Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Theotokos Queen of Heaven

I keep running into the idea on facebook, that Mary is not the mother of God because she
provided no divinity only humanity to Jesus Christ. This is assuming that to be a mother
one must be strictly an origin and that nothing else matters or can be in play. (which of
course ignores adoption.) Theotokos is better translated Birth Giver of God (in the flesh).
Jesus is God The Second Person of the Holy Trinity in the flesh. He was this from His
conception on, He did not acquire divinity later. WHAT CAME OUT OF MARY'S WOMB
WAS BOTH GOD AND MAN. Therefore she is mother of God Incarnate because she gave
birth to Jesus Who is incarnate God.

the very narrow mechanistic understanding of Protestantism is inherited in part from Roman
Catholic scholasticism, but Roman Catholicism was inhibited from taking things too far because
they inherited a tradition from Orthodoxy which they had broken from in AD 1054 (the real
beginning of Roman Catholicism as a separate church), which was rooted in intense Scripture
study.

The fathers of the first Council of Nicea hesitated to use the word homoousios same essence
because this word, though it accurately consolidated Scripture teaching, was not itself in
the Bible, you would think they were a bunch of sola scriptura people!

The pagans had a "queen of heaven" false goddess, and this is pointed to by those objecting
to this title for Mary, and the doctrine though extant among believers was not official required
belief until declared in the 1800s. The argument for it in RC was that the Jewish queens
were never the wives of kings, but their mothers.

This practice provided some continuity between the deceased prior king and his son the
then current king. In the Kings or Chronicles it is recorded that a righteous king had
deposed his mother from being queen because she had sacrificed to false gods.

Thursday, November 9, 2017

ROTFLMAO dept. 1 TheRighteousness of Judge Moore

"Bannon said opponents of Moore are "out to destroy him.... Because they cannot take the righteousness the people like Judge Moore represent.""
http://bvtnews.com/politics/steve-bannon-establishment-hates-roy-moores-righteousness.html

so he represents all this righteousness no one can stand and it turns out he's fooling
around with teenaged girls one as young as 14. Of course this means he's cheating on
his wife and cheating on the girls most likely. Not to mention taking advantage of
youthful impressionability and stupidity or perhaps weak mindedness if he kinda
bulldogged them into this.

Trump seems to have surrounded himself with idiots, Bannon being a case in point.

Monday, October 9, 2017

40% of people are peer pressure susceptible



timestamp 5:26 an experiment showed that 40% of people will go along to get along
even when the answer provided is blatantly wrong.

how this translates to politics and morals is interesting. Just about everything shows
some influence by trend setters and so forth over the decades. 

while you're worrying about not obeying but questioning authority, you might
take a look at not obeying but questioning the authority of the herd. St. Paul warns
against both imitating and against being different for its own sake. in the latter
category you get both at once - being counter culture by showing by some
clothing or whatever that you are "different" which involves imitating the style
that says all this.

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Max Planck Institute and Neanderthals

Recently I found that Neadnerthal DNA (not mitochondrial but nuclear DNA) is
in whites and Asians, but not pure African blacks. 2-4% but up to 5% in
Romanians. interesting.

Also, that a lot of genes for bad stuff are from the Neanderthal genome.

Neanderthal had as much or more brain size as us, ditto Cro Magnon, but
Neanderthal was stockier and stronger and probably had less need of tools.
Fine work could be done with teeth and nails, so their tools were cruder.
So their physical culture was inferior to Cro Magnon. Also they were the
sort of apish looking "primitive" sorts that would have been dismissed
as untermenschen under the old Nazi physiology ideas. So I figured this
essentially messed up the aryanist thing, we are the hybrid descendants
of a subhuman, Africans the pure human or at least uncontaminated by
recessive mutations from a peculiar population, so much for white
superiority since white skin and red hair seem to have come from the
Neanderthal.

Oops. Seems the Planckians are putting a "hybrid vigor" spin on this,
consistent with Darwinian survival of the fittest evolutionism (which has
always translated into social Darwinism which means enslaving and
exterminating lesser type humans and to hell with the poor).

Even said genes from NEanderthal were "advantageous" including
that some diabetes 2 related thing is good for you, so let the Asiatic
branch of hybrid human keep on being hungry I guess.  Supposedly
the ability to quit cigarettes is Neanderthal, but I read of addiction
capability genes being from Neanderthal.

Essentially, these people can't get their Germanic superiority out of their
guts, so they spin anything that could go against it in its favor.

As Shoebat has said (or was it one of his writers) European superiority
didn't come from genetics, but from Christian civilization (and I would
add some congruence of historical and geographic influences, which
included Roman Empire civilizing the half naked screaming hyped up
head hunting human sacrificing probably cannibalistic at times Nordic
type humans in NW and northern Europe).

Monday, August 14, 2017

patterns of anonymice

anonymice are anonymous posters on Cumbey's blog (or anywhere for that matter).
with a couple of exceptions the most vicious attacks on me came from anonymice
though a couple of them sign a name at the end of the post, but it is not in the post
opening line with a link.

They and some others exhibit certain patterns. One of them is apparently
Dorothy Margraf, who can be excused because she is a convert to Judaism
(went looking for some kind of social experience, not theological truth she
admitted), and is obsessed with Nazism as the sole relevant feature of the New
Age movement (yes, its there, the kind of evolutionary mysticism that sooner
or later moves to racial groups and their role allegedly in the world, including
that some are holdovers of prior root races doomed to extinction, if the New
Ager writing is close enough to Blavatsky thinking). Margraf doesn't want
Christian theological and bible interpretation issues cluttering up the place.
Or EU politics that aren't obviously about resugent Nazism.

But aside from her, what are the motives for the others? here's how they go.

post something showing that a new ager like Icke can admit something is
seriously wrong with humans at a basic level, which is an admission of
original sin even if officially denied by the writer/speaker, and therefore
can be used in apologetics and evangelism, and you are condemned as
a new ager.

post something about chakras being real and energy work real, and THEREFORE
dangerous and that new age ideas and practices regarding chakras derange
them creating problems in the nervous system inclining you to a happy
psychotic delusionary experience called "enlightenment" where you have a
serious breakdown of boundaries between you and the rest of the world, either
in just your mind or worse yet your own soul boundaries become blurred
and you are easier to manipulate or permeate or invade paranormally,

and you are condemned as a witch and a new ager.

the latest thing, is that Craig, who although dishonest seems to be motivated
mostly by his own pride and ambition not by any covert occultist agenda,
is now targeted by RayB (signed but anonymous) and an anonymous because
he is calling out one Thomas Dahlheimer, a worse case scenario new ager,
on his posts, and showing the irrationality of his belief system while making
sure first he knows just what that belief system in Dahlheimer's case consists
of so there are no straw men (which is honest enough but also practical),

and he is attacked as engaging in encouraging (and reproducing when
quoting) the spew of garbage by Dahlheimer.

I mentioned something about new age spirituality being the ground for
the politics and an anonymous reacts that all know this already, well,
NO there are hundreds of lurkers on blogs that never post, and learn
something from all this.

Ignored likewise is the importance of the argument with Dahlheimer,
that some new age inclined or gnostic inclined (similar) people reading
this have their belief system challenged and undermined, and Christians
get tools to use in arguments with such.

the anonymous and/or RayB (one of those who lied and said I'd posted
then deleted an ad for psychic services) then arrogantly tells Craig
to quit it and move this to another venue, but this person has no
authority to tell Craig this, and Constance who DOES have the authority
to do so has, on the contrary, endorsed the discussion as very important.

So what gives?

I suspect one of the players at least is a witch of some sort who doesn't
want his or her game ruined by ideas that undermine the world view
and the style of operating.

whether it is the same person or another, one of the anonymice routinely
defends my biological so called mother the witch bitch monster (who had
the gall to call my grandmother a witch bitch) despite repeated statements
she engaged in paranormal invasion of me. paul does the same but less
so unless he is an anonymous when he wants to run hog wild and give up
all pretense to class.

sounds like these people or person are child abusers of the paranormal and
mind control sorts of enslavers.

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Banned by Joe McNeil from The Micro Effect

the broadcasters at TME The Micro Effect seem to be of what I call the
patriot militia sort, and include at least one Christian Identity nut case
who accepted the absurd statement by a guest on her show, that Ruth
was a levite princess. There were no rulers from the tribe of Levi, no
princes no kings ergo no princesses. the biblical illiteracy of many who
bases heresies of doctrine and heresies of history allegedly on the Bible
knows no limits.

I nailed her in the chatroom as to whether a non white who accepted
Jesus Christ could be saved, after hemming and hawing she said that
would be up to God but essentially, no.  when I rephrased it as you
are saying a non white can't be saved or words like that, she didn't
deny this.

McNeil hosts Constance Cumbey, probably because he can use her
anti new age and anti globalist one worldism as bait to get listeners
to hear the others she doesn't run with, and/or to focus some listeners
on the insidious nature of all this as it can be seen to affect their
interests, particularly since Constance has highlighted the infiltration
of the New Age into churches (the new age Bailey eschatology is
very similar to that of hyper charismatics by the way, it was an
approving new ager observer of this who got her attention on it) and
the other issues (racism, neo confederatism, Christian Identity Anglo
Saxonism, etc.) being rejected by churches can be viewed (wrongly)
as the result of this. All he or any has to do is take Constance's
warnings, which do NOT support this, in some cases she lists these
things as part of the NEw Age interests and products tracking back to
theosophy and other occultism and http://visup.blogspot.com
documents occultist origins to the patriot movement that claims to
oppose occultism, can you spell controlled opposition? and then
spin the new age issue to support the McNeil gang issues.

So I was in the chatroom and some wannabe cop killer was putting
forth leading questions, obviously looking for validation and maybe
converts to some group (get talking, find like minded, arrange
contact offline, etc.) and I nipped it at stage one. The issue of the
sin of pride came up, the legitimacy of the 16th amendment (income
tax) and the crazy idea that "we are still under the Articles of
confederation," and the Constitution is not valid.

McNeil was in the chatroom. I had posted one link already debunking
some idea, and was looking for another (which I will include here).
Someone asked why I was there when I disagreed with their beliefs,
I answered I was only there for Constance's show and had stayed over,
and found that I couldn't post. McNeil was asked are you reading
the posts and he said he was. After I couldn't post a bit later I
couldn't get to the chatroom at all. Then I couldn't even get on the
page to listen to any program, "403: forbidden."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester_Sixteenth_Amendment_arguments#Benson_contentions

as you can see, the alleged illegality of the 16th amendment hinges on
inconsequential errors in transmission of the text to the state legislatures,
which did not affect meaning but were punctuation and capitalization
Other issues raised were even more worthless.

Well, Joe McNeil has banned me from even listening to his satellite
radio using the internet page.

Constance was persuaded, that her disreputable company she is forced
to keep on the air, by broadcasting from his station, though they are
not on her show, that Joe believes in freedom of speech and therefore
these people should have a platform.

I think not. McNeil showed by his actions towards me, that freedom of
speech is not his primary agenda. I think the only reason he got her
to be on his station, is that he has his uses for her information. A lot of
(admittedly new age influenced) groups are hostile to some parts of
the new age movement, especially the anti national sovereignty and
anti racism public elements. (new age actually is often covertly
racist but up front is another matter.)