maybe they orbit a shared center of gravity or something
like that, and this thing is either a new capture or does an orbit
around the sun and the other thing, otherwise we'd see it more
often.

An earlier post regarding the disaster in AD 536, this is now
complicated by the fact that this was also the time of Justinian's
Plague, and flying bronze shields were seen, and dark cloaked
people also.

In the Middle Ages at the time of the Black Death, hooded
cloaked figures were seen in fields, with long sticks making
reaping motions, but not cutting the wheat. The Grim Reaper
dates from these, which one interesting video suggests were aliens
spraying a pathogen.

The c. 200 BC splatter of asteroids across northern Europe
and Russia still remain as a definite celestial event, however,
like we went through something's debris field.

Monday, December 26, 2011

contra neo Confederates: South Carolina's declaration of secession from the USA shows slavery the sole motive

So much for the claim that the Southen secession that caused the American Civil War was not about slavery. Sure there are plenty of references to the Constitution and earlier order and failure to abide by that, but all the specifics of those violations of the Constitutional rights of the self described "slaveholding states" were without exception, regarding slaves. 
This is regarding South Carolina's secession, of course, and each of the slaveholding states had their own declaration of secession, but this will give you and idea. 
Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union
The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.
And now the State of South Carolina having resumed her separate and equal place among nations, deems it due to herself, to the remaining United States of America, and to the nations of the world, that she should declare the immediate causes which have led to this act.
In the year 1765, that portion of the British Empire embracing Great Britain, undertook to make laws for the government of that portion composed of the thirteen American Colonies. A struggle for the right of self-government ensued, which resulted, on the 4th of July, 1776, in a Declaration, by the Colonies, "that they are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; and that, as free and independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do."
They further solemnly declared that whenever any "form of government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government." Deeming the Government of Great Britain to have become destructive of these ends, they declared that the Colonies "are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved."
In pursuance of this Declaration of Independence, each of the thirteen States proceeded to exercise its separate sovereignty; adopted for itself a Constitution, and appointed officers for the administration of government in all its departments-- Legislative, Executive and Judicial. For purposes of defense, they united their arms and their counsels; and, in 1778, they entered into a League known as the Articles of Confederation, whereby they agreed to entrust the administration of their external relations to a common agent, known as the Congress of the United States, expressly declaring, in the first Article "that each State retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right which is not, by this Confederation, expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled."
Under this Confederation the war of the Revolution was carried on, and on the 3rd of September, 1783, the contest ended, and a definite Treaty was signed by Great Britain, in which she acknowledged the independence of the Colonies in the following terms: "ARTICLE 1-- His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that he treats with them as such; and for himself, his heirs and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof."
Thus were established the two great principles asserted by the Colonies, namely: the right of a State to govern itself; and the right of a people to abolish a Government when it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was instituted. And concurrent with the establishment of these principles, was the fact, that each Colony became and was recognized by the mother Country a FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE.
In 1787, Deputies were appointed by the States to revise the Articles of Confederation, and on 17th September, 1787, these Deputies recommended for the adoption of the States, the Articles of Union, known as the Constitution of the United States.
The parties to whom this Constitution was submitted, were the several sovereign States; they were to agree or disagree, and when nine of them agreed the compact was to take effect among those concurring; and the General Government, as the common agent, was then invested with their authority.
If only nine of the thirteen States had concurred, the other four would have remained as they then were-- separate, sovereign States, independent of any of the provisions of the Constitution. In fact, two of the States did not accede to the Constitution until long after it had gone into operation among the other eleven; and during that interval, they each exercised the functions of an independent nation.
By this Constitution, certain duties were imposed upon the several States, and the exercise of certain of their powers was restrained, which necessarily implied their continued existence as sovereign States. But to remove all doubt, an amendment was added, which declared that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people. On the 23d May , 1788, South Carolina, by a Convention of her People, passed an Ordinance assenting to this Constitution, and afterwards altered her own Constitution, to conform herself to the obligations she had undertaken.
Thus was established, by compact between the States, a Government with definite objects and powers, limited to the express words of the grant. This limitation left the whole remaining mass of power subject to the clause reserving it to the States or to the people, and rendered unnecessary any specification of reserved rights.
We hold that the Government thus established is subject to the two great principles asserted in the Declaration of Independence; and we hold further, that the mode of its formation subjects it to a third fundamental principle, namely: the law of compact. We maintain that in every compact between two or more parties, the obligation is mutual; that the failure of one of the contracting parties to perform a material part of the agreement, entirely releases the obligation of the other; and that where no arbiter is provided, each party is remitted to his own judgment to determine the fact of failure, with all its consequences.
In the present case, that fact is established with certainty. We assert that fourteen of the States have deliberately refused, for years past, to fulfill their constitutional obligations, and we refer to their own Statutes for the proof.
The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."
This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River.
The same article of the Constitution stipulates also for rendition by the several States of fugitives from justice from the other States.
The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.
The ends for which the Constitution was framed are declared by itself to be "to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."
These ends it endeavored to accomplish by a Federal Government, in which each State was recognized as an equal, and had separate control over its own institutions. The right of property in slaves was recognized by giving to free persons distinct political rights, by giving them the right to represent, and burthening them with direct taxes for three-fifths of their slaves; by authorizing the importation of slaves for twenty years; and by stipulating for the rendition of fugitives from labor.
We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.
For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the forms of the Constitution, a sectional party has found within that Articleestablishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.
This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety.
On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.
The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.
Sectional interest and animosity will deepen the irritation, and all hope of remedy is rendered vain, by the fact that public opinion at the North has invested a great political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief.
We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved, and that the State of South Carolina has resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent State; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.
Adopted December 24, 1860
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp  Georgia, slavery a major issue and some others.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp  Mississippi announced their position was thoroughly identified with slavery.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_texsec.asp Slavery the second issue, some more serious complaints of failure of the fed to protect them despite demands and funding to do so against Indians and Mexican bandits.

Pyramid energy - hmmmmm....

Reviewing various speculations presented as absolute
fact, regarding pyramid energy and the world grid and
ley lines, a recurring theme is that these were used -
when functional - to get energy for communications
and such like modern purposes. Anachronistic thinking
of the sort that reads modern motivations into the past.

The past was characterized by elites ruling the masses,
often with deception and lies and false miracles. Various
pagan temples had "gods" that moved and spoke, and
after the Christian takeover and demolition of such,
the mechanical devices inside these idols were found
and displayed.

Sure, these things were just puppets and crude robots.
Things that today are mere toys and work tools. But in
those days, no one knew about this but a very few, who
used the information and technology to keep the
masses cowed with awe of the priesthoods.

Whatever communications were in play, it was elite to
elite, not for the common man or even for the merchants
and so forth. It was strictly to promote the power and
status of a very few. Probably not even most kings knew
of this.

It was a major scam. Sure, technology advanced for the
time, but used for evil. Long ago looking at a display and
plaque with lecture on it, in The Rosicrucian Egyptian
Museum in San Jose, CA, I noticed this angle, the wise
elite few ruling the masses.

The Rosicrucians and others now recruit, by offering
this knowledge (usually cobbled together from various
sources and presented as Egyptian or whatever), once
reserved to the few to those among the many who will
pay out to get it, appealing to pride, ambition, greed,
power and status lust even if only to be experienced
as one who secretly knows,  and has a secret status
his neighbors don't know about, so he can secretly feel
superior, however pragmatically inferior, idiotic and
generally unemployable he may be. A ludicrous picture
of this is presented by one writer on the subject, an
incompetent slob growing poorer for the money paid
out for sloppy information and promotion with special
titles and stuff, who feels superior to the neighbors
while they look askance at him, a mess.

So in all liklihood, this technology in "Atlantean"
times or pre Flood civilization, whatever practical use
it might have been put to, was primarily in play to keep
people impressed with lying signs and wonders and
false miracles to keep the pagan cults going.

That doesn't mean this harnessing of energy is demonic
in nature, but it does mean it has a bad pedigree,
nothing to be in awe of, any more than you grovel in
awe at the sight of a battery and wires making a light
bulb glow. Though you might wisely grovel in awe
of the Creator YHWH Who made such things possible
and gave us the brains and skills to find it.

But be careful of Tesla. However well intentioned, he
seems to have been under some kind of influence at
times, and some of his stuff is primarily good for figuring
out how to blow yourself up and take a lot of people
with you. Usually this is in the patents you don't hear
much about. HAARP technology is based on several of
his patents, for instance.

Sunday, December 25, 2011

List of 19th Century UFOs

I don't think we can blame all these on 20th century
human technology or whatever. Crashes like the one
described in the other post rule out demons at least
for that one (though possible involvement of pilots
with demons is another matter).

Of interest also is an earlier Japanese scroll, describing
a woman in a crashed or landed round flying thing,
with strange hieroglyphics similar to one reported by
abductees, and she had a box in her hands. This
device is reported by abductees, and used to be kept
out of published information by researchers, to keep
it as a test for legitimacy of reports.

Confirmation of a theory of mine about disguised spacecraft

http://www.miqel.com/reading_library/archived_stories/1800s-unknown-crash.html

This story relates to a meteor crash that really tore up the ground,
in 1865 or 1864 not sure what they mean by "last September."

when the trapper who relate story saw the thing, he described it
as a stone, that had compartments, a dark liquid, and hieroglyphics.

readers may recall that I speculated that some asteroids out there
are space bases either hollowed out and presumabley reinforced
and equipped asteroids or more likely bult from the ground up
so to speak, with an exterior that is somewhat self repairing or
the internal layers are, and the exterior will take impacts and not
transfer the force to the interior. This material would naturally
resemble an irregular rocky surface, and perhaps might be
deliberately made to look this way for reasons of disguise.

Friday, December 23, 2011

The Supposed Horrible Plan Secret Document

I have skimmed through the document linked on Alex Jones' site and
real-agenda that supposedly shows how FEMA is going to classify
the American public as the enemy, and I don't see any sign of this sort
of thing. Keeping order in a disaster situation is not treating the
American public as the enemy, except that segment that consists of
individuals and gangs of all races, that is the enemy to the American
public whenever it can be.

What are these people screaming about? This is mostly just a typical
government job description and contract seeking stuff, boring, and
all it shows is they expect something major enough to get ready.

This seems silly to me. The Constitution specifies action against
sedition and public disorder. What is the problem? (The problem
in part is that these people don't read the Constitution that carefully,
and don't want anyone telling them what to do, and guess what,
most of what some object to like taxes and driver's licenses and
stuff like that, is what they would eventually have to get around to
doing, should they create or get the chaos they want and install
themselves in power, and then have to reinvent the wheel, after
enough deaths on the road and from disease and whatnot, situations
that brought these laws on in the first place, and enough people
notice the pro active safety laws in the Bible that validate safety
laws and certification of competence to operate vehicles, use
weapons, etc.

Justina

Merry Christmas and a safe and Godly New Year

Here is a link to the Encyclical of Greek Orthodox Archdiocese
of America Archbishop Demetrios for the Feast of the Nativity
of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.


Saturday, December 10, 2011

This Guy Says It Very Well

(from comments on Constance Cumbey's blog.)


Maybe in calling for financial regulation I *have* contradicted what you call a tenet of the republican rightwing gospel. But I'm not a Republican - I'm British. I am aware that I have more in common with the Right than the Left, but I try to think by biblical categories that are 10 times older than notions of Left and Right.

Mosaic Law had free markets in goods but regulated markets in labour, money and land/property. A man was guaranteed food if he worked (ie, works his land) but there was no social security system - although charity was regarded as a duty.

God is wiser than man, so how much of that can we replicate today? Unless we de-industrialise, dissolve property ownership and and share all land out equitably (which I am not advocating) then we cannot get back to a system whereby a man is guaranteed food for work AND there is no social security system. It's one or the other. Which way to go is the Right/Left dilemma of our time.

But there is no reason not to have God's way, of free markets in goods and regulated markets in money. That is why I said what I did. http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11772087&postID=4058748648854562139

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Crust upheaval and rupture the cause of the Japanese Tsunami

San Francisco - The March 2011 megaquake off the coast of Japan opened up fissures as wide as 6 feet (3 meters) in the seafloor, a new study finds. 

.........
On a previous seafloor survey in 2006, the seafloor was covered by sediment, with many sea anemone thriving. No fissures were observed.

Approximately 10,500-to-17,500-feet (3,200-to-5,350-meters) below the ocean's surface, the researchers saw open fissures in "many places," Tsuji said. They ranged from around 3-to-6-feet (around 1-to-3-meters) across, though the researchers couldn't measure how deep these new cracks extended.

By combining their direct observations with seismic surveys of the seafloor, the researchers uncovered a series of complex faults around the zone where the continental crust off the coast of Japan is being forced under the Pacific tectonic plate. They found when the crust ruptured some 12 miles (20 km) below the planet's surface, it was powerful enough to rip all the way to the surface.

That rupture pushed up a massive amount of seafloor, which in turn triggered the huge tsunami that devastated the coast.

Meanwhile, the wedge of crust where the quake struck was not only thrust outward, but extended horizontally like an accordion, Tsuji reported. That explains the fissures, which occurred as the crust got stretched.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm

"The Religious Right claims, and their secular allies in the corporate elite similarly believe, that capitalism is God's ordained economic system for this world - almost as if Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Malthus were Biblical figures on a par with Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Nehemiah, and so forth; and that the system they devised - i.e., capitalism - finds its origins in the Bible and should be adhered to with as much ardor and ebullience as one would adhere to the injunctions of Holy Writ."
http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm

Intelligent Design and God Man and ET

At the enterprisemission.com is an article titled as above,
click to read it.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/IntelligentDesignandGod-Man-and-ET.htm

This is essentially the position of Lloyd Pye's Intervention Theory,
http://www.lloydpye.com/ and to sum it up, we are the product of
experiments by intelligent life from elsewhere.

Now, granted, evidence for ID is also evidence for IT (Intervention
Theory in any of its forms).

But that ignores an important thing. Where did ET come from?
Even if you argue that the creation of mankind on the sixth day
is stated so singly from the rest of it, instead of starting it with
God saying life incl. something made in His image and likeness
should come out of the ground, but instead He does that and
then makes a special move with mankind, that this is a telescoping
of events in which He used ET to make us, even IF you argue
that, or, that whatever the original human was it is now altered
by the ET intervention, perhaps part of the curse on Eve played
out perhaps not in her life but later, that birthing would be
more difficult, so the larger head is part of that, and oops, the
(maybe marsupial) greyskins decided they wanted us to look
large headed like them somewhat, was something God allowed
as part of this curse,

even IF you argue all this, you still have no solution to the
origin of life itself, let alone nonsentient matter throughout
the universe.

So its back to God. meanwhile, the interesting stuff these
intervention theorists find should not be ignored or
condemned, but fit it into the creationist model, whether
young earth, old earth, or midrange earth.

Justina

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered

Science 5 September 1997: 
Vol. 277 no. 5331 p. 1435 
DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1435a
  • RESEARCH NEWS
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY

Haeckel's Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered

Using modern techniques, a British researcher has photographed embryos like those pictured in the famous, century-old drawings by Ernst Haeckel--proving that Haeckel's images were falsified. Haeckel once admitted to his peers that he doctored the drawings, but that confession was forgotten.

you have to subscribe to read the whole article. I read about this once before. This is where you 
get the idea that embryos go through all stages of evolution before becoming whatever they

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Continuity of Government and Deep Underground Military Bunkers

I have been doing some thinking lately. The whole thing that
could point to expecting nibiru, on the part of elites, dates to
before that is likely to have been on their radar. Of course
some of it made sense in terms of hiding black ops that involved
nazi tech with or without backengineered alien tech (and some
of the former involved probably the latter to begin with).

And of course, the Cold War which could go nuclear at any time.
Looking at Peter Dale Scott's article
http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/scott-pd14.1.html this was
something they were not averse to starting back then, and there
are other things I read as well.

While nibiru IS now on their radar, it seems to me that the rush
to start WW3 is part of what they were prepping for anyway.
Cause it, survive it, come out on top of the (mostly provoked)
enemies AND on top of the American people and on top of
stuff in the Constitution to their dislike, which would probably
(like the Onion News Network parody said) include a "Bill of
Rights to be rewritten by....classified."

Justina

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

were our small brained stocky ancestors actually genetically engineered supersoldiers of pre flood civilzation?

"In the mean time, the most powerful nations of the world 
will pour R&D money intogrowing genetically modified 
super soldierswho are secretly birthed, raised and trained 
to be as robotic as possible. These super soldiers will be 
genetically engineered with peak performance attributes 
(high blood oxygenation, large body frames, etc.) combined 
with small brains that can only process enough information 
tofollow ordersbut neverquestionthem."
http://www.naturalnews.com/034229_science_cyborgs.html

my readers may recall that I posted a draft for a book about life on Mars, 
starting on Earth as offworld capable genetically engineered warriors
and laborers of various sorts from a high tech antediluvian civilization.

when I read the above, on a link on another link in an email
subscription, that part about large body frame and small brain, in 
the context of a supersoldier, jumped off the page at me.

Justina

The Explosive That Blew Up Building 7 And The Twin Towers Revealed In New Theory

http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/1415/262/NL/?currentSplittedPage=0

aluminum from the burning planes melted and joined water farther
down in the buildings, from the sprinklers, which forms a very
dangerous explosive.

Former Black Panther Warns of Deadly Plans By Anarchists For The 2012 Republican Convention

I don't normally care much for this site, but this is worth reading
and warning about what is up.

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/former-black-panther-brandon-darby-quits-and-works-under-cover-for-the-fbi-warns-conservatives-of-2012-violence/

Friday, November 18, 2011

9-11 Pentagon, Friendly Fire?

a point is made on an otherwise dubious film, that whatever
hit the pentagon penetrated 6 of 10 concrete walls, had to
be a titanium steel nosed thing, not the fragile nose and
body of a plane.

The order was out to shoot down planes, flight 93 is
accounted for, the pentagon plane is not. one video does
show some wreckage on part of the lawn in front of the
pentagon. but not enough.

so, let's suppose the pentagon headed plane was shot
down, but one of the missiles used missed and hit the
pentagon. this would have been a double embarassment,
a US military plane shoots down a civilian plane, which
even though it was being used as a weapon had all
those civilians on it, can you imagine the uproar, and then
we stop a plane from harming the pentagon, but oops, we
blow it up ourselves.

This is by no means an impossibility, the precision
targetting is very overrated, and winds can affect a flying
object.

So where's the plane? probably went down behind some
trees and hills, and was quietly cleaned up and the bodies
burned and dumped in the sea or a common grave.

are the rothschilds closet satanists? and if so how far back does this go?

Some kind of relationship may have existed between the founder of the
house of Rothschild and the Frankist Jewish heretics, followers of
false messiah Shabbatai Zevi and rejected by Orthodox Jews. Their
symbol was allegedly a red shield, and Rothschild means Red Shield.

there is also a strong resemblance between most Rothschilds and Shabbatai
Zevi himself, and their intra familial cousin marriages, have been interpreted
as to protect a bloodline as much as to keep money in the family.

Frankism was a kind of defacto satanism such as would fly in a Jewish
context. All the values of Judaism especially sexual purity were turned
upside down, and in a way reminiscent of some of the ancient gnostic
heresies, it was thought you could be redeemed by sinning. A classic
case of what I call inversionism, which is where the values of the larger
group the inversionist, whether an individual or a cult, is supposedly a
part of, are deliberately flouted or reversed, as a fast track to occult
power.

Rabbi Felix Antelmann, author of To Eliminate The Opiate vols. 1
and 2, details this strange cult and its depradations on Judaism. Seems
it also had a sidewash into the Christian Scriptures textual criticism,
though its real target was the destruction of the Torah among Jews.
Some Frankists converted fraudulently to Catholicism. Higher Criticism
first became evident in its attacks on the Pentateuch, denying Moses
wrote any of it, and pretending to identify 4 writers or kinds of schools
of thouht at least, within it. The ideas apparently had their origin in
Frankist influence, whether any member of the team originating this
notion was a Frankist at all or not. A history major in college who
did years of research in source material, found that Rothschild's original
name was Bauer, for some reason he changed his name, and may or may
not have been the first to equate the hexagram or "star of David" with
Judaism.

One thing that has always troubled me about the supposedly
uber Orthodox Jewish Kabbalists is the office of Ba'al Shem tov.
The word for Lord in Hebrew is Adonai, and there is no prohibition
on pronouncing this, only on pronouncing the Tetragrammaton or
four letters, YHWH, The Name of God Himself.

So why BA'AL Shem tov? that is the CANAANITE word for lord,
and always in Scripture refers solely to the Canaanite false god,
whose worship was a constant infiltrating threat and an abomination
in YHWH's sight.

What is a good Jewish rabbi doing having that as a name or title?
Something is wrong here.....


http://scalaregia.blogspot.com/2010/01/air-de-la-folie.html
And the occasion for this was, what? something that might
excuse this like Halloween on time or the next day as per
some European customs? No. Just good old December.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/the-satanic-rothschild/
get a look at that jewelry. though some is disguised some is
overt.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Nobody's Gonna Like This Or Maybe A Lot Will

A while back, I came across a real good analysis of America as being
the mystery Babylon the Great, Mother of Harlots and Abominations,
in the The Book of Revelation. Or maybe it was just New York City.
Doing a google search to locate this original information, I found too
much to go through. But America per se has some unsettling corellations
to Babylon.

Later I ran across an egroup that announced up front it will not
tolerate posts that argue that America is Babylon "because then
we would have to come out of America," which struck me as
real stupid. The issue of whether or not America is, or is any
part of, Babylon the Great, is not something to decide based
on your unwillingness to emigrate.

Now, the reasons for the call to leave geographically are
twofold. (1) to not become a partaker of her sins, and (2) to not
get caught up in and suffer from the devastating wrath that is to
come upon her.

In a small (large for its time but small for now) city state like
ancient Babylon, it is hard to avoid both. In a sprawling geography
like the continenal USA, it is faily easy to avoid both. Well, the
second depends on where you live.

The most recent thing brought to my attention on this,
was from a reader who pointed me to Antipas Ministries.
http://www.antipasministries.com and reading up more on ex members
at odds on some point or another, but agreeing in major points like
this, I located Tribulation Network http://www.the-tribulation-network.com/

Now except for some things Antipas doesn't harp on, the underlying
theology and eschatology seems 90% or more correct to The Bible and
the early church, though there are some deviations predictable from its
founders' protestant background. (I used to be in this category, I am
now Eastern Orthodox but that is another story.)

As time passed as I read their stuff, I noticed a strident and subtly
elitist tone, which was hard to pin down, but detailed by a detractor
who left them. I think the military background of one of the
founders is part of the cause of this.

meanwhile The Watchman Report writer seems to be hearing
from someone pretending to be Christ and The Holy Spirit who
teaches false ideas about the antichrist not being an actual person.
write that site off your list. (I may have a link to some anti occultism
article there on my link list, I don't know, but links in general do
not mean acceptance of everything at the overall site it is at.)

Now, there seems to be some confusions rampant in a lot of
interpretation, that confuses the antichrist with Babylon the
Great, and with the beast she rides, who is explicitly designated
as the seven hills she sits on, also some prior and future kings,
one of which may be the antichrist.

Congruent to all this, is the fact that some of the most abominable
cults in those days, were those of the so called "great mother"
and some of them incl. imagery of her driving or riding lions
or something like that.

Well did H. P. Lovecraft write in one of his dark poems,
"I am the voice of mother earth, from which all horrors
have their birth." dismissed by rationalists as oedipal dread, but
probably more than just that. The devouring mother is a concept
from India to Aztec Mexico. the Biblical concept dust to dust
is totally different, it is about dissolving back into what you were
made out of by the Creator, not about being cannibalistically
reabsorbed by someone who spawned you. Dust is impersonal,
and not something at all like you.

Tribulation network has its flaws too, apparently following the
lead of supposed prophecy experts who try to tie end times events
to Jewish feast cycles, which is ridiculous. no such corellations
are obvious in Daniel or Revelation, and St. Paul tells us to not
even bother about such. If it was important, we would have been
told it is important.

Another big confusion, from the first several hundred years to now,
is the idea of the millennial rule of Christ. early chiliastic movements
focussed on this. the early Church correctly dismissed this as a
heresy.

The problem is, that chiliasm sees Christ as only reigning for a thousand
years. The Bible says the Kingdom of Heaven lasts forever. The Creed
drawing on biblical tradition says "of His Kingdom there shall be no
end."

Revelation DOES NOT LIMIT Christ's reign to a thousand years.

What it DOES say, is that when Christ comes back, He will bind satan
for a thousand years, so that he cannot tempt the nations at all during
that time.

This puts to nought the idea that this time of binding and Christ's ruling
is going on now in the Church, because even though you argue that you
are under Christ's protection if you keep focussed on Him, the fact is
that Revelation said that satan would not be able to tempt THE NATIONS,
not the Church, and further St. Peter and St. Paul make clear that indeed
he DOES tempt and ensnare Christians. The need for exorcism and for
spiritual warfare, whether in the sense of against demons directly, or
against all kinds of sin inclination that can incl. demonic indirect influence,
puts the lie to all of this amillennial and satan is bound now sort of thinking,
which is turning up in some evangelical or charismatic scenes, and took over
the RC and I am sad to say the EO line of interpretation centuries ago.

After that thousand years, satan would be loosed to tempt mankind one
more time, and those who follow him will do a revolt against Christ, but
 the revolt will be put down. At some point after that, the general resurrection,
the Last Judgement, and the New Heavens and the New Earth and the New
Jerusalem will come down from heaven, and it being some 1500 miles high
wide and long, a huge cube, and given layers within it several hundred
or more billion square miles of living space, that new heavens and new
earth must involve a total overhaul of the laws of physics.

Meanwhile, Christ will have been reigning all along, during the thousand
years that satan is bound, and all along after.

Back to the America as Babylon interpretation.

Wikipedia lists all the cities that are claimed to be built on seven hills.
there are a lot of them. some are port cities, some are not. America has
at least twelve of them. and in the New York City area is a village called
Babylon. 


That doesn't mean that the attack on the WTC was righteous. Indeed,
it was likely in part an inside facilitated job using Saudis, to promote the
babylonish agenda of the satanic ruling class elites.

But Babylon is not the Roman church. The Vatican right now is a city
state, a separate nation within the confines of the nation of Italy, but not
under the Italian government, a sovereign small nation. The RC never
ruled Rome as its secular ruler, wherever the Vatican was held to be
located, whether within Roman city limits or not. The present Roman city
limits are not the same as the old city limits of John's time.

Antipas Ministries joins the ranks of the ignorant and half baked
when it denounces USA having diplomatic relations with Vatican
City as against the Constitution, because Vatican City is not the
Roman Catholic Church, it is a sovereign nation state that happens
to be a theocracy, in this case run by the RC, just like Saudi Arabia
or any other sovereign nation state that happens to be a theocracy
run by some other religious entity. Also, the Constitution only
forbids the federal government from making an established
religion, which says nothing about having some official relationship
with one. An establishment of religion is about making a particular
denomination, not a general category of religion like Christianity
as distinct from Judaism as distinct from Islam as distinct from
paganism of one sort or another as distinct from Buddhism, and
a hierarchy and organization be the official religion which every
citizen has to pay a tithe or something like that to, or at least
taxes support the established religion (same idea as an
establishment of business, a particular church organization like
a particular business) as distinct from some function of it like
religious run schools, which taxes used to support in the USA
until protestants argued these shouldn't when RC schools
started getting tax support.

Diplomatic relations with a  sovereign nation state which is
a theocracy is another matter entirely.

Neither is it the kind of port city whose destruction can be seen from
afar, nor is it a major importer of goods and slaves and whatnot. America
is. the great whore is described as drunk on the blood of the saints, and
there is an issue of a kind of mystery and of intoxication, and of the kings
of the earth being "drunk with the wine of her fornication." whoredom
is not always strictly about sex. Lust for power and money is a drug in
itself, and the best detailing and denunciation of all these things I have
seen yet is at the Antipas Ministries site.

Prophecy, someone pointed out, has an odd way of double fulfillment.
such as Abraham, while aged from an aged woman, he begets a son.
And his son though not as old does similar. Prophecy can have a dry
run or partial fulfillment and a replay or main fulfillment later.

contrary to Antipas Ministries take on Babylon, the core of the city
WAS destroyed and disappeared under the sands, only to be dug up
by archaeologists in the 1800s, a haunted and cursed place that
bedouins would not camp overnight at. the location called Babylon
to a late date and eventually renamed, was more like a suburb, just
as a city in Alexander's time and now had a double existence a
rebuilt or extended one existing next to the main one.

The details of Daniel's prophecy about the wars between the kings
of the north and the south were fulfilled in detail in the days of
Antiochus Epiphanus, and maybe some others, yet despite having 
to know all this, being only a few hundred years later, and privy to
the Books of Maccabees and pagan historians, the early church
Fathers incl. Hippolytus looked for a fulfillment of these things
in future. 


Something very much to recommend Antipas and Tribulation Network,
to those who are concerned about the Apostolic Fathers and somewhat
later Patristic Fathers, is that these two sites' writers are very well
acquainted with them, or at least some of them.

Meanwhile, I am not happy with the Antipas writers' reaction to the
Christian Right being mad at homosexuals. Sure, they are an easy target.
But while they are not top ten on the list of works of the flesh he quotes
from Paul, fornication and lasciviousness are, and fornication is a term
that covers more than just heterosexual prostitution or free of charge
no strings heterosexual adult sex.

elsewhere, Paul definitely puts them as the final degradation end
result of idolatry and refusing to honor YHWH as the true God and
Creator, in Romans, and elsewhere warns against two very sneaky and
dangerous groups of people: the concision, those who wanted to
restore circumcision and mosaic ritual and food laws and "dogs,"
common slang for buggery or anal sex aka doggy style, whether
heterosexual or homosexual. (actually vaginal entry can be done from
the rear also, but that was not the point.) So yes, homosexuals or
rather those who accept their inclinations as right and act on them
or are willing to act on them, are a major issue for Christians.

elsewhere, he does focus on the convergence of perverse sexuality,
whether bondage and pain inducing or pedophilia, and occultism
and the influence of evil spirits released by occultism experiments
in secret government labs and the CIA.

Justina

Here's How It All Started Folks! The Christian Right Political Movement a Spawn of Moonie Hell!

A lot of people don't know this, and others have forgotten. But the whole Christian Right movement we know today, as distinct from earlier manifestations which had their own immoral or otherwise unbiblical "networking" problems, began when some fool preacher with a big following decided that we should all back up the unreverend moon in his fight with the IRS.

Seems the blasphemous and heretical sonofabitch and false messiah, who claims to be the Second Coming or Christ's replacement, or something like that, claimed that he owed no taxes, because you can't tax a church, and he being godintheflesh WAS the church so owed no personal income taxes, period.

The resulting government action was styled "religious persecution" and some people feeling oh so
holy and realpolitik and above others for the insight it takes (or rather lack of same) to partner with
such a person, said that if Moon is the target now, we will be the target next. Ignoring that the issue
was that his claim was such that we as Christian should hold him as anathema and an abomination.

Meanwhile about the same time, some hairbrained Baptist minister in I think it was Washington
state, was running a church school for children, that was not Sunday school but regular schooling,
and refused to use accredited teachers or accredited text books.

Now, there is no difficulty I am sure in finding Christians even of his denomination, who are
accredited teachers.  And if the accredited texts include stuff repugnant, that is easy to turn
into an occasion to train against such content, by presenting the content and in the secular 
education relevant class, such secular postions as are against it and time the Sunday school
to the biblical reasons against it or some such arrangement. 

But in his pride and arrogance he refused to follow the reasonable government guidelines,
rebelling against St. Paul's admonitions to obey government when it doesn't directly and
explicitly attack Christianity. so the State of Washington or maybe it was his county, 
locked the building. I think he cut the bolt, and here comes the judge.

So these two incidents, blown up to being "religious persecution" were sold to the
political movement as an end in itself seeking evangelical leaders, as something to back,
when they should have mocked it. 

I remember one person on TV (I don't remember if it was Constance Cumbey or 
someone else) commented that God has two arms, the church and the state, and in 
the Moon case God had used the state to attack something bad, and we Christians
should cheer instead of supporting this. (Now that I think about it, it might have
been that Baptist minister in Washington state that was being discussed, and that
he also had been networking with the moonies. There was moonie money in the
Bush scene also.) I thought it was a good point. It wasn't a 
full shutdown of course, but it was undermining of him and perhaps of his status 
in the eyes of some who might be deceived, but were open to being affected by 
official views outside of churches real or false. 

I also remember, that when I started to commit myself to what I saw as a useful
thing, the right wing agenda and see if I could manage a conservative version of
a feminist movement, something seemed to tell me I was prostituting myself,
like the concept of a media whore or something. I thought, and then shrugged it
off. But that voice like thought, probably from an angel who at one point then
or later had a hand in my losing a carborundum pendant I was using as a 
pendulum device when I was still messing with some of the occult thinking some
of it was salvageable from the realm of darkness, was correct, and as time wore
on, though I didn't go into full darkness, I did find in retrospect that political
focus eclipsed religious focus, while pretending to be a manifestation of it. I
didn't buy the Moon and whatsisname support as a good thing, but the overall
movement of Christian conservative political action and gung ho as an end in 
itself, looking for an outlet, was the big thing. As Screwtape said, it doesn't 
matter what is on the other side of "and" in "Christianity and...." so long as it
grows to replace the Christianity part. My doubts were always overshadowed
by the communist menace, but the fall of the Iron Curtain freed me to whole
hog reject the problematic right.

Of course, the anti gay and anti abortion positions are important, but let's
face it, the president doesn't rule by decree so it doesn't matter a rat's ass
what his position is on anything like that, what is more important is the
corrupt and fascistic and immoral and secretly perverted and even satanic
networks that the Republican Party has come to more and more consist of
and even then there were signs of it. Some of which are invisible to anyone
who thinks gung ho fleshliness is okay as long as it has a Christian label
and doesn't examine the underlying drives.

I was in theory against welfare and for the free market and minimal govt.,
but in practice until something better could be set up, that WORKED, 
I never denounced anyone for being on it, and helped some who were
and who couldn't make it on the amount they had, especially one with kids
and a drug user "old man." Free or minimal fee services are essential.

Knocking around in my mind however were a few points I'd picked up,
incl. a radio speaker who pointed out that nowhere in The Bible does
God mandate any one form of government, all He cares about is what 
will get His will done in that situation at that time, and that we should
pay our taxes.

Finally a good read of the Constitution again, and a lot of other things,
made me realize the whole conservative movement especially the militia
and related forms of interpretation and the economic theories that drove
it, were a pack of lies.

begins here the article that rang a bell. 

Justina






ALLIANCE BETWEEN
EVANGELICALS
AND THE MOONIES

Written By
S. R. Shearer


The Unification Church of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon embodies within its doctrine a particularly vile heresy: that not only did Jesus fail in His earthly ministry, but that He had sex with the women who followed Him. The attack here is not one that is aimed only at His work on the Cross, but at Him personally as a moral Being.
That any Christian in good conscience could have even the most indirect contact with such people defies all logic and rationale; and more, that Christians should involve themselves in a political alliance with them to "take back the nation for Christ" is "oxymoronic." There is simply no sense to it.
Yet this is precisely what is happening! - and perhaps more than anything else, it reveals the deadly spiritual and theological pathology involved in the lives of those who are embracing "Christian political action." In 1986 reporters questioned Christian Voice's Colonel Doner about his involvement with the Unification Church. He responded, "CAUSA (Moon's political arm) is an anticommunist organization. It's a funding source. CAUSA is anticommunist and personally I'm for anybody that's anticommunist. The Mormons are the same. I'm not going to lend credence to their organization, but networking, I'm happy to network with them." Does that mean that its OK for Christians to ally themselves with the Nazis, the KKK, the Death Squads, etc.? - they're all anticommunists. The answer is apparently, "Yes!"
Ron Godwin, the former second in command to Jerry Falwell in the Moral Majority now is the business manager for Moon's weekly magazine, Insight. The head of the National Religious Broadcasters, Ben Armstrong, along with TBN's Paul Crouch and Bible teacher Hal Lindsey are on the board of Moon's dominated Coalition for Religious Freedom. James Robison, Rex Humbard, and James Kennedy are also members, as is Tim LaHaye. This is to say nothing of Robert Grant, Gary Jarmin and Colonel Doner.
LaHaye's involvement with the Rev. Moon is particularly vile. In 1985 Carolyn Weaver, writing in Mother Jones Magazine, exposed the fact that LaHaye had received substantial funds from Moon's Bo Hi Pak.
She based her report on a cassette tape inadvertently provided to her by an aide to Beverly LaHaye; it was a dictation of a letter from LaHaye to his secretary to be typed and sent to Bo Hi Pak thanking him for a substantial contribution of funds (estimated by some to have been over $500,000.00). A friend of ours - well known in Christian circles - upon reading the article, phoned LaHaye to ascertain the facts. But rather than dealing with the issue - whether or not he took the money - he attacked the source, Mother Jones Magazine, as a "left-wing ragsheet."
Our friend answered, "I don't care if the source was Pravda or Izvestia (two well known Communist papers), is it true?" He angrily hung up the phone. He has since apparently denied the story, most likely compounding his error with a lie. And the fact that he continues to involve himself with Moonie front organizations tends to give credence to Carolyn Weaver - after all, there seems to be very little doubt that the voice on the tape is LaHaye's.
Written By S. R. Shearer
Antipas Ministries

A hilarious look at the end of the world from a top prepper

http://www.youtube.com/user/dsarti1#p/search/0/eziGnnwJMl4

prepper for those who don't know the lingo, is someone into
preparedness, as distinct from a survivalist.