Monday, February 23, 2015

Christian Feminism

Paul writes in context of an abusive society and law and 
putting the already dominant man in the role of Christ to 
the church reverses the patriarchal concept of roles of 
the sexes, instead of the woman being the support, the 
nurterer, the long suffering supportive one (and 
expendable), now the man is the support (not necessarily 
financially all the time) the nurterer, the long suffering 
supportive one (but not expendable). 

"to have and to hold" is not about love or relationship, 
it is a term you will find in a real estate deed transfer 
contract it is ABOUT PROPERTY. ownership. The 
man in those old vows accepts the woman as now 
his sole property given to him by her father who now 
no longer owns her. This is not a feminist rant THIS 
WORDS MEAN. google the phrase and add real 
estate or property law.

Everything you are used to, 

#that a woman could even be considered as a 
possible custodial parent in the case of divorce, 

# that she could keep money such as wages or 
property she acquired during the marriage or even
brought into it, 

# that she could vote, 

# hold office,

# be in professions like medicine or law, 

# address a public meeting a mixed sex group meeting, 

# or even be issued a patent by the Patent Office, 
something denied to one woman on an invention 
because she was a woman, but then issued to her 
husband she got to front for her,

# and countless things like wife beating being illegal 
and forced arranged marriages being illegal, allowing 
anesthesia in childbirth and allowing barrier 
contraception (once denounced even when a 
woman's health was at risk, the favorite pessary or 
support for uterine prolapsis was also a barrier 
contraceptive in effect so escaped the prohibition),

 #education for women beyond elementary school, 

you even find a basis for in Scripture, YET THESE 
THE BIBLE since man is head all this other stuff 
were argued as the only proper way.

misunderstanding "one flesh" resulted in such 
statements in American law 1800s as that the two 
become one person, and that person is the husband.
person is not flesh. and the one flesh remains clearly 
distinct beings. A better understanding in earlier 
British law, resulted in forbidding a man to marry the 
sister of a woman he had had sex with, because that 
sex act, in making him one flesh with her, made him
effectively the brother of her sister, so marrying her 
sister would be de facto incest.

reducing marriage to a set of roles undercuts love 
and relationship, it is said "marriage is the death of 
love," and ignoring the one flesh issue makes 
seduction and abandonment easier since 
supposedly a couple is not bound if not legally 
bound. The faithless lover is applauded not 

This twisting of the Scripture IGNORES VARIATION 
FROM THE IDEAL, e.g., the contrast between Paul's
standard for elders and bishops and the reality of his 
appointing young Timothy bishop of Ephesus is 

Of course you never address the issue, that Priscilla 
is addressed BEFORE her husband Aquila, named 
BEFORE him as appropriate to a head of 
household, as often as vice versa by Paul and 
there is mentioned "the church in THEIR house." 

Again, we are told by Paul that we the church are 
to grow up into our Head, Who is Jesus Christ, 
become more like Him, closer to Him, etc., but of 
course there is a limit to this since He is also 
God. Man is the source in a sense of woman - 
which also makes him her model. think amazon 
or tomboy. IF the church should grow into its 
head Jesus Christ, then woman should grow into 
her head, man, and since man is not God this 
means equality with man. Christians whether 
male or female have one model, Jesus Christ 
Who is male. 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

an old of mine from Constance Cumbey's blog, which pretty much sums it up.

I think your real problem is you don't like anti Republican

FACT: they are not what they pretend to be. They are materialist new Age to the core Reagan and wife were semi occultists, promoted make believe haze and enchantment in his style and speaking.

FACT: The Bible is as against the 1% as against some of Occupy stuff.

FACT: There is no rapture except to greet The Lord at His return AFTER the tribulation. Rapture doctrine UNHEARD OF BEFORE 1800s and helped by proto New Age organizations

FACT: I have had some extremely odd experiences, and learned that certain things like the sign of the Cross made with faith and precision and intent and Holy Water work against them. Some of the wierdest involved physical effects which prove (a) energy feed vampirism is real when I was the target, and (b) New Age info on the "energy body" is DEAD WRONG (energy system is part of the soul, which term in Hebrew covers both immortal and interface between body and soul and body and spirit as continuum as well as a distinct element in that continuum, and validated by Ecclesiastes 12, but again the New Age info is as wrong on that as it is on "consciousness")

FACT: once you begin looking at the sort of things Cumbey uncovers, if you keep looking you will find stuff invalidating BOTH parties and a lot of American as well as unAmerican values as well.

FACT: all govt. intervention is not harmful, without govt. involvement intrepreneurs would not have gotten anywhere as much done.

FACT: America has been fascination with the occult back to early times. Earlier The Enlightenment was a major attack on Christinaity, ditto masonry occult conspiracy against Christianity before Besant

FACT: Pentecostal/Charismatic movement is infected from the start especially because of unbiblical emphasis on "tongues" mishandling Scripture, and "waiting for The Spirit," a mediumistic sort of misapplication of Scripture about a one time only event in the past. God may have used some of these people to get your attention on Jesus, but you need to get away from all this.

GOOGLE KUNDALINI AND CHARISMATIC TOGETHER, Then ask yourself why these people are so whole hog hypnotized by the Republithugs. The Dummycrooks are no better.
9:30 AM
Blogger Christine Erikson (aka Justina) said...
FACT: both parties are financed by pretty much the same people. public stance on morals/religion mean nothing as long as the people who own them get their way.

FACT: the first or maybe second political party we had, was the anti masonic party. We need another one only a bit more fine tuned, and aiming at the more complex New Age of both materialist and spiritual forms. All the "third parties" now are jokes or bad in their own right.

when all branches of govt are staffed by people with loyalties that transcend their offices, and they all collaborate, you NO LONGER HAVE CHECKS AND BALANCES.

FACT: The Bible read cover to cover in a short period of time so you don't get a piecemeal effect, 4 months maximum, will show you no one form of government or economic theory that God unreservedly endorses, other than the monarchic rule of His Son when He comes back.

FACT: as shown by Cumbey and Herescope, there is an appalling similarity between the eschatology of the New Age and the eschatology and ecclesiology of the charismatic new apostles, etc. etc. teachers, which should tell you something right there.

St. Paul speaks of being puffed up and made emptier, and entering into visions which you have not seen.

FACT: There is a VERY uncomfortable similarity between the USA and Babylon the Great.

FACT: St. Peter in one of his epistles says we should live in sobriety as well as godliness in expectation of Christ. "sober and godly" doesn't incl. running around in a blissed out state, that you think is the Holy Spirit, but leaves you open to all sorts of influences and ideas without discernment, inhibits you from testing spirits or ideas, and hardly differs from drugs or New Age consciousness warping exercizes effects, and ends up with talking with spirits that are never tested, accepting blindly whatever nonsense is presented in dreams visions or statements from departed relatives about having the resurrection body in heaven, which is a lie because that is a PHYSICAL body we get later when brought to life again by Jesus Christ at His Second Coming, or transformed into that condition if still alive when He comes back, praying by concentrating on the person prayed for instead of on God, not to mention other false prophecies and then making excuses.

It doesn't matter a ministry denounces occultism of obvious sort, if they promote styles of prayer and worship that cause trances states and wild behavior

Sure some of these people may be able to cast out demons, but that is about the power of Jesus Name, not their own holiness, note Jesus' warnings about some such at the Last Judgement in Matthew 25 I think it is "did we not cast our demons and do miracles in Your Name?" they ask and He answers "depart from Me, I have not known you workers of iniquity."

And maybe the reason they have to do so much exorcism, is because they and their followers and the people who come to them from similar contexts are doing something that attracts demons in the first place.

FACT: some of the manifestations such as at IHOP and others, involve symptoms and sequences that parallel the awakening of the so called kundalini energy in tantric hinduism and New Age borrows from it. That cannot be a good sign.
9:30 AM

Friday, February 13, 2015

This is the modern science that supports my thesis A Possible History of Life on Mars

the claim that "moving a human nucleus into an empty animal egg"
would result in something 99.95 human has to be wrong, because
the mitochondrial DNA in the egg, outside the nucleus, is as much
if not more as the nuclear DNA and we don't know exactly what it

I think that this happened before The Flood and the results, some
of them, were offworld when The Flood hit, and the aliens we see
now are their descendants.

yet another conspiracy flowchart

These used to be all the rage in the 1960's through the 1980's
slacking off a bit in the 1990's and 2000's. While this is a parody
aiming at discrediting everything, it is not without merit, and
while some issues it discusses
a. are as idiotic as it makes out (big pharma and food cures)
b. do not fit as and either/or but usually are part of the same scenario
(Roswell and Alien Autopsy)

there is a lot to be said for some of the conspiracies. The House
Committee on Assassinations came to the OFFICIAL conclusion
that yes, JFK was killed pursuant to a conspiracy, but they couldn't
figure out which one, and sent the matter to the DOJ, which at the
time was run by people who were part of the mindset and connections
of the conspirators or some of them, so naturally nothing was done.

Another flaw in this determination, was that they did not apparently
consider the possibility that all the conspiracies were involved in
the assassination, that it came about as a result of a perfect storm
of converging interests in seeing Kennedy dead.

Not unlike my theory on the conflicting conspiracy theories about
the Black Dahlia.