Monday, May 8, 2017

the Islamic Antichrist Debunked

spat with Walid Shoebat

Walid and Ted Shoebat are of the Islamic antichrist theory persuasion, one of those
things of which I say "they're onto something but it isn't what they think it is."
Walid is accused of false personal history, though a news article turned up that
validates his story.

Ihave detailed on his site the contemporaneous beast theory of Daniel and I'm sure
he doesn't like it.

But lately I called him and Ted on mishandling Scripture. repeatedly they will
make some extensive article on some point, AND THEIR OVERALL ASSESSMENT
IS MOSTLY CORRECT, but mixed in with rightly quoted Scripture is wrongly
quoted Scripture. the latest thing is Luke 1:15 which they say is about Jesus Christ,
when it is about John the Baptist! I called them on this and Walid banned me with
this nasty AND TOTALLY FALSE accusation, which I answer here since banned

"Previously she stated she was charismatic pentecostal."
I have never said I was charismatic pentecostal I said here or elsewhere that I after many years came to the conclusion this was a deception not valid.
"She even mocked the birth of Christ in another comment regarding the story of Onan's "wasted seed" mocking how this could be the line where Christ came from."
are you drunk or maliciously lying? I never said or even thought anything remotely like this.
I did say that the term "young woman" alma implies per Strong's Concordance a veiling and isolating that would mean there was no contact, no petting no nothing, a betulah virgin could give birth without a miracle as non penetrative sex acts that can result in an oops exist, SO IT IS MORE OF A GUARANTEE OF A MIRACLE TO USE THE WORD ALMAH THAN BETULAH both can be translated "virgin" but the Hebrew word rules out any kind of oops and rules out artificial insemination also.
"This is no Orthodox, not even a charismatic Pentecostal Evangelical. This is someone who is in disguise and is dishonest and believes not in Christ."
you are slanderous and idiotic.
you are also wrong in several Scripture quotes. Luke chapter 1 is about JOHN THE BAPTIST GO READ IT FOR YOURSELF.
YOU DO CHRIST NO FAVOR BY ARGUING FOR VALID DOCTRINES USING INVALID SCRIPTURE QUOTES likewise Malachi doesn't say grain offering though the incense angle shows your interpretation is valid, but your quote is not.
" Its an impostor and for years I put up with them reveals my patience. So finally it is wolf be gone. There is no room for dishonest people who cover up who they really are."
I am more honest than you are per these slanders.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Especially For Muslims

Orthodoxy in Indonesia
An Interview with Archimandrite Daniel Bambang Dwi Byantoro
by Thomas Hulbert, Road to Emmaeus Vol 2, No 3

Thomas: How do you approach the souls that come to you? If they are Moslem how do you work with them and how do you explain the difference between Christianity and Islam. How do you draw them in?

Fr. Daniel: I think that in any missionary work, you must first of all understand the culture of the people and you have to be able to speak within the bounds of that cultural language, because otherwise your word cannot be heard or understood. So, when you talk with a Moslem, you must understand the Moslem mind. Don’t just try to throw in words and phrases that are familiar to Christians, to Orthodox, because they will not be understood by a Moslem. First of all, when you talk to a Moslem, you have to emphasize that God is One.

Thomas: Because they already believe this?

Fr. Daniel: Not only because they already believe this, but because they accuse us [the Christians] of having three gods. That is the problem. So, you have to clear up the misunderstanding that we worship three gods. Don’t try to use our traditional language, like Father, Son and Holy Spirit – because for them, that is three gods! In their minds, the Father is different, the Son is different, the Holy Spirit is different. For myself, I emphasize that God is One, that this One God is also the Living God, and as the Living God He has Mind. Because if God didn’t have a mind, I’m sorry to say, He would be like an idiot. God has to have a mind. Within the Mind of God there is the Word. Thus, the Word of God is contained within God Himself. So, God in His Word is not two, but one. God is full with His own Word; He is pregnant with Word. And that Word of God is then revealed to man. The thing that is contained within – like being impregnated within oneself – when it is revealed, it is called being born out of that person. That is why the Word of God is called the Son: He is the Child Who is born from within God, but outside time. So, that is why this One God is called the Father, because He has His own Word Who is born out of Him, and is called the Son. So, Father and Son are not two gods. The Father is One God, the Son is that Word of God. The Moslem believes that God created the world through the Word. So what the Moslem believes in as Word, is what the Christians call the Son! In that way, we can explain to them that God does not have a son separate from Himself.

Thomas: So the Moslems see our idea of the Son of God in terms of physical sonship.

Fr. Daniel: Yes, of course. And God does not have a son in that way, that’s true. He is not begetting in the sense of a human being giving birth. He is called the Father because He produces from Himself, His own Word, and that Word is the Son.

So because God is the living God, He must have the principle of life within Himself. In man, this principle of life is man’s spirit. God is the same. The principle of life within God is the Spirit of God. It is called the Holy Spirit. But the Holy Spirit is not the name of the Angel Gabriel, as the Moslems understand it. The Holy Spirit is the living principle, the principle of life and power within God Himself. This One God is called the Father because He produced from Himself His own Word, which is called the Son, and the Word of God is called the Son because He is born out of the Father eternally, without beginning, without end. This One Living God also has Spirit within Himself. So, Father, Son and Holy Spirit is one God. This is the way we explain to Moslems about the Trinity, and we should not try to use our language of “Father and Son, co-equal, co-...” something like that. Even though it is our Christian terminology, they will not understand this. The purpose is not to theologize to them but to explain the reality of the Gospel in a way that is understandable to them. This is point number one: you have to be clear about the Trinity.

The second point is this: the basic difference between Islam and Christianity concerns revelation. In Islam, God does not reveal Himself. God only sends down His word. “Revelation” in Islam means “the sending down of the word of God” through the prophets. And that word is then written down and becomes scripture. So in Islam, revelation means the “inscripturization” of the word of God while in Christianity, it is not the same. The Word was sent down to the womb of the Virgin Mary, took flesh and became man. Namely, Jesus Christ. So, the two religions believe that God communicated Himself to man by means of the Word, but the difference is how that Word manifested in the world. In Christianity it is manifested in the person of Jesus Christ and in Islam it is manifested in the form of a book, the Koran. So, the place of Mohammed in Islam is parallel to the place of the Virgin Mary in Orthodox Christianity. That is why in Islam the Moslems respect Mohammed, not as a god, but as the bearer of revelations. Just as the Orthodox Church respects the Virgin Mary not as a goddess but as the bearer of the Word of God, who gave birth to the Word of God. Incidentally, the two religions both give salutations, to Mohammed for the Moslems and to the Virgin Mary for Christians. The Moslems also have a kind of akathist, like a paraclesis but to Mohammed! It is called the depa abarjanji – in Orthodox terms it would be a “canon” to Mohammed, because he is the bearer of the revelation.

Thomas: So Mohammed is venerated like a saint?

Fr. Daniel: He is venerated, yes. Very much so. But there are also the Sufi Moslems, who sometimes believe that Mohammed was “already there,” like the Arian misunderstanding of Christ. In their view, Mohammed was the “first created soul,” for whom the world was created. This is called the Nor-Mohammed. So, the purpose of Islamic mystics is to be like Mohammed, to imitate him.

Thomas: To be the bearer of the Word?

Fr. Daniel: As Mohammed was.

Thomas: So, that is why Sufi mystics are perhaps not so legalistic?

Fr. Daniel: Yes, they are more mystical.

So, for us, the image of the Church is the Virgin Mary. We are called to be like the Virgin Mary in our submission to God. The Virgin Mary is the picture, the image, or I should say, the icon of the Church. Mohammed is the “icon” of the ideal Moslem man, and because of that the way we worship diverges. In Christianity, because the Word became a man, became flesh, for us to be united with that Word we have to be united with the content of that revelation. What is the content? The incarnation, crucifixion, death and resurrection of that Person. In order for us to be united with the content of that revelation, we have to be united in that Person, namely in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. How? Through baptism. And we also have to be united with the life of the resurrection of that incarnate Word. How? By the Holy Spirit, through Chrismation. So, the sacraments are very important for us because God became man. He sanctified the physical world so that the physical elements of nature can be used as the means by which we are united
with the person of Christ in the sacraments.

In Islam, however, because the word becomes a book, the content of the book is writing. It is not flesh. So, that is why in order for a Moslem to unite with the content of the two-fold revelation (that God is one and that Mohammed is His prophet) one has to recite the source of revelation – because it is a book. But you cannot be united with or immersed in a book, you can only memorize the content of the book in the original form, namely in Arabic. So, Arabic scripture is the form of that revelation. The God-Man Jesus is the form of that revelation in Christianity. In order for a person to be initiated into Islamic revelation, you must confess the creed: “I confess that there is no God except Allah, and that Mohammed is the Apostle of Allah.” When you confess that, you become Moslem. There is no baptism, you are not united in the death of anyone, you are only united to the form of the revelation. To stay united to the revelation, you must keep the prayers. In prayer you recite the Koran, so five times a day you pray, five times a day you immerse yourself in the ocean of divine revelation, which is the Koran. Prayer itself is the sacrament of Islam. In order for us Christians to be immersed in the form of the revelation, which is Jesus Christ, we have to partake of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ continually. In that way we are united to Jesus Christ, while in Islam the recitation of the Koran is the most important thing, because it is a form of sacrament to the Moslems.

So those are the basic differences. This is a way to understand the Moslem mind instead of just arguing against them.

Thomas: Would you say that most Muslims are conscious of this theological aspect of God and man’s relationship to Him?

Fr. Daniel: Yes, of course, through the Koran, through the prophets. 

Thomas: In Islam, is a person’s manner of life of secondary importance to the correct understanding of the form of revelation?

Fr. Daniel: In the manner of life, Islam refers again to the form of revelation, which is a book. The content of the book is writing, the writing is law, so the law has to be obeyed. If we have the imitation of Christ and His teachings, they have the imitation of Mohammed and the Koran. That is why the life of a Moslem is dictated and governed by the law of the Koran, while our life is dictated by the law of Christ in the Holy Spirit.

Thomas: What is the difference then between following these two laws?

Fr. Daniel: In Islam, there is no new birth, just a return to God, which means repentance. This is called submission to God.

Thomas: And that is the meaning of the word Islam, “to submit?”

Fr. Daniel: Yes. Islam means submission to God. That is the way we have to understand the difference between the way of life of Islam and of Orthodox Christianity. There are some parallel ways of thinking, but very different con- tent. The main difference is that in Orthodox Christianity the Word became flesh and in Islam the word became a book. That is the main difference.

Thomas: How do Moslem converts to Orthodoxy sustain their belief in the predominantly Moslem society of Indonesia? Do you have communities of Orthodox Christians who live together and support each other in the hostile religious environment, or is the parish way of life more common?

Fr. Daniel: No, we don’t really have any special kind of community where we live together. We are spread out geographically like other Christians, and we come to the church for services. But as to how we withstand the environment – the way I do it is that I teach very strong Bible classes in Indonesian. Every day I have Bible study before Holy Communion. In between Orthros [Matins] and Liturgy there is always Bible study. And in my Bible study, there is always a comparison between Christianity and Islam, all the time. It reminds people that this is Christianity and this over here is Islam. For example, I ask questions like: “OK, in nature which is higher, a human being or a book?” Being formed by Moslem culture, some of them say “a book.” So then I’ll ask them, “Which is higher, then, revelation of God in the form of a human being or in the form of a book?” Of course, revelation is higher in the form of a human being. They can see that from God Himself. So, God the Word become flesh, the Word become man, is higher than the word which became a book. That’s number one. Second, if in the past God sent down His word through the prophets in the form of a book, namely the Old Testament, and the Old Testament has been fulfilled completely in the form of man, Jesus Christ, is it possible, after the Word of God has been fulfilled in man, that God would revert to the old way, sending a book again? Of course not! When the Word has become man, it is already complete. And that Man, Jesus Christ, is still alive! So, it is impossible that God would again send another revelation in the form of a book. From our point of understanding, it is not possible. For us, the most perfect prophet and the last revelation of God is Jesus Christ. There is no need for any other revelation. This is the point I emphasize again and again. They understand this quite well. So this is how we keep holding onto the path of Christ in spite of so many attacks from the Moslems.

Thomas: The Moslems pressure the Christians, then, knowing that they can tempt them with these deeply-rooted cultural ideas? 

Fr. Daniel: Yes.

Thomas: Maybe you could tell us more about this. What are the difficulties that Christians encounter in a Moslem environment? 

Fr. Daniel: You know, when you are living among a Moslem majority, sometimes you are afraid of being asked about your faith. Christian people who have been formed in a Moslem environment cannot always explain themselves; and Moslems, fearing that Christian “heresies” will spread are always ready to attack – about the “three gods,” about “worshiping a human being,” about the cross, about all the fundamental beliefs of Christianity. Christians are often not ready to answer these things. Also, almost every morning all of the Indonesian TV channels broadcast about Islam. There is no other religion being aired. Everyone is bombarded with Islam, the mosques are plastered with loud speakers and people are always talking against Christianity. The police do not do anything. In this way, we have been psychologically defeated. Many books are written attacking Christianity and there is no way to answer them because when a Christian tries to answer about his faith he has to criticize Islam and this is very difficult. There will be a reactionary demonstration against him. In the city of Solo, there is a man by the name of Achmed Wilson who became a Christian. He is now on trial in court because he was asked on a call-in radio program what he thought about Mohammed, and he answered that he believed as a Christian. So, this is a great problem for him now. Things like this are very common.

Thomas: So there is no real religious freedom?

Fr. Daniel: No. Don’t even think about it. It is very difficult when you live in such a society. You are allowed to criticize the idea of God because god is a general term. The Buddhists believe in a god, the Hindus believe in a god, the Christians believe in a god, but don’t criticize Mohammed because that is distinctly Islamic. You can criticize the idea of God, you can become an atheist, but don’t say anything about Mohammed or you’ll be in trouble.

Thomas: How do former Moslems who convert to Orthodoxy cope with family situations? Are they able to continue to live with their non-Christian family members? Are they accepted?

Fr. Daniel: Some of them are accepted and some are not. There are cases when they return to their former beliefs, to their families, and confess Islam again, although when they meet me they still say that they believe in Christ. They do believe and they worship secretly in their homes, but they cannot come to church. Several of our people are like that. Some of the families are better. They are more open and they let their children continue in their Christian faith without being disturbed. It differs with each person, from area to area, and even from one ethnic group to another. Some ethnic groups are more fanatical than others.

Thomas: How do you encourage Orthodox Christians to conduct themselves in public given this dangerous environment? We here in Europe often read about persecution and martyrdom in Indonesia.

Fr. Daniel: I always teach them that if there is no possible way to escape (even if we have been trying to be good and obey the laws of society), if we become known as a believer, if they stigmatize us as unbelievers as heretics or whatever, then it is obvious there is no other way – if martyrdom comes, then we have to accept it. If you cannot escape being a martyr, do it! Go for it! I teach this in church, and I say, even to myself, that there is no other way. But still, we do not try to provoke other people. Even if we evangelize, we evangelize nicely, explaining our faith like: “this is your faith and this is our faith.” We do not degrade other people’s beliefs.

Thomas: How would you encourage Christians to look at Moslems? There are two tendencies in the West: either to unconcernedly accept Islamic people and ideas regardless of their growing numbers and cultural and religious influence; or to see them as bogey men responsible for many of the world’s current political problems. Of course, we know that as individuals there are many wonderful individual Moslem people who are charitable and generous to their neighbors regardless of creed, but for many of us the overall influence of modern Islam, particularly on Christian populations, is a question. We do not want to be naive on one hand, nor uncharitable on the other. Do you have any thoughts on this?

Fr. Daniel: It is a difficult problem indeed, even for us, because there is always a dialectical relationship between us and them. In Indonesia, because they are the majority, we have to befriend them, there is no other choice. Individually, we must treat them as anyone should be treated – with love. But theologically we have to stand on what we believe to be true, there can be no compromise...

Great and Holy Tuesday!msg/alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox/kQgdK1hYCCY/wJs3SPp9BgAJ

Great and Holy Tuesday
Commemorated on April 11

Holy Week: A Liturgical Explanation for the Days of Holy Week


These three days, which the Church calls Great and Holy have within the liturgical development of the Holy Week a very definite purpose. They place all its celebrations in the perspective of End ; they remind us of the eschatological meaning of Pascha. So often Holy Week is considered one of the “beautiful traditions” or “customs,” a self-evident “part” of our calendar. We take it for granted and enjoy it as a cherished annual event which we have “observed” since childhood, we admire the beauty of its services, the pageantry of its rites and, last but not least, we like the fuss about the paschal table. And then, when all this is done we resume our normal life. But do we understand that when the world rejected its Savior, when “Jesus began to be sorrowful and very heavy... and his soul was exceedingly sorrowful even unto death,” when He died on the Cross, “normal life” came to its end and is no longer possible. For there were “normal” men who shouted “Crucify Him” who spat at Him and nailed Him to the Cross. And they hated and killed Him precisely because He was troubling their normal life. It was indeed a perfectly “normal” world which preferred darkness and death to light and life.... By the death of Jesus the “normal” world, and “normal” life were irrevocably condemned. Or rather they revealed their true and abnormal inability to receive the Light, the terrible power of evil in them. “Now is the Judgment of this world” (John 12:31). The Pascha of Jesus signified its end to “this world” and it has been at its end since then. This end can last for hundreds of centuries this does not alter the nature of time in which we live as the “last time.” “The fashion of this world passeth away...” (I Cor. 7:31).

Pascha means passover, passage. The feast of Passover was for the Jews the annual commemoration of their whole history as salvation, and of salvation as passage from the slavery of Egypt into freedom, from exile into the promised land. It was also the anticipation of the ultimate passage—into the Kingdom of God. And Christ was the fulfillment of Pascha. He performed the ultimate passage: from death into life, from this “old world” into the new world into the new time of the Kingdom. And he opened the possibility of this passage to us. Living in “this world” we can already be “not of this world,” i.e. be free from slavery to death and sin, partakers of the “world to come.” But for this we must also perform our own passage, we must condemn the old Adam in us, we must put on Christ in the baptismal death and have our true life hidden in God with Christ, in the “world to come....”

And thus Easter is not an annual commemoration, solemn and beautiful, of a past event. It is this Event itself shown, given to us, as always efficient, always revealing our world, our time, our life as being at their end, and announcing the Beginning of the new life.... And the function of the three first days of Holy Week is precisely to challenge us with this ultimate meaning of Pascha and to prepare us to the understanding and acceptance of it.

1. This eschatological (which means ultimate, decisive, final) challenge is revealed, first, in the common troparion of these days:

Troparion—Tone 8

Behold the Bridegroom comes at midnight,
And blessed is the servant whom He shall find watching,
And again unworthy is the servant whom He shall find heedless.
Beware, therefore, O my soul, do not be weighed down with sleep,
Lest you be given up to death and lest you be shut out of the Kingdom.
But rouse yourself crying: Holy, Holy, Holy, are You, O our God!
Through the Theotokos have mercy on us!

Midnight is the moment when the old day comes to its end and a new day begins. It is thus the symbol of the time in which we live as Christians. For, on the one hand, the Church is still in this world, sharing in its weaknesses and tragedies. Yet, on the other hand, her true being is not of this world, for she is the Bride of Christ and her mission is to announce and to reveal the coming of the Kingdom and of the new day. Her life is a perpetual watching and expectation, a vigil pointed at the dawn of this new day. But we know how strong is still our attachment to the “old day,” to the world with its passions and sins. We know how deeply we still belong to “this world.” We have seen the light, we know Christ, we have heard about the peace and joy of the new life in Him, and yet the world holds us in its slavery. This weakness, this constant betrayal of Christ, this incapacity to give the totality of our love to the only true object of love are wonderfully expressed in the exapostilarion of these three days:

“Thy Bridal Chamber I see adorned, O my Savior
And I have no wedding garment that I may enter,
O Giver of life, enlighten the vesture of my soul
And save me.”

2. The same theme develops further in the Gospel readings of these days. First of all, the entire text of the four Gospels (up to John 13: 31) is read at the Hours. This recapitulation shows that the Cross is the climax of the whole life and ministry of Jesus, the Key to their proper understanding. Everything in the Gospel leads to this ultimate hour of Jesus and everything is to be understood in its light. Then, each service has its special Gospel lesson

On Tuesday:

At Matins: Matthew 22: 15-23, 39. Condemnation of Pharisees, i.e. of the blind and hypocritical religion, of those who think they are the leaders of man and the light of the world, but who in fact “shut up the Kingdom of heaven to men.”

At the Presanctified Liturgy: Matthew 24: 36-26, 2. The End again and the parables of the End: the ten wise virgins who had enough oil in their lamps and the ten foolish ones who were not admitted to the bridal banquet; the parable of ten talents “. . . Therefore be ye also ready, for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of Man cometh.” And, finally the Last Judgment.

3.These Gospel lessons are explained and elaborated in the hymnology of these days: the stichiras and the triodia (short canons of three odes each sung at Matins). One warning, one exhortation runs through all of them: the end and the judgment are approaching, let us prepare for them:

“Behold, O my soul, the Master has conferred on thee a talent
Receive the gift with fear;
Lend to him who gave; distribute to the poor
And acquire for thyself thy Lord as thy Friend;
That when He shall come in glory,
Thou mayest stand on His right hand
And hear His blessed voice:
Enter, my servant, into the joy of thy Lord.”
(Tuesday Matins)

4. Throughout the whole Lent the two books of the Old Testament read at Vespers were Genesis and Proverbs. With the beginning of Holy Week they are replaced by Exodus and Job. Exodus is the story of Israel’s liberation from Egyptian slavery, of their Passover. It prepares us for the understanding of Christ’s exodus to His Father, of His fulfillment of the whole history of salvation. Job, the Sufferer, is the Old Testament icon of Christ. This reading announces the great mystery of Christ’s sufferings, obedience and sacrifice.

5. The liturgical structure of these three days is still of the Lenten type. It includes, therefore, the prayer of Saint Ephrem the Syrian with prostrations, the augmented reading of the Psalter, the Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts and the Lenten liturgical chant. We are still in the time of repentance for repentance alone makes us partakers of the Pascha of Our Lord, opens to us the doors of the Paschal banquet. And then, on Great and Holy Wednesday, as the last Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts is about to be completed, after the Holy Gifts have been removed from the altar, the priest reads for the last time the Prayer of Saint Ephrem. At this moment, the preparation comes to an end. The Lord summons us now to His Last Supper.


Saturday, April 1, 2017

a researcher on cumbey's blog said "though the Humanist movement
was huge and went back to the 1930s, every library I checked only had
reference to Humanism in the Renaissance in the card catalog. Librarians
didn't know what I was talking about. I could only go the Humanist
magazines, get their Manifestos that included signers I was aware of
the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies because of the connection
with Great Books. I also went to the Encyclopedia of Associations. Yet
somehow librarians knew nothing about Humanism" sounds like the New
Age could also be defined not only as spiritual and occultic plus politics,
but as a mix of the foregoing and secular humanism, which is usually
atheistic and rationalistic and not interested in spirituality or occultism.
politics, however, yes. Note the Great Books reference.

I was handed this mini library the Great Books when I was a teen. I read
Freud looked for phallic symbols like telephone polls and decided he was
full of crap. (Even Freud had to admit that "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."
of course that's before Bill Clinton used an unlit cigar as a dildo on Monica
Lewinsky who wanted sex I guess, but he was avoiding that to avoid adultery.
hmmmm. well it might not have been full on adultery he did, but it qualified
as cheating.)

I noticed Karl Marx in the bunch. Why is this there? I wondered. he was
supposed to be bad, so why is he in "great books," aren't "great books"
supposed to be good? (I later found out by "great" they didn't mean valuable
so much as of great influence not greatness in the sense of goodness.)

I read Aquinas, too complicated I quit. I read Augustine Confessions and
City of God that was an easier read, a hilarious critique of paganism and their
"select gods" and in general made some good points. The City of God if I recall
right argues that the two cities, of God and of man or of the devil the world the
flesh whatever is wrong in action and/or orientation though it may have some
appearance of good at times and "cities" in a metaphorical sense, coexist until
the Second Coming when the City of God will take over and roust the other one.

I thought Augustine was a jerk for kicking out his woman (worse I later found
she was mother of his son) instead of making it legal, worse his mother Monica
who was praying for his conversion wanted his concubine gone so he could
marry some classy woman she had line up as a socially useful marriage. This kind
of thing probably didn't go over well with God Who took a while to answer her
prayers for Augustine's conversion and when He did so, Augustine went for
monasticism and not marriage. So much for Monica's ambitions. Augustine's son
however was raised by Monica so she didn't leave her grandson motherless she had
some decency. The concubine left saying that no one could ever take Augustine's
place in her heart. What a mess. This was of course after the legalization and later
state religion status gaining of Christianity, so a lot of people joined who were
nominal and focused on the world and the flesh in their less obviously sinful
manifestations. It is one thing to weaken social rank problems by Christianizing
them, its another thing to make them the priority in a technically Christian context.

Augustine went on to shut down Pelagian heretical arguments, but created some
problems on his own that didn't bear fruit until the Calvinist disaster in the Reformation.
(Pelagianism denies original sin or ancestral sin has any impact on the individual, and
that one could live a virtuous life and gain paradise without Jesus Christ's work on
the Cross for us. Presently Orthodoxy is plagued with pelagian tendencies about
original sin, mislabeling it as personal guilt for Adam's sin then denying it, but in fact
it is about inherited result, the warp that came into Adam and Eve and passed to us.
A few deny even this, and say it is about the influences around us that lead us wrong.
Jesus Christ is the light that enlightens everyone coming into the world, so apparently
we have some kind of divine enlightenment to start with but because of our sin second
nature sooner or later turn from this to some extent. The Theotokos, the Virgin Mary,
apparently managed to not manifest this sin nature in action and is called immaculate
in that sense, not that she was free of it altogether, by us Orthodox, the transmission of
original/ancestral sin needed only to be blocked in Jesus' case or her womb cleansed
just before the Incarnation, no need for her to be born sin nature free. If that was
needed in order for Jesus to be "prelapsarian" then likewise her mother would need to
have been immaculate back to Eve. Perhaps recognizing this, and instead of rejecting
it as the absurdity it is accepting it, some have argued that the sin nature is only
inherited from the father. what you have you can pass on. if it is limited to a gene on
the male chromosome then no woman has the sin nature so how come all are sinners
to some extent, some very evil ? this is nonsense. The Council of Carthage appeals to
original sin in referring to infant baptism.)

The Secular Humanist movement and Theosophy and a range of stuff all worked in
the same general direction,
and you can find the specific contents online. The general tone is that man is the
measure of all things and God is optional at best.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

PEW research on radicalism in Islam someone's post on another blog Ben Shapiro: The Myth of the Tiny Radical Muslim Minority (YouTube)

According to Pew Research of 2011, 1.6 Billion Muslims in 49 countries where they are the majority. This, combined with other polls found:

Indonesia – world’s most populace Muslim country at 205 million. 50% support Sharia law not only in Indonesia but also the world. (103 million); 70% blame USA, Israel or someone else for 9/11

Egypt – 80 million Muslims. 65% want strict Sharia law worldwide; 70% (52 million) had positive feelings about Bin Laden

Pakistan – 179 million Muslims. 76% want strict Sharia law worldwide (135 million)

Bangladesh – 149 million Muslims. 82% want strict sharia law to be the law of the country (122 million); 66% said honor killings of women can sometimes be justified; 25% believe suicide bombings are sometimes justified

Nigeria – 76 million Muslims. 71% want strict sharia law to the law of the country (54 million)

Iran – 75 million Muslims. 83% want strict sharia law to be the law of the country (62 million)

Turkey – 75 million Muslims. 32% said honor killings of women can sometimes be justified. (24 million)

Morocco – 32 million Muslims 75% want strict sharia law to be the law of the country (25 million)

Iraq – 31 million Muslims. 78% said honor killings of women can sometimes be justified (24 million)

Afghanistan – 24 million Muslims. 99% want strict sharia law to be the law of the country (24 million); 76% said honor killings of women can sometimes be justified

Jordan – 6 million Muslims. 60% support Hamas (4 million)

Palestine – 4 million Muslims. 89% want strict sharia law to be the law of the country (4 million) 78% had positive feelings about Bin Laden; 89% support terror attacks against Israel

France – 5 million Muslims. 35% believe suicide bombings are sometimes justified (2 million)

Great Britain – 3 million Muslims. 78% want cartoonists of Mohammed prosecuted (2 million)

USA – 3 million Muslims 23% said violence against civilians can be justified (0.5 million); 19% favorable toward Al-Qaeda or “didn’t know”

Total in countries surveyed: 942 million
Radicalized Muslims: 680 million
That is a majority – not a minority

Monday, February 27, 2017

Walmart creep fest update

I forgot to mention that in this video it was stated that Walmarts in YEmen
were used for US military staging against the Houthis.

my comment on a Walmart conspiracy video

"this video ref walmart in yemen probably from EUTIMES "An intriguing
Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today
is expressing puzzlement as to why the United States top Special Forces
command, that is currently directing the war in Yemen against Houthi rebel
forces, has this past week taken over a number of Walmart stores in America
and is now converting them to Command and Control (C2) Centres." svr ref
a feature of Sorcha Faal articles which are fraud. There is no walmart in
yemen or anywhere in the Arabian peninsula
so character at time stamp 00:38 is fraud."

Some walmart stores that closed have reopened. Some scenes indicate conversion
to a supercenter was going on. Tunnels exist whether with Walmart connections
or not is unclear, but possible. Indeed, likely.

But this whole Walmart scare is more like "they're onto something but its not
what they think it is" as I like to say.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

Jay Dyer interesting thought

in a lecture on revolutionary thought of all sorts, refuting it, Jay
Dyer noted that they suppose that multiplicity automatically means

But it doesn't.

Jay is a convert to Orthodoxy and notes that in The Holy Trinity
there is multiplicity and NO conflict. This is a model for us all.

(one could argue that with the monarchy of The Father on the one
hand, and the fact They are an odd number while being one, that
if there was a conflict The Father would settle it and/or someone
would make a tie breaking vote. This presupposes conflict that
does not exist in The Holy Trinity, never did never will. But if
someone wants to insist that there must have been some kind of
process or disagreement or whatever, their effort to turn The
Trinity into a debating society is stymied by the fact of the monarchy
of The Father and the fact that The Holy Trinity is three, not two
and not four. However, this said, I agree with Jay Dyer's position,
I just like to consider what someone is likely to think up or may
have already stated somewhere, and answer it ahead of time.

This sort of conflict within a supposedly divine multiplicity is a
feature of polytheism, ancient philosophers tried to argue that
the many "gods" were just manifestations or aspects of one god,
sort of modalism I guess, but it still remained a mess.

The True God is not a "god concept." He is a Person or rather
A unified multiple One that exists as Three Persons.

Someone expressed worry about how the idea of some pagans
about their idols, that these are not the "gods" but the "gods"
receive worship through them, is similar to the attitude of RC
and EO about icons, that the original receives the honor given
the copy. But why this should be an issue going against icons
is ridiculous, this is the argument by Paul against idols that
though they are nothing demons hide behind them and receive
the honor given them. And one honors an image of Christ or
of The Theotokos or lesser saints, and they received the honor
given their images.

The issue is not so much the process as WHO is honored by

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

what Trump and DeVos are actually fighting against

From the comments on Lionel Nation

Below, is what Trump and DeVos are actually fighting against.

Proffesor Mary Grabar's Dissident Prof.:

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Ethnic identity of elites is irrelevant and counterproductive to focus on a distraction

this was posted in youtube comments

Plenty of Jewish people don't rule the World. The vast majority don't. In fact since the elite are a tiny number of people, very good at syphoning off wealth and concentrating it in their familie's hands, they'd always have to be easily identifiable as from one culture or another and they were never going to be a representative sample of anything as large as a cultural group. They are so stinking rich they don't live lives like anyone else including other Jewish people. They may happen to be Jewish (I don't know or care) but what's more distinctive about them is that they are greedy even to the point they will ruin the source of their wealth which is everyone else. It becomes pointless to categorise them as Jewish in that sense even if they are. Really rich people mix with each other and nobody else. They don't belong to the culture they came from originally. They'll extract anyone else's wealth, Jewish people's, black people's, white people's etc.. What do they care where it comes from? If they did they'd have to have less and there's no sign I can see they're interested in that scenario. We've got a lot more in common with anyone in the more than 99 per cent of people who aren't in the elite and more shared interests with them than the elites share with the cultural groups they emerged from. The race/cultural labels can become a distraction that elites benefit from while people misidentify them as part of a larger group. The larger group becomes a target while they are safely tucked away somewhere living it up, suffering no consequences for their avarice. The real divide is between the super rich elites and everybody else. If we keep referring to them as belonging to any other group I think we're obscurring our vision of the pertinent facts. What do you think?"

I think this is very succinct and correct.

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

How It Happened

A urinary hoax.

let me see if I got this right. Some bozo sends this crap, er, piss to the CIA and they put this ("raw intelligence," unvetted, unchecked on etc. etc. the stuff that gets checked and analyzed later) into their classified report on the election.

the references to pizzagate should be taken with a grain of salt as an example of fake news since
although you could say eh, weird about the things in the pizza joints, the bigger picture is the use
of this and related food terms identified by the FBI as pedophile secret code. the oddities in ping pong
pizza incl. the horrific speech by that freak singer who also refers to "special pizza" and may be
hinting at the meat in it being human. all this should be occasion for an investigation.

Friday, January 6, 2017

Stable Blindness in nationalism.

In horse breeding there is something called stable blindness, you can see all that's wrong with others' horses, and nothing that is wrong with your own. Here is a view of America by an outside, same as that of those Americans who have done the research.

from a blog post
"Anonymous Anonymous said...
Your very capital city is built with a map of masonic signs, your government buildings the same, very few of you have ever set foot outside of your goven State let alone country or even the Americas. You have painted blasphemy upon the inside of your Capitol, turning George Washington into a god being lifted up by the angels. Do you know what that painting is called and if so, what those words mean? Then there is a G. Washington statue in that same building depicted as Baphomet, and fascist symbols each side of the speaker of the house: need I go on?
Your United States Union was set up by a bunch of Christ rejecting deists and your country, more often the bad guys than not, has caused more wars than any other in the same time period. You forgot to mention McCarthyism, etc. You also believe that any social justice implemented is de facto Communist. You are the most violent Western country there is, arrogant, insular, and disliked place by right thinking people the World over. Your prison population is one of the largest, if not the largest in the World, many people are without recurse to health care or a proper education if they can't wave enough dollars about, your racial and class divisions are stark and draconian, and most of you have no idea about the places, peoples and cultures you set out to destroy in the World. You are a bunch of mindless bloodthirsty loudmouths, most not all, and no, thankfully I don't live in your arrogant and ignorant (so much so you forget Colombians, Hondurans, Canadians, Mexicans, etc are Americans too, not just those of the USA), uncaring and loveless entity you call America aka the USA.
I hope that answers your question and lets you know how most of the World, and how most Christians around the World (especially in the Middle East and Latin America) see you!"
There is a lot wrong with the USA and the old can't "go live somewhere else " is not an answer. for some of the secret evils and connections behind all this, has real good information lots of links. We talk about the need to repent of sexual immorality, perversion and abortion and of communoid thievery by big government aka taxes, and exalt as "Christian economic principles" something invented in the past two centuries and ignore pride, vainglory, covetousness, greed, ambition, class snobbery, brutality, etc. etc. that typifies American culture even when it was more moral (or better at hiding evil).