Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Dogon Mystery Debunked on a UFO site


Seems there was misinterpretation and information contamination and
errors in the whole "Dogon Mystery."

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Rise of the Planet of the Apes

I am watching this movie now, on cable.  The thought occurred to me,
maybe this is how apes came to be. Recall that I am working on a
theory of extraterrestrial humanoid life as originating in Pre Flood
mad scientist efforts to engineer humans to fit in extreme environments.

The original Planet of the Apes story indicated that the revolt started
because humans, making ape servants smarter with human DNA,
crossed a line and had something as smart as - but stronger than -
humans and able to speak. (How the humans lost the ability to speak
was not to my memory clearly explained, perhaps some of their
scientists removed the ability? no matter, that is all fiction.)

This movie has the problem begin with an alzheimer's research project,
with unintended results.

Perhaps in the distant past, the pre Flood mad scientists decided to
engineer powerful workers by mixing human DNA with lemurs and
monkeys, and developed ape category. (Probably got a bit out of hand.
But they were never all THAT smart, and couldn't talk, and went feral.
Some of these were taken on the Ark, since they were now among the
creatures that live on Earth that God determined to save some of each.
Or maybe an early effort at recreating that lost evil civilization, part
of which was the Tower of Babel. I doubt any of the ziggurats we
know of now were that tower, after all, there were many aiggurats,
perhaps a kind of cargo cult mentality regarding that tower, and the
original tower was never completed. Probably eventually destroyed,
maybe by using its remains as foundation stones for the later
ziggurats, as good luck in the effort.)

Maybe that is why there is so much genetic similarity between us and
the great apes. They are artificial, a result of ancient horrible experiments.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Teleportation To Mars?

As some who read the blogosphere and watch youtube and alternative
UFO stuff know by know, one Andrew Basiago and someone else
claim to have been teleported to Mars, where there is a colony base
from Earth (and some predatory animals) as part of a secret CIA
project, and even met Obama there on a visit.

Disinformation is usually mostly facts, presented in a way and
context to make it look too loopy to be credible, or with some
lies thrown in the whole thing packaged so as to put you off a
productive track of research, and onto a wrong track.

It was developed by spy agencies during the Cold War and certainly
predates that, but not under that name most likely.

Now, I think it unlikely that such a project is going to be allowed
to be leaked if it existed. Maybe Basiago was public enough no
one could dare kill him, but where is the effort to prove he is
insane and/or never worked where he said he did or stuff like that?

I suspect that many leaks are disinfo, which doesn't mean they
aren't substantially factual, you just have to be careful and not
swallow the whole thing.

Such leaks might be to get us used to the idea of existing off record
and black budget projects in space.

It might also be, that exactly such a base exists (and the predatory
animals), and Basiago is an agent whose purpose is to make it
look ridiculous by throwing in teleportation and Obama.

There have been a lot of photo analysis articles online, which
show evidence of artificial structures and activity and wreckage
and currently functional stuff on Mars and the Moon. Basiago
would be a good ploy to discredit the idea.

Which means yes, we got a base there, yes if you decide to get
your anti gravity act together and go investigate you'd better
be careful of the predatory animals, and no, we don't use
teleportation and Obama is not in the loop.


Sunday, January 22, 2012

Why South Carolina's Values Are Not America's Values

While Alternet often supports things I oppose, like gay equality and 

abortion "rights," part of the knee jerk tendency of both left and right
to package irrelevant things in one worldview and program, this is 
something worth reading.


Why South Carolina's Values Are Not America's Values

 Since CNN has assured us that the South is "where values matter" in advance of today's South Carolina primary, it's worth considering just what South Carolina values are, courtesy Thomas Schaller in Whistling Past Dixie (pp.274-275)
Consider South Carolina, which has opposed or defied almost every beneficent social and political change in American history. To appease South Carolinian slaveholders, Thomas Jefferson removed language condemning slavery from the Declaration of Independence. Four years later, backcountry loyalists in South Carolina helped the British Army recapture the state in 1780 from the patriots. By 1828, Palmetto State native and vice president John C. Calhoun was agitating for state "nullification" of federal powers, generating secessionist calls a full generation before the outbreak of the Civil War.
On December 20, 1860, South Carolina became the first state to secede; four months later Confederate forces in Charleston fired the opening shots of the Civil War on the Union garrison at Fort Sumter, and South Carolina even threatened to secede from the Confederacy because the other southern states would not agree to reopening the slave trade. Soon after the state's chapter of the Ku Klux Klan formed, "red shirt" Democratic rifle clubs used physical intimidation and ballot manipulation to alter results of the 1876 election. In the 1890s, Governor Ben "Pitchfork" Tillman--who earned his nickname by threatening to stab President Grover Cleveland in the ribs with said implement--served two terms as governor before embarking on a twenty-three-year Senate career during which he defended segregation as vigilantly as his fellow Edgefield County native, Strom Thurmond, later did for most of his career.
Well into the twentieth century, South Carolina's black citizens observed the Fourth of July mostly alone because the vast majority of whites refused to, preferring instead to celebrate Confederate Memorial Day, May 10. State politicians repeatedly averted their eyes as textile industry executives employed children and quashed attempts by mill workers to organize for fair wages. In 1920, the South Carolina legislature rejected the proposed women's suffrage amendment and took almost a half century finally to ratify it, in 1969. In 1948, the same year the South Carolina legislature declared President Harry Truman's new civil rights commission "un-American," Thurmond's full-throated advocacy of racial segregation as the States' Rights Democratic Party presidential nominee helped him carry four Deep South states. Six years later, the Clarendon County school district--where per-pupil spending on whites was quadruple that for blacks--was pooled with three other districts in a failed defense of the "separate but equal" standard in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case. And when Congress passed the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the law that finally banned the creative and vicious methods used to disfranchise blacks, South Carolina became the first state to challenge its constitutionality. By 1968 Harry Dent, the most legendary of Thurmond's political proteges and a key artchitect of the "southern strategy," was helping Richard Nixon translate racial antagonisms into crucial Republican votes, a victory in South Carolina, and a ticket to the White House.
If all of this seems like so much ancient history, consider that South Carolinians are still debating the merits of public displays of the Confederate battle flag. Indeed, more than a few pundits believe Republican David Beasley won the 1994 governor's race in part because of his pledge to support displaying the Confederate flag over the state capitol--then promptly lost his 1998 reelection bid later after a "religious epiphany" caused him to reverse position. After two decades of adverse judicial rulings, in 2000 Bob Jones University, the state's largest private liberal arts college, founded by its anti-Catholic namesake, finally ended its policy of prohibiting interrracial dating. Last year, South Carolina was sued for issuing "choose life" vanity plates while refusing the same option to pro-choice citizens, justifying its decision by claiming that the anti-abortion message constitutes protected government speech. Today, more than eight decades after women first won the right to vote, the South Carolina state legislature is the only one in America where women do not hold at least 10 percent of all seats.
Other Deep South states may stake their own claims, but South Carolina is America's most conservative state. From a strictly constitutional-historical standpoint, its legacy of firsts and lasts reads like a rap sheet: first to overturn a provincial government during the revolutionary period; last to abandon the Atlantic slave trade; first to call for nullifying the Constitution's federal authority; first to secede from the Union; last to abolish the white primary; first to litigate against the intregration of public schools and challenge the Voting Rights Act. Whenever America finds itself at some social or political crossroad and in need of direction, perhaps the best things to do is ask, "What would South Carolina do?" And then do the opposite.
I'm sure there are many wonderful people in South Carolina fighting the good fight, trying to turn their home state around and move away from the shameful legacy of South Carolina values. But in democracy, majority rules. And the majority of South Carolinians have made it clear exactly what those values are.
They are not American values, and CNN should be ashamed to imply that they are.
By David Atkins | Sourced from Hullabaloo 

Posted at January 21, 2012, 9:47 am

Saturday, January 14, 2012

World War 3 in the making

The usual cant is that various military ventures of the USA are illegal.
Actually, none of them are or were. The Constitution specifies that it
and ALL TREATIES ratified are the supreme law of the land, regardless
of what any state constitution or laws say. All these actions were done
under the cover of NATO or the UN or the Asian NATO similar
treaty (that was used to excuse Viet Nam).

That does not mean that the US isn't using these treaties, to legalize
imperialism abroad which means predation against its own people at
home. Who is the main warrior arm for these? the USA. Who is making
decisions? I don't know, but I can assume that the USA is a big player
in making those decisions.

Back to square one, the hidden agenda. Right now, those who are perhaps
devoted to American empire, and may be in the elite class but more USA
biassed like Zbig are arguing against war with Iran. A Mossad retired
officer is saying such a war would be a disaster.

Iran is backed by Russia and China. To go to war with them will mean
war with Russia and China and we cannot win.

I think two things are involved, delusions (perhaps fuelled by black budget
projects that work enough it is thought they will let us win, ignoring that
similar projects have been going on in Russia and China), and deliberate
intent to fight a losing war, with our elites having sold us out to the Russian
Mafia who might well be major players in the financial scene in a Russian
occupied or rather annexed ex USA. Of course, the western half will probably
be annexed by China.

Now I find out that American warships are in The Black Sea. Before this
USA provocations involving placement of missiles in range of Russia to
supposedly defend against Iranian missiles headed for Europe, but which
could be used on Russia with a minor tweak most likely, went on.

I thought we were taking bait in going after Iran. But I think it is more
deliberate than that. Our leaders WANT WW 3. For whatever reason. And
I doubt we can win. In fact, I am sure we cannot.

So, pray this not happen; or that if it does all the banksters, elites and mafia
categories and atrocity inclined sorts on all sides die before the dust settles;
and in the meantime, depending on what part of the country you live in,
start learning to speak Russian or Chinese. Or both.

Monday, January 2, 2012

ESF runs the Federal Reserve and is itself run by the Treasury Department and is part of black ops funding


The Federal Reserve is an unconstitutional delegation of
economic power by the govt., so the information here at
first glance looks like it is a good thing, that the Treasury
Department has kept or regained the power it was supposed
to have always had, and without any central bank in the

But look closer. This power is exerted by means of a cutout,
that is itself veiled from view, and means that the elites in
that nest of vipers, the unelected elements of government
typically the State Department but probably also sometimes
the Treasury Department or whoever in it works with or for
the elites, can manipulate political events and economy here
and economy abroad, to the advantage of themselves as a
class, themselves as individuals, and to no advantage of the
American people.

NASA former employee whistleblower


Former National Aeronautics and Space Administration Data and Photo Control Department manager, Ken Johnston, who worked for the space agency’s Lunar Receiving Laboratory during the Apollo missions has been fired for telling the truth.

Ken Johnston working at JPL.
Johnston asserts NASA knows astronauts discovered ancient alien cities and the remains of amazingly advanced machinery on the Moon. Some of the technology can manipulate gravity.
He says the agency ordered a cover-up and forced him to participate in it. Over the past 40 years other scientists, engineers and technicians have accused NASA of cover-ups and obscuring data.
The growing number of accusers’ allegations range from hiding information about anomalous space objects and lying about the discovery of artifacts on the surface of the Moon and Mars, to denying the evidence of life reported back by the Viking lander during the mid-1970s.
Strange Object Photoed by Apollo Astronauts.
According to Johnston, Apollo astronauts brought back photographic evidence of the artifacts they found during their lunar extravehicular activities (EVAs). Johnston claims NASA ordered him to destroy the EVA images while he was at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), but he refused.
When he went public, the space agency terminated him. In a news release, Kay Ferrari, the JPL Director of the SSA Program, explained why she asked Johnston to resign: he had publicly criticized his employer. When Johnston refused to tender his resignation, he was summarily dismissed without cause.
After his abrupt departure, he indicated he’d had enough and was tired that the U.S. government had been sitting on the proof for more than four decades that ancient alien cities are the Moon.
Russian Lunik 13 photo of artificial, maufactured object…
“I have nothing to lose,” he said. “I quarreled with NASA and I got fired.” Evidence has emerged of large structures, perhaps even a base on the far side if the Moon, that seems to support Johnston’s allegations.
The scientist who oversaw the important life-detection experiment aboard the 1976 Viking space probe mission on Mars continues to blast the U.S. space agency.
Gilbert Levin insists his biology experiment proved life is in the Martian soil.
“We obtained positive data corresponding with all the pre-mission criteria, which proved the existence of microbial life in the soil of Mars,” Levin told National Geographic. “I Found Life on Mars in 1976, Scientist Says” The prominent scientist is so angry at NASA he’s even created his own website designed to shout to the world that life really is on the Red Planet.
Many space scientists have challenged NASA about yet another fraud the agency allegedly perpetrated for decades: the color of the Martian sky.
For years the space agency released photos of Mars with a reddish tinged sky and rusty red landscape. They got away with it too until independent researchers and Mars missions undertaken by the European Space Agency (ESA) revealed that the Martian sky actually looked very similar to Earth’s sky–and the Martian landscape pretty much resembled the pale salmon colored terrain of the American Southwest.
Holger Isenberg has written about it on the German site “The Color of Mars.” Here’s a translated link with the photographic evidence.
Former NASA employee, Donna Hare, has accused NASA of doctoring, obfuscating, and obscuring thousands of photos over the years. She has gone on record alleging the space agency erased inconvenient anomalies on certain damning photos.
During her time at NASA she was a specialist working as an illustrator and photographic slide technician. Her service awards include the 1969 Apollo Achievement award, a Skylab award, and a special commemorative medallion for meritorious service involving the joint American-Russian space mission, Apollo-Soyuz.
A technical illustrator by profession, Hare has just about done it all during her tenure with the space agency, working as a space illustrator and in the Precision Slide Lab. She illustrated space vehicles, satellites, launch pads, landing sites, lunar maps and much, much more.

Did NASA miss smudging this photo?
Hare worked as a sub-contractor with the agency for more than 15 years. When she blew the whistle on NASA, she went public and appeared as a guest on WOL-AM radio in Washington, D.C. Her testimony is controversial and some support her contentions while others do not.
“In December of 1972 Apollo 17 astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt spent about 75 hours on the Moon. During their lunar expedition they took the photo seen above. As incredible as it sounds it appears to be the severed head of a robot. As Cernan put it, even though he was seeing it with his own eyes, he still couldn’t quite bring himself to believe it,” writes author Joe Szostak in his book and website.
“After overcoming his initial shock he realized that it couldn’t be a human skull. After all, it was lying in a debris field from an impact crater, which had tossed up all manner of junk and material from just below the valley floor. Something as fragile as a fossilized bone could not possibly survive such an impact.
“Furthermore, exposure to extreme solar and cosmic radiation would have long since reduced organic material to a fine powder. This object was unmistakably of mechanical origin. Color enhancements showed that the ‘head’ had a distinctive red stripe around the area where the upper lip should be, a feature that clearly appeared to be painted or anodized on the object.
“Composites of other frames showed that the ‘head’ had two eye-sockets, a forehead, brow ridges, a nose with nostrils, twin cheek bones and the upper half of the jaw. The lower jaw seemed to be missing.
“Cernan dubbed the area ‘one mysterious looking place.’ Many of the rocks had highly unusual spectral qualities, reflecting light more like crystals or highly polished metallic boxes.
“The Aristarchus Crater enigma is one of numerous so-called transient lunar phenomena (TLP). It is the brightest spot on the Moon as seen from Earth, which changes color, sometimes producing a red or bluish glow, and appears to emit gas. In 1958 Aristarchus Crater’s strange phenomena were observed by Russian astronomer Nikolai Kozyrev. They were also reported by the crew of Apollo 11.
The incredible Hubble photo of perfect pyramid on the moon.

“The nature of the crater phenomena has given credence to a theory that there could be some sort of a power device, possibly a fusion reactor, in the crater. On any photo published by NASA except for a Clementine image this object is shown as a bright white smudge with no definition [Emphasis added]. This structure appears to be supported by 5 or 6 arches. In the foreground is a road that leads to a brightly lit tunnel entrance.” ‘Joe Szostak’
Russian Luna 9 photographs space vehicle
“Luna 9 was an unmanned space probe of the Soviet Union’s Luna program. On February 3, 1966 Luna 9 became the first spacecraft to achieve a soft landing on any planetary body other than Earth and to transmit photographic data back to Earth from the Moon. [The] photo is from the Luna 9 probe. It shows what appears to be a large craft or vehicle whose shape resembles that of an ocean going ship on Earth, coming to a point at one end and having an elevated section on top. A cable or tube appears to extend from the rear of the object toward the surface. Contact with Luna 9 was lost on February 6, 1966 just three days after landing.”
Odd things are on the Moon and Mars. Strange things have been found on the Martian moon Phobos, Saturn’s moon Titan, and a handful of other more obscure moons.
The evidence seems to be mounting that we were not always alone in the Solar System. In fact the place seemed downright crowded. Maybe it still is…

Hillary Clinton potentially indictable on election contribution felony