Some Christians are worried that some kind of transgenic changes will be made in people that
make them unredeemable. some connect this to the mark of the beast, sci fi-ed into some kind
of weird technology when Revelation just says its an identifier not of the individual as such, but
of the wearer as one who has worshipped the antichrist. then there's the nephilim
nonsense and some fear there are modern nephilim hybrids and figure if they have even one non
human gene they are not savable.
Enoch only spoke of the first generation spawn of the fallen angels as irrevocably cursed
along with their fathers. Nothing about more dilute generations.
And if Noah being pure in his generatins meant genetics, instead of spiritual and moral purity
throughout all the generations he lived through, then ONLY Noah was pure and that means his
wife and sons and daughters in law and therefore us are NOT pure.
Amazong how this common sense point is missed by these people, and those who think of it
argue God would have provided him a pure mate. But the Bible says ONLY Noah was pure
in all his generations. This was said when he already had sons. so they were not pure whether
its genetics or morals and spiritual issues.
The DNA change fears are a demonic deception designed likely to cause
despair among many and even violence towards the innocent by some.
"Anthony Patch believes it will change human DNA and render us unredeemable. I 100% agree ...
like the Days of Noah, and the fallen angel technology..."
Jesus compared the times of Noah to the last day in terms of unbelievers TAKEN BY SURPRISE
not expecting the Flood or the wrath of God because not believing the warnings.
your DNA has nothing to do with redeemability the Bible proves it Rev. 5:13 all manner of creatures
even in the sea praising God. IF NON HUMAN IDENTITY DOES NOT KEEP YOU OUT
OF THE NEW HEAVENS AND NEW EARTH AND KINGDOM OF HEAVEN neither will transgenics
or DNA morphing by CERN or anything else. (animals are souls also per Genesis listing them as
having the breath of life, and Ecclesiastes 3:21 says animals have spirits. it is not having a spirit
that makes us in the image of God it is character and implications of the bodily format.)
Enoch says nothing about any plan to corrupt the bloodlline, only lust. only the first generation
of hybrids the spawn of the fallen angels was condemned, no subsequent generations of partbreds
were even mentioned. have you got nephilim genes? do you love Jesus? do you determine to
follow Jesus regardless of contrary thoughts you might have? stop worrying about your genes.
Being fallen we are ontologically corrupt, body and soul and spirit. a little genetic wierdness
can't make it much worse. original/ancestral sin, remember?
Nothing to do with technology, which is irrelevant to redeemability anyway as is ancestry.
"and New Age deception no doubt that our "alien ancestors" are visiting planet earth will likely be
part of the deception." more likely they are HUMANS who were genetically modified.
" ...Alien abduction accounts...are nothing more than demonic deception.
This has been proven by people who cry out the name of Jesus, and the so-called abduction stops
immediately. "
Greer etc. are the last people to pay attention to. Alien abduction is very real not fake illusion because
it leaves physical injuries, pregnancies some ultrasounded visible that are recovered to apparently an
artificial womb but need a jump start in a real one during the third month, and physical trace evidence
such as fluorescent hand prints etc. Greer denies the reality of these events or blames military
secret operations pretending to be aliens MILABS.
THESE ALIEN PEOPLE ARE INVOLVED WITH DEMONS. no question about that. BUT THE SAME
BLOCKING EFFECT BY CALLED ON JESUS OR REBUKING IN HIS NAME ALSO HAPPENS IN FACING
DOWN WITCHCRAFT AND PSYCHIC ATTACK BY PHYSICAL LIVING HUMANS. even if all they can do
is from demon helpers, that doesn't change the physical reality of the people who do it.
The Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs and Derrel Sims research showing the evil ways and intents of the
aliens is rejected by Greer etc. and these researchers have been denounced as "rogue" because they
show the truth - this is evil not loving, physical not spiritual but with a spiritual component which is evil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbbBRHeOUXs
Some say aliens were leaving anyway you just woke up right at the end. NO. the aliens have been
backed off while being seen first approaching. The thing is, if they can't get you in a trance you are going
to be too dangerous to handle.
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Friday, December 16, 2016
Turtle Island
No that is not about the Galapagos Islands and those big tortoises. Its the Native American
name for the North American Continent. Ever take a look at this thing on a map its shape?
Its like a turtle. you can figure the head north and tail is Mexico or vice versa, but its
a turtle.
How did they know this? An old name from thousands of years ago or more recently
people who could get high enough in the sky to see what its looks like, or information
from those who came from elsewhere (but are really humans originally from earth)?
There is another issue. Anyone remember that old view of the earth as sitting on
a giant turtle, and an earthquake is when it moves?
In any legend, you want to back engineer it, how might this refer to something that
was first reported by a wild eyed ignorant peasant and passed through a few
more people before the story stabilized with serious changes and misinterpretations?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Turtle
Guess where this designator comes from: China and India. Well, their lands are
sort of the other side of the world from us. That means from their perspective, the
world (with themselves as rivals to be the center of it) is on top of a turtle that is
on the underside.
And pass this through a lot of story tellers and so forth and you get the world
turtle.
Did the Native Americans get the story from the Chinese explorers? Maybe. Where
did they get it from? HOW DID THEY OR ANYONE KNOW?
unless there were some people who could fly a small segment a secret society
or a lost high tech civilization.
Ancient Astronauts and other nonsense (incl. awestruck near worshipful view of
"the ancients" and "antiquity") plays on odd indicators to argue that aliens
(WITHOUT an ultimate earth origin) were here teaching us everything. This of
course implies humans can't do anything but once in a while pick our noses
without breaking our arms in the process.
I think the aliens taught us some flight and electronic levitation and we taught
them megalithic building which their technology made possible to be much
bigger than we started with in the Neolithic. (despite my use of standard
geological anthropolical terms, I am not an ancient earth evolutionist.)
name for the North American Continent. Ever take a look at this thing on a map its shape?
Its like a turtle. you can figure the head north and tail is Mexico or vice versa, but its
a turtle.
How did they know this? An old name from thousands of years ago or more recently
people who could get high enough in the sky to see what its looks like, or information
from those who came from elsewhere (but are really humans originally from earth)?
There is another issue. Anyone remember that old view of the earth as sitting on
a giant turtle, and an earthquake is when it moves?
In any legend, you want to back engineer it, how might this refer to something that
was first reported by a wild eyed ignorant peasant and passed through a few
more people before the story stabilized with serious changes and misinterpretations?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Turtle
Guess where this designator comes from: China and India. Well, their lands are
sort of the other side of the world from us. That means from their perspective, the
world (with themselves as rivals to be the center of it) is on top of a turtle that is
on the underside.
And pass this through a lot of story tellers and so forth and you get the world
turtle.
Did the Native Americans get the story from the Chinese explorers? Maybe. Where
did they get it from? HOW DID THEY OR ANYONE KNOW?
unless there were some people who could fly a small segment a secret society
or a lost high tech civilization.
Ancient Astronauts and other nonsense (incl. awestruck near worshipful view of
"the ancients" and "antiquity") plays on odd indicators to argue that aliens
(WITHOUT an ultimate earth origin) were here teaching us everything. This of
course implies humans can't do anything but once in a while pick our noses
without breaking our arms in the process.
I think the aliens taught us some flight and electronic levitation and we taught
them megalithic building which their technology made possible to be much
bigger than we started with in the Neolithic. (despite my use of standard
geological anthropolical terms, I am not an ancient earth evolutionist.)
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Causes of the American Civil War
I am noticing an uptick of the drumbeat of claim that slavery was not
the cause of the Civil War. It is true that it was not the only cause.
But the declarations of secession by the states that then went on to
form the Confederacy make it clear that slavery was the primary
reason. http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/primarysources/declarationofcauses.html#
Each state's statement is linked on the top of the page, and you can
read them for yourself. YES OTHER CAUSES EXISTED. but with
one exception slavery was given a lot of attention.
John C. Calhoun was the first to formulate a theory of secession, as
distinct from general remarks and so forth. Ironically, this was to slow
up the process that might start, because at the time he had property in
the south and a career in the government in the north, and didn't want
any conflicts that could affect him. Therefore he argued (in response
to the tariff issue that was a major tipping point for some) that when
the fed issues an order the states don't like, they should first simply
ignore it (on whatever basis he gave, I forget what) and go through
a process of development of opposition and rejection, with formal
secession an option to use at the very end of this. (Which of course
meant he would be retired and his careers north and south not
interfered with and he comfortably home in the south if this
happened. Disgusting hypocrite. not that such an effort is evil in
itself, but he was of course arguing as a southern loyalist so to
speak and from a Constitutionalist position (which didn't really
allow for any of his procedures).
Someone argued that the Emancipation Declaration didn't free
any slaves, since it addressed places not under northern control yet,
and any non seceded slave states were not addressed by it. But
the minute a southern location came under northern control, the
Emancipation Declaration applied, and knowing about this would
give slaves in unrecovered places motive to either run away,
revolt or drag their heels in compliance in the war effort, and to
help the Union troops when they came. Many did run off to join
them.
The argument is given that the Constitution provides for secession.
Obviously people who say this haven't read the Constitution except
to skim lightly, or rely on the words of liars. The Constitution does
not provide for secession from the USA, only for secession from a
state, to become a new state of the USA, provided the state seceded
from allows this.
The Preamble speaks of "a more perfect union." as compared to
what? The Articles of Confederation that preceded it were like what
the Confederacy had, and a book was written showing how this
disunity itself interfered with effectiveness of the south during the
Civil War. Pride, romanticism, all these stirring, thrilling lies that
stir feelings that some think are "spiritual" but St. Paul calls puffed
up and empty, kept people from learning from this failure. Also
kept them from noticing that both sides prayed to the same God,
and the North won.
A more perfect union, by definition then, would be something
that was centralized, obliged all members to help each other
on demand either directly or through a central government, and
that you could not leave, and could not under most circumstances
disobey the central government.
Someone noted that the behavior of the signatories to the Constitution,
their caution and their demand for a Bill of Rights, showed that they
knew they were getting into something they couldn't get out of. Like
a marriage in the days when divorce was unthinkable.
When you examine what the Constitution gave the states, shows
exactly this. All meaningful manifestations of sovereignty were
stripped from the states. Most importantly, border controls and
tariffs and the right to deal with foreign governments except through
the federal government. Ego sops like having their own flags were
left, which is nothing.
The states were also required to guarantee a republican form of
government to their citizens. This meant that their constitutions had
to be approved by the federal government before they could be
admitted, and they could not write up one that or change later to
one that was monarchic, inherited political class (officially at
least), mobocratic democratic which by definition is without
representation, or other deviancies from the pattern of the federal
Constitution.
The Constitution declared that itself and any treaties made pursuant
to it were the supreme law of the land any decisions or laws of any
states to the contrary notwithstanding, which latter means, do not
withstand, i.e., have no standing, no merit, no authority.
What most so called "constitutionalists" tell you is a mix of truth
and lies.
The Tenth Amendment is a laugh. it reserves to "the people" whatever
the Constitution doesn't already secure to the federal government or to
the states. I can't think of anything that isn't already in one or the other
category.
As for the income tax, that is not unconstitutional because it is created
by a formal amendment to the Constitution. Some things about it may
be unconstitutional, but the phenomenon itself is not.
A really odd thing is not only the liar who said that wages are not
taxable income (sending a lot of people to jail who believed him)
but the people who bought his argument, because he repeatedly cited
to prove this a paragraph WHICH EXPLICITLY LISTS WAGES AS
TAXABLE INCOME in the tax code.
the cause of the Civil War. It is true that it was not the only cause.
But the declarations of secession by the states that then went on to
form the Confederacy make it clear that slavery was the primary
reason. http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/primarysources/declarationofcauses.html#
Each state's statement is linked on the top of the page, and you can
read them for yourself. YES OTHER CAUSES EXISTED. but with
one exception slavery was given a lot of attention.
John C. Calhoun was the first to formulate a theory of secession, as
distinct from general remarks and so forth. Ironically, this was to slow
up the process that might start, because at the time he had property in
the south and a career in the government in the north, and didn't want
any conflicts that could affect him. Therefore he argued (in response
to the tariff issue that was a major tipping point for some) that when
the fed issues an order the states don't like, they should first simply
ignore it (on whatever basis he gave, I forget what) and go through
a process of development of opposition and rejection, with formal
secession an option to use at the very end of this. (Which of course
meant he would be retired and his careers north and south not
interfered with and he comfortably home in the south if this
happened. Disgusting hypocrite. not that such an effort is evil in
itself, but he was of course arguing as a southern loyalist so to
speak and from a Constitutionalist position (which didn't really
allow for any of his procedures).
Someone argued that the Emancipation Declaration didn't free
any slaves, since it addressed places not under northern control yet,
and any non seceded slave states were not addressed by it. But
the minute a southern location came under northern control, the
Emancipation Declaration applied, and knowing about this would
give slaves in unrecovered places motive to either run away,
revolt or drag their heels in compliance in the war effort, and to
help the Union troops when they came. Many did run off to join
them.
The argument is given that the Constitution provides for secession.
Obviously people who say this haven't read the Constitution except
to skim lightly, or rely on the words of liars. The Constitution does
not provide for secession from the USA, only for secession from a
state, to become a new state of the USA, provided the state seceded
from allows this.
The Preamble speaks of "a more perfect union." as compared to
what? The Articles of Confederation that preceded it were like what
the Confederacy had, and a book was written showing how this
disunity itself interfered with effectiveness of the south during the
Civil War. Pride, romanticism, all these stirring, thrilling lies that
stir feelings that some think are "spiritual" but St. Paul calls puffed
up and empty, kept people from learning from this failure. Also
kept them from noticing that both sides prayed to the same God,
and the North won.
A more perfect union, by definition then, would be something
that was centralized, obliged all members to help each other
on demand either directly or through a central government, and
that you could not leave, and could not under most circumstances
disobey the central government.
Someone noted that the behavior of the signatories to the Constitution,
their caution and their demand for a Bill of Rights, showed that they
knew they were getting into something they couldn't get out of. Like
a marriage in the days when divorce was unthinkable.
When you examine what the Constitution gave the states, shows
exactly this. All meaningful manifestations of sovereignty were
stripped from the states. Most importantly, border controls and
tariffs and the right to deal with foreign governments except through
the federal government. Ego sops like having their own flags were
left, which is nothing.
The states were also required to guarantee a republican form of
government to their citizens. This meant that their constitutions had
to be approved by the federal government before they could be
admitted, and they could not write up one that or change later to
one that was monarchic, inherited political class (officially at
least), mobocratic democratic which by definition is without
representation, or other deviancies from the pattern of the federal
Constitution.
The Constitution declared that itself and any treaties made pursuant
to it were the supreme law of the land any decisions or laws of any
states to the contrary notwithstanding, which latter means, do not
withstand, i.e., have no standing, no merit, no authority.
What most so called "constitutionalists" tell you is a mix of truth
and lies.
The Tenth Amendment is a laugh. it reserves to "the people" whatever
the Constitution doesn't already secure to the federal government or to
the states. I can't think of anything that isn't already in one or the other
category.
As for the income tax, that is not unconstitutional because it is created
by a formal amendment to the Constitution. Some things about it may
be unconstitutional, but the phenomenon itself is not.
A really odd thing is not only the liar who said that wages are not
taxable income (sending a lot of people to jail who believed him)
but the people who bought his argument, because he repeatedly cited
to prove this a paragraph WHICH EXPLICITLY LISTS WAGES AS
TAXABLE INCOME in the tax code.
Friday, November 4, 2016
Bill and Hillary are closet devil worshippers and the same demons deceive the white light wiccans who don't understand what they are worshipping
back when Bill Clinton was first running for office (and he went to Haiti for a voodoo ritual to help him http://www.infowars.com has links to articles about all this, the same message was received by
charismatic Christian and a wiccan. The former was told that Jesus was backing Clinton, and the
latter that "the goddess" was backing Clinton.
This, especially with the voodoo angle, shows two things. the power behind ALL the occult,
whether white light right hand love peace bliss whatever, or left hand path, is the same. the
former distance themselves for the down and dirty blood and guts kind, and "negativity" incl.
the "negativity" of rejecting invasion of your self, saying NO but while this may be because
they personally dislike this, so can only be used by the demons to encourage people to
undermine their sense of separate identity and blur the edges of their psychological and
paraphysical boundaries, the same "forces" were projecting the same message, geared to the
preferences of the recipients.
AND THAT SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH THE CHARISMATIC SCENE,
whether regular or hyper charismatic New Apostolic Reformation type. (there are no apostles,
anyone claiming that title is a fraud that office was not transferred, only some of the authority
to teach and ordain and guard the truth from the Apostles in the office of bishop.)
The kind of passivity, letting go, shutting off the mind, not using your mind it is "soulish" or
"fleshly" etc. etc. is precisely what the demons need (and The real Holy Spirit does NOT need)
to work using you or possess you. (one charismatic gal admitted to me on the phone that it
was a kind of possession.) THERE IS NO BIBLICAL BASIS FOR SUCH PASSIVITY OF
WILL AND MIND.
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
Faith and Politics
http://www.wsj.com/articles/meet-planned-parenthoods-tim-kaine-1475537188
describes Tim Kaine as "a Catholic who campaigns on the proposition that his faith
is so personal it will never influence his political positions." I stopped at that point.
how often have I run into the idea that one's faith is "personal" so not to affect
anything else? I recall reading that an actress who had become Christian said
she didn't talk about it because it was too "personal." SAY WHAT?! we are told
to share the faith. Now, maybe this was just an excuse to avoid a debate when
she knew her faith was shaky and she wanted time to become stronger and have
the answers to arguments. But taking her at her word it is real weird.
there is the idea that one should keep one's religious views in one pocket and
the rest of life in another. Someone who was talking with me about his small
time business expressed some view or intent regarding some dispute that I
reminded him wasn't Christian and he answered "this is business."
there is a saying, "if Jesus Christ isn't Lord of all then He isn't Lord at all."
This is not correct, because He IS Lord whether He is acknowledged by you
as Lord at all or not. That matter will be settled when He comes back someday.
And it is also incorrect, because usually there is some growth in Christ, He is
your Lord but you haven't entirely submitted to Him in all things, and you
haven't sorted it out yet but you are on the right track. or backsliding and
hopefully will repent and get right with Christ.
But essentially what is being said is, if you keep your faith in one pocket
and the rest of life or some segment of it in another, then you are not
treating Jesus truly as Lord.
The context I think where this started was not only morals but politics, and
a clever tapestry of threads were woven resulting in the false picture of
God is a Republican. And presidents who didn't give a damn and who
selected Supreme Court nominees who were more addicted to the legal
structure than to going back to a common sense view so insured Roe v.
Wade was safe, got elected on the anti abortion platform we all forgetting
that these otherwise monsters were not kings who could rule by decree
and overturn the evil at issue, and got conned by them.
But the issue is, like the saying What Would Jesus Do? that you should
take the faith into account in your daily and even political decisions.
Many things are shaky and unclear, some things help good in one context
and oppose it in another. Voting against abortion is always good, but
if you have an anti abortion candidate who will cut back subsidies and
welfare etc., and a pro abortion candidate who keep such or increase
such to pregnant women and post birth mothers, even when they have
a man in tow, then vote the second. Why? because the policies of the
former will give a motive for the murder the woman can't afford the
new child and keep the one cared for well who is already born, and
so forth. maybe it is just something selfish. but the motive to kill is
there if the income is cut.
and conversely, a woman contemplating abortion for economic reasons
might not do so if help or increased help is available.
Now, it is rare when a political decision has any bearing on theology.
Will this election's (local or federal or state) outcome affect the ease
of making converts to the Gospel or not? aside from that, most would
figure eh, whatever.
But "the faith" can include moral issues. And these are mislabeled
"politics" because subject to laws that are contested in the political
arena now. Well, guess what.
laws against murder and theft and even wife beating are strictly
political because they are the product of action in legislatures by
elected people, and they are the most glaring examples of forcing
your morality on others that you could ask for.
So this treating of abortion as a "political issue" or "forcing your
morality on someone" is to put it mildly inappropriate. Ditto
the gay etc. agenda. (LGBTQ is too much trouble and too weird
looking to type out, have to think twice to do it right, and sounds
like accepting them by using their lingo someone once said.)
call it the pervert agenda, that would safely and adequately refer
to anything.
And no, sex isn't just for reproduction only to be proper. And that
isn't an act of love inherently. Sex is a mode of reproduction, and
that reproduction should happen in a context that is not going to
traumatize the kid. A good relationship between the couple. Only
once in the OT does God say He wants reproduction and made
sex for that, and the context is denouncing those who betrayed
their wives and divorced them to take pagan wives, resulting in
not having a "godly seed" God said He wanted. In Genesis
the man shall LEAVE his parents (you are not supposed to be
marrying the whole family and it is not supposed to be arranged
for political or financial benefit of others) CLEAVE TO his
woman (ish translated wife which also in Old English means
woman, his old lady, his steady girl) and THEY SHALL BECOME
ONE FLESH the sex act develops as the ultimate self sharing
of your body with another, not a stage to marriage as the next
level but it IS the next level. Indeed, marriages aren't considered
final without "consummation." I Cor. 6:16 specifies on the
basis of this that the sex act is what makes the two one flesh,
even if with a prostitute, which is why a man who fornicates
sins against his own flesh.
So the contraception thing is an error in Roman Catholicism.
But the anti abortion thing is not an error. And the only reason
it is now "political" instead of common sense moral and illegal,
is because of faux scientific terminology being hijacked and
some snivel about the poor victims of botched abortions and
eugenics and other issues and enough in legislatures being
persuaded (or blackmailed by those who know the prostitutes,
gay and straight, and abortionists these two faced legislators
have used) to make it legal.
So if your faith is so personal it doesn't affect your behavior,
in business or politics or sex or whatever, then that faith is
mere make believe, it isn't real, its dead.
Read St. James Epistle.
And notice that Paul is constantly harping on the proper
vs. improper behavior and states of mind that logically
result from pistis, belief that affects action.
describes Tim Kaine as "a Catholic who campaigns on the proposition that his faith
is so personal it will never influence his political positions." I stopped at that point.
how often have I run into the idea that one's faith is "personal" so not to affect
anything else? I recall reading that an actress who had become Christian said
she didn't talk about it because it was too "personal." SAY WHAT?! we are told
to share the faith. Now, maybe this was just an excuse to avoid a debate when
she knew her faith was shaky and she wanted time to become stronger and have
the answers to arguments. But taking her at her word it is real weird.
there is the idea that one should keep one's religious views in one pocket and
the rest of life in another. Someone who was talking with me about his small
time business expressed some view or intent regarding some dispute that I
reminded him wasn't Christian and he answered "this is business."
there is a saying, "if Jesus Christ isn't Lord of all then He isn't Lord at all."
This is not correct, because He IS Lord whether He is acknowledged by you
as Lord at all or not. That matter will be settled when He comes back someday.
And it is also incorrect, because usually there is some growth in Christ, He is
your Lord but you haven't entirely submitted to Him in all things, and you
haven't sorted it out yet but you are on the right track. or backsliding and
hopefully will repent and get right with Christ.
But essentially what is being said is, if you keep your faith in one pocket
and the rest of life or some segment of it in another, then you are not
treating Jesus truly as Lord.
The context I think where this started was not only morals but politics, and
a clever tapestry of threads were woven resulting in the false picture of
God is a Republican. And presidents who didn't give a damn and who
selected Supreme Court nominees who were more addicted to the legal
structure than to going back to a common sense view so insured Roe v.
Wade was safe, got elected on the anti abortion platform we all forgetting
that these otherwise monsters were not kings who could rule by decree
and overturn the evil at issue, and got conned by them.
But the issue is, like the saying What Would Jesus Do? that you should
take the faith into account in your daily and even political decisions.
Many things are shaky and unclear, some things help good in one context
and oppose it in another. Voting against abortion is always good, but
if you have an anti abortion candidate who will cut back subsidies and
welfare etc., and a pro abortion candidate who keep such or increase
such to pregnant women and post birth mothers, even when they have
a man in tow, then vote the second. Why? because the policies of the
former will give a motive for the murder the woman can't afford the
new child and keep the one cared for well who is already born, and
so forth. maybe it is just something selfish. but the motive to kill is
there if the income is cut.
and conversely, a woman contemplating abortion for economic reasons
might not do so if help or increased help is available.
Now, it is rare when a political decision has any bearing on theology.
Will this election's (local or federal or state) outcome affect the ease
of making converts to the Gospel or not? aside from that, most would
figure eh, whatever.
But "the faith" can include moral issues. And these are mislabeled
"politics" because subject to laws that are contested in the political
arena now. Well, guess what.
laws against murder and theft and even wife beating are strictly
political because they are the product of action in legislatures by
elected people, and they are the most glaring examples of forcing
your morality on others that you could ask for.
So this treating of abortion as a "political issue" or "forcing your
morality on someone" is to put it mildly inappropriate. Ditto
the gay etc. agenda. (LGBTQ is too much trouble and too weird
looking to type out, have to think twice to do it right, and sounds
like accepting them by using their lingo someone once said.)
call it the pervert agenda, that would safely and adequately refer
to anything.
And no, sex isn't just for reproduction only to be proper. And that
isn't an act of love inherently. Sex is a mode of reproduction, and
that reproduction should happen in a context that is not going to
traumatize the kid. A good relationship between the couple. Only
once in the OT does God say He wants reproduction and made
sex for that, and the context is denouncing those who betrayed
their wives and divorced them to take pagan wives, resulting in
not having a "godly seed" God said He wanted. In Genesis
the man shall LEAVE his parents (you are not supposed to be
marrying the whole family and it is not supposed to be arranged
for political or financial benefit of others) CLEAVE TO his
woman (ish translated wife which also in Old English means
woman, his old lady, his steady girl) and THEY SHALL BECOME
ONE FLESH the sex act develops as the ultimate self sharing
of your body with another, not a stage to marriage as the next
level but it IS the next level. Indeed, marriages aren't considered
final without "consummation." I Cor. 6:16 specifies on the
basis of this that the sex act is what makes the two one flesh,
even if with a prostitute, which is why a man who fornicates
sins against his own flesh.
So the contraception thing is an error in Roman Catholicism.
But the anti abortion thing is not an error. And the only reason
it is now "political" instead of common sense moral and illegal,
is because of faux scientific terminology being hijacked and
some snivel about the poor victims of botched abortions and
eugenics and other issues and enough in legislatures being
persuaded (or blackmailed by those who know the prostitutes,
gay and straight, and abortionists these two faced legislators
have used) to make it legal.
So if your faith is so personal it doesn't affect your behavior,
in business or politics or sex or whatever, then that faith is
mere make believe, it isn't real, its dead.
Read St. James Epistle.
And notice that Paul is constantly harping on the proper
vs. improper behavior and states of mind that logically
result from pistis, belief that affects action.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Organ Donors are Alive when their Organs are Harvested
The illusion of Science
Organ Donors are Alive when their Organs are Harvested
Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate p...eriod of time.
The current terminology "Brain Death" was unheard of.
When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a "Pandora’s Box" was opened.
Prior to 1968 a person was declared dead only after their breathing and heart stopped for a determinate p...eriod of time.
The current terminology "Brain Death" was unheard of.
When surgeons realized they had the capability of taking organs from one seemingly “close to death” person and implanting them into another person to keep the recipient alive longer, a "Pandora’s Box" was opened.
In the beginning, through trial and error, they discovered it was not possible to perform this "miraculous" #surgery with organs taken from someone truly dead, even if the donor was without circulation for merely a few minutes, because organ damage occurs within a very brief time after circulation stops.
To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term "#BrainDeath" was contrived.
Much is being done to get your organs.
For an organ to be suitable for #transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.
Once DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the #government often now makes the determination on our behalf) the "organ donor" undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to protect and preserve the body-container of "spare parts!"
The "organ donor" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising.
Literally the "donor" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on neurologically intact donors who do not fulfill neurologic or brain death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in #hospitals across the USA.
The truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE "DONOR"
Organ removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralyzing agent but no anesthetic!
Multi-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is stopped, a moment before removal.
It is well documented the heart rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the very response the anesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery when the anesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors are not anesthetized.
There are growing numbers of protesters among #nurses and #anesthesiologists, who react strongly to the movements of the supposed "corpse." These movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves from this program altogether.
New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive #lawsuit is claiming.
The suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive.
Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five #patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.
'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice.
He said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants.
'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.'
The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.
Network officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied Nassau University Medical Center staff into declaring the teen dead, stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'
But McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.
The lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.
The suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.
It claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs harvested.
In November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was being given 'a paralyzing anesthetic' because her body was still jerking.
'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline.
'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'
He said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless.
'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around.
And a paralyzer only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.
McMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.
'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real ones had been.'
According to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising frivolous issues and questions.'
McMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.
'If counselors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.
The veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November - said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.
Estimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000
More than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the #medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.
This approach, they say, would avoid the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain during the harvesting process.
The chilling comments were offered by #Doctor Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.
“Because there is a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write.
“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their autonomy is respected.”
Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm” (i.e given anesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any criterion to declare death.”
The doctors note that developing the criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy” aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be “empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that the patient is dead in order to get his organs.
Based on an interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the concept of "brain death" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs.
These people (who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANESTHESIA!!!
Medical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for last, after which point they are, of course, dead.
It's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke.
If you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION! Evil is still evil by any other name.
A special thanks to Sandra Tsai for making us aware of pending lawsuits & information.
More News on: http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597
http://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx
http://www.cdc.gov/transplantsaf…/outbreak-invest/index.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679
http://www.everydayhealth.com/…/donating-kidney-may-carry-…/
http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx
To justify their experimental procedures it was necessary for them to come up with a solution which is how the term "#BrainDeath" was contrived.
Much is being done to get your organs.
For an organ to be suitable for #transplantation it must be healthy and it must come from a living person.
Once DBD (Donation After Brain Death) or DCD (Donation After Cardiac Death) has been verified and permission extracted from distraught family members (in cases where relatives cannot be located the #government often now makes the determination on our behalf) the "organ donor" undergoes hours, sometimes days, of torturous treatment utilized to protect and preserve the body-container of "spare parts!"
The "organ donor" is forced to endure the excruciating painful and ongoing chemical treatment in preparation for organ excising.
Literally the "donor" is now an organ warehouse and used for the sole purpose of organ preservation until a compatible recipient can be located.
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can be performed on neurologically intact donors who do not fulfill neurologic or brain death criteria before circulatory arrest. This commentary focuses on the most controversial donor-related issues anticipated from mandatory implementation of DCD for imminent or cardiac death in #hospitals across the USA.
The truth of the horrific treatment and DEATH OF THE "DONOR"
Organ removal is performed while the patient is given only a paralyzing agent but no anesthetic!
Multi-organ excision, on the average, takes three to four hours of operating during which time the heart is beating, the blood pressure is normal and respiration is occurring albeit the patient is on a ventilator. Each organ is cut out until finally the beating heart is stopped, a moment before removal.
It is well documented the heart rate and blood pressure go up when the incision is made. This is the very response the anesthesiologist often observes in everyday surgery when the anesthetic is insufficient. But, as stated below, organ donors are not anesthetized.
There are growing numbers of protesters among #nurses and #anesthesiologists, who react strongly to the movements of the supposed "corpse." These movements are sometimes so violent it makes it impossible to continue the taking of organs. Resulting from their personal experiences and attestations, many in the medical profession have removed themselves from this program altogether.
New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive #lawsuit is claiming.
The suit accuses transplant non-profit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive.
Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, reckons one in five #patients are showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts.
'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice.
He said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants.
'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin grafts, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money.'
The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space.
The lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court in 2012, cites a 19-year-old car crash victim who was still struggling to breathe and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light for his organs to be harvested.
Network officials including director Michael Goldstein allegedly bullied Nassau University Medical Center staff into declaring the teen dead, stating during a conference call: 'This kid is dead, you got that?'
But McMahon said he believed the 19-year-old could have recovered.
The lawsuit cites three other examples of patients who were still clinging to life when doctors gave a 'note' - an official declaration by a hospital that a patient is brain dead, which, as well as consent from next of kin, is required before a transplant can take place.
The suit claims that a man was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn, a month later, again showing brain activity.
It claims McMahon protested but was blown off by hospital and donor network staff, and the man was declared brain dead and his organs harvested.
In November 2011, a woman admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and her organs were about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was being given 'a paralyzing anesthetic' because her body was still jerking.
'She was having brain function when they were cutting into her on the table,' McMahon told MailOnline.
'He had given her a paralyser and there's no reason to give someone who is dead a paralyser.'
He said he confronted the person who gave it to her and he was speechless.
'Finally he said he was told to do it because while they were cutting her chest open she was moving her chest around.
And a paralyzer only paralyses you, it does nothing for the pain,' he said.
McMahon added that surgeons 'took everything' with regards to body parts.
'They took her eyes, her joints. She was right there when I was having the conversation. They were inserting the plastic bones where the real ones had been.'
According to the lawsuit, when McMahon probed further on the disturbing case another network employee told hospital staff he was 'an untrained troublemaker with a history of raising frivolous issues and questions.'
McMahon added that staff members who collect the most organs throughout the year qualify for a Christmas bonus.
'If counselors do well by getting a lot of organs they are given a bonus in December,' he said.
The veteran - who worked at the donor network between July and November - said there are about 30-40 staff who are out in the field, going to hospitals and trying to get signatures and donations.
Estimated U.S. Average Billed Charges Per Transplant: Heart $1,000,000 Double Lung: $800,000 Liver: $580,000 Kidney: $275,000
More than 123,000 people are on waiting lists for organ transplants in the United States, 100,000 of whom are waiting for new kidneys. Yet the need for healthy organs far outpaces donations. Only 28,000 transplants were completed in the last year, according to the 2014 national data from the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
Because organ donors are often alive when their organs are harvested, the #medical community should not require donors to be declared dead, but instead adopt more “honest” moral criteria that allow the harvesting of organs from “dying” or “severely injured” patients, with proper consent, three leading experts have argued.
This approach, they say, would avoid the “pseudo-objective” claim that a donor is “really dead,” which is often based upon purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the organ donor pool, and would allow organ harvesters to be more honest with the public, as well as ensure that donors don’t feel pain during the harvesting process.
The chilling comments were offered by #Doctor Neil Lazar, director of the medical-surgical intensive care unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto, and David Rodriguez-Arias of Universidad del Pais Vasco in Spain, at a U.S. bioethics conference in October and published in a recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics.
“Because there is a general assumption that dead individuals cannot be harmed, veneration of the dead-donor rule is dangerously misleading,” they write.
“Ultimately, what is important for the protection and respect of potential donors is not to have a death certificate signed, but rather to be certain they are beyond suffering and to guarantee that their autonomy is respected.”
Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (DDR), the authors propose that donors should be “protected from harm” (i.e given anesthesia so that they cannot feel pain during the donation process), that informed consent should be obtained, and that society should be “fully informed of the inherently debatable nature of any criterion to declare death.”
The doctors note that developing the criteria for so-called “brain death,” which is often used by doctors to declare death before organ donation, was an “ideological strategy” aimed at increasing the donor pool that has been found to be “empirically and theoretically flawed.” They also criticize the latest attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as circulatory death, which they argue amount to simply “pretending” that the patient is dead in order to get his organs.
Based on an interview in 2013 with Dr. Paul Byrne, 80-year-old neonatologist blowing the whistle on the dark side of hospitals, it became clear that the concept of "brain death" is a complete fabrication conjured up for the sole purpose of legitimizing the murder of living people in order to harvest their organs.
These people (who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents or drug overdoses or the like) are given paralysis drugs during organ removal -- BUT NO ANESTHESIA!!!
Medical staff are literally cleaving open the chests of these innocent people and tearing out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart for last, after which point they are, of course, dead.
It's wakey wakey time people.This is no joke.
If you do not want to be tortured to death by medical sadists, SAY NO TO ORGAN DONATION! Evil is still evil by any other name.
A special thanks to Sandra Tsai for making us aware of pending lawsuits & information.
More News on: http://www.theillusionofscience.org/418692745
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17020597
http://www.srtr.org/annual_Reports/2011/113a_dh.aspx
http://www.cdc.gov/transplantsaf…/outbreak-invest/index.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990679
http://www.everydayhealth.com/…/donating-kidney-may-carry-…/
http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/Default.aspx
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
God's wrath and God's love
Something I emailed someone.
The Fathers are not alien to the idea of God's anger at sin, both the renovationsts and the
more classical agree that God's anger is not the passion driven unstable etc. stuff we are used to. However anthropomorphic you want to deride it as, and God's love also, don't forget that,
it is solidly present in the Bible and that includes the Psalms we use.
OFten human anger is based in part on liking being angry or on varioius issues that don't have
to do with love. There is plenty of reason for God to have some anger at the intransigently
hostile to Him type humans. There is nothing evil about that.
God's love must be eliminated then with God's anger for both are anthropomorphisms. This
very term anthropomorphism reeks of the more educated type of paganism that rebelled
against the lowlife passionate "gods" of Greece and Rome, and their Renaissance humanist
heirs who laid the groundwork for later bad developments in theology east and west.
so you want to go that far?
when you love something you are angry at what tries to harm it. God is wrongly styled as
wrathful in the OT loving in the NT but while He shows His wrath at times, He spent a lot
space in the prophets begging people to repent and offering forgiveness. The NT fulfills
prophecies in the OT.
Granted His emotions for lack of a better word are not identical to human emotions but
at the same time, we being made in His image and likeness can't reject anthropomorphisms
outright for the very reason that we ARE made in His image and likeness however warped
that has become.
Its not a question of a God eagerly looking to torment people. indeed, Jesus says Sodom
will have it better in the Judgement because they WOULD have repented if given the signs
and wonders Christ did in some other cities who did not repent, and those will have it worse.
a God Who cuts you slack because of the good you would have done if given the chance the repentance you would have done if given the chance, is not a sadist. that doesn't mean they
will have blessedness, just not such bad punishment. the warning that the hypocrites who
devour the money of widows and orphans and for pretense make long prayers will have the
greater damnation shows there is a lesser damnation.
Friday, September 30, 2016
Monday, September 12, 2016
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Tuesday, August 9, 2016
Saturday, July 30, 2016
Sunday, July 24, 2016
the problems of pokemon go
there are two problems with this game. the obvious dangers created by it described here and elsewhere. [this was part of a thread on Nextdoor, where the hazards of people getting in the way
misparking cars, not paying attention etc. were discussed. there is also the risk of being robbed
or worse because of going somewhere dangerous and not paying attention.]
and pokemon itself. it means "pocket monster" like you'd want to keep a pet
monster in your pocket, a familiar spirit perhaps? the characters are all paranormal type things, and my guess is that if someone researched Japanese demons including the more obscure ones and sorcery and its terms, some or all of the characters' names would be among them.
children's books, movies, games etc. and video games for teens and adults involve a lot of occultic stuff. "summoning" figures in one otherwise worthwhile strategy war game. So I won't play it. Decades ago I messed around with sorcery and it contributed to breakdowns. these things are real. ghosthunters with electronic equipment show that. some may be the dead but others are not. the universal experience and reports of all peoples of all ages of the world that they exist should not be despised as mere superstition. In my case,
I tried two or three times to conjure up demons with a protective circle and names of God in it and nothing appeared. always "licensed them to depart" just in case. then I was preparing the implements of the ritual to try again, and the air changed and I could mentally almost physically see a dirty dark bluish portal or pit like something whirling opening up and could see myself as a white ghost clawing at the walls and going down. I knew I was in trouble. I prayed to God meaning the God of Abraham I had read about in the Bible as
a child, not the hindu new age whatnot philosophic brahmanic blur. The air cleared and just in case I "licensed them to depart" then did an exorcism of the house in The Name of The Father and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit and burned all the implements and never did this again. I didn't know much about exorcism but I had an idea of what to do. It took me a few more years to commit to Jesus Christ and decades later I joined the Orthodox Church.
Most people won't run into this by playing pokemon. but it sets a tone. Some few will go farther, especially if they attract something that can only mildly influence them.
Disney is not and never has been "wholesome" and the hidden images in the art in the movies got a bit worse over time. Fantasia is all about a mishandled demon evocation. Tinker Bell and her fairy dust is about the glamour, the mind deceiving power of the fae. who are not good in original stories. Glittery and/or particulate especially mind blurring white cloud or gold with reddish tones kind of light whether visible or only a mental impression is demonic. It took me years to figure that out and got confirmation from someone writing about what monks had experienced. The heavy dark atmosphere is obvious the other more infestive and dangerous because deceptive.
Disney was personally mean and pro fascist.
there are now heavy duty type occult books turning up in the Rocklin Library.
its a conveyorbelt from just pretend and just games and its nothing real just a game to hardcore satanism at the other end of the spectrum. or, someone doesn't want to go that far, messing with demons. The values promoted are harmful even if the occult isn't obvious. Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty are female models that promote passivity and all their problems are solved by a rich man. Lady and the Tramp sets you up to like bad boys who are looking for a rich gal or at least one with her own home more stable than the ones he loves and leaves, and if Lady wasn't classy and housed it would have been the same with her.
beyond that, violence and adventurism and glorifying conquest and then there is Mary Poppins as a pop thing and Peter Pan (last name is odd, the sex obsessed half goat satyr demon of rural Greece) Poppins is clearly a witch, and she cultivates a model of the ritual and non ritual abuse situation (even though no abuse occurs) where life is split between one world and another, so she takes the kids on adventures and if they speak of them she is indignant that they are making things up. screws with their minds, dishonest, builds a secret world. this unwholesome model fits incest and adultery and all kinds of criminality and the snitch code. it lays the foundations. at one point she is surrounded by the sun and moon and planets all small and the sun kisses her. At that point I knew even as a child of maybe 10 or 11 that she was a witch. it was argued she was a good witch. but really, how good is one who screws with kids heads, teaches them to disbelieve the evidence of their own eyes, and essentially gaslights them? there is no such thing as a good witch. the methods and source of energy and violation of God ordained boundaries are the same, whatever the goal.
the modern violence and criminality and occultism of dangerous sorts of teens and some adults now, may not seem to have any relevance to all this. But the groundwork for it among those not raised in criminal families is built in part by this kind of literature and movies, that each decade gets more and more extreme, as the jaded senses need more and more stimulation whether special effects or slasher stuff or pornography.
everyone doesn't got down the conveyorbelt. many don't maybe most don't, but they can't be unaffected entirely. but the development of violence in society is increased by a culture of violence and dishonesty and unchastity (just as bad in men as women according to the Bible St. Paul attacks male unchastity at least twice and it was an excommunication issue in the early centuries church canons) which is built on models presented in the media and in life. a lot of money goes into arguing there is no effect of media on life. if that were true, there would be no advertising industry, and no political propaganda and no concerns about racial and women's images in media.
misparking cars, not paying attention etc. were discussed. there is also the risk of being robbed
or worse because of going somewhere dangerous and not paying attention.]
and pokemon itself. it means "pocket monster" like you'd want to keep a pet
monster in your pocket, a familiar spirit perhaps? the characters are all paranormal type things, and my guess is that if someone researched Japanese demons including the more obscure ones and sorcery and its terms, some or all of the characters' names would be among them.
children's books, movies, games etc. and video games for teens and adults involve a lot of occultic stuff. "summoning" figures in one otherwise worthwhile strategy war game. So I won't play it. Decades ago I messed around with sorcery and it contributed to breakdowns. these things are real. ghosthunters with electronic equipment show that. some may be the dead but others are not. the universal experience and reports of all peoples of all ages of the world that they exist should not be despised as mere superstition. In my case,
I tried two or three times to conjure up demons with a protective circle and names of God in it and nothing appeared. always "licensed them to depart" just in case. then I was preparing the implements of the ritual to try again, and the air changed and I could mentally almost physically see a dirty dark bluish portal or pit like something whirling opening up and could see myself as a white ghost clawing at the walls and going down. I knew I was in trouble. I prayed to God meaning the God of Abraham I had read about in the Bible as
a child, not the hindu new age whatnot philosophic brahmanic blur. The air cleared and just in case I "licensed them to depart" then did an exorcism of the house in The Name of The Father and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit and burned all the implements and never did this again. I didn't know much about exorcism but I had an idea of what to do. It took me a few more years to commit to Jesus Christ and decades later I joined the Orthodox Church.
Most people won't run into this by playing pokemon. but it sets a tone. Some few will go farther, especially if they attract something that can only mildly influence them.
Disney is not and never has been "wholesome" and the hidden images in the art in the movies got a bit worse over time. Fantasia is all about a mishandled demon evocation. Tinker Bell and her fairy dust is about the glamour, the mind deceiving power of the fae. who are not good in original stories. Glittery and/or particulate especially mind blurring white cloud or gold with reddish tones kind of light whether visible or only a mental impression is demonic. It took me years to figure that out and got confirmation from someone writing about what monks had experienced. The heavy dark atmosphere is obvious the other more infestive and dangerous because deceptive.
Disney was personally mean and pro fascist.
there are now heavy duty type occult books turning up in the Rocklin Library.
its a conveyorbelt from just pretend and just games and its nothing real just a game to hardcore satanism at the other end of the spectrum. or, someone doesn't want to go that far, messing with demons. The values promoted are harmful even if the occult isn't obvious. Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty are female models that promote passivity and all their problems are solved by a rich man. Lady and the Tramp sets you up to like bad boys who are looking for a rich gal or at least one with her own home more stable than the ones he loves and leaves, and if Lady wasn't classy and housed it would have been the same with her.
beyond that, violence and adventurism and glorifying conquest and then there is Mary Poppins as a pop thing and Peter Pan (last name is odd, the sex obsessed half goat satyr demon of rural Greece) Poppins is clearly a witch, and she cultivates a model of the ritual and non ritual abuse situation (even though no abuse occurs) where life is split between one world and another, so she takes the kids on adventures and if they speak of them she is indignant that they are making things up. screws with their minds, dishonest, builds a secret world. this unwholesome model fits incest and adultery and all kinds of criminality and the snitch code. it lays the foundations. at one point she is surrounded by the sun and moon and planets all small and the sun kisses her. At that point I knew even as a child of maybe 10 or 11 that she was a witch. it was argued she was a good witch. but really, how good is one who screws with kids heads, teaches them to disbelieve the evidence of their own eyes, and essentially gaslights them? there is no such thing as a good witch. the methods and source of energy and violation of God ordained boundaries are the same, whatever the goal.
the modern violence and criminality and occultism of dangerous sorts of teens and some adults now, may not seem to have any relevance to all this. But the groundwork for it among those not raised in criminal families is built in part by this kind of literature and movies, that each decade gets more and more extreme, as the jaded senses need more and more stimulation whether special effects or slasher stuff or pornography.
everyone doesn't got down the conveyorbelt. many don't maybe most don't, but they can't be unaffected entirely. but the development of violence in society is increased by a culture of violence and dishonesty and unchastity (just as bad in men as women according to the Bible St. Paul attacks male unchastity at least twice and it was an excommunication issue in the early centuries church canons) which is built on models presented in the media and in life. a lot of money goes into arguing there is no effect of media on life. if that were true, there would be no advertising industry, and no political propaganda and no concerns about racial and women's images in media.
Friday, July 22, 2016
Is The Human Race a Resource?
some of the people cited in this are New Age but on the issue quoted are accurate enough.
trust no one. this narrator isn't entirely free from the new age deception himself, but cuts through a lot of it. ra and seth are deceivers, the higher helpful aliens beings are deceiers even the so called lght beings are just satan transforming himself into the likeness of an angel of light as Paul says.
the writer is right that chanelled information can't be trusted, but in fact no good thing would
channel because that involves boundary violation. God operates with the prophets conscious.
we are called to be sober minded not led about like pagans in a trance state.
slaughterhouse for human meat
this is labeled as moslems cutting up Christians for organs. That is not cutting
for organs. that is cutting for meat.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c1c_1395018660
for organs. that is cutting for meat.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c1c_1395018660
Thursday, July 21, 2016
Sunday, July 17, 2016
Friday, July 15, 2016
Thursday, July 14, 2016
three really good articles
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Black Lives Matter leader a Gorge Soros friend
Sunday, July 10, 2016
Christ at the Checkpoint
"At a recent conference called "Christ at the Checkpoint," for example, we noticed Christian dhimmis, ruled by the Palestinian Authority, acting aggressively against the sole democratic state in the region, Israel, where the Christian community is actually thriving. The Christians at "Christ at the Checkpoint" tried falsely to rewrite history. Like good dhimmis, they denied any relation of Jesus to Jewish roots -- even though the Last Supper was a Jewish Passover Seder -- and thereby even to our own to Christian roots, and the purpose of God's appearance as a human on Earth, through the Jewish people, as written in the Bible.
Moreover, the conference's organizers, like its participants, ignored any current or historic persecution of Christians by Muslims. In fact, by their announcements, they even denied their own beliefs as mentioned in the holy Bible. The only concern that led them at each step, every second and every moment, was fawningly to satisfy the Islamic Arab majority in its fight against Jewish state.
Coexistence is not the issue for Christians here, but rather fears for their own existence and total lack of freedom under the Palestinian Authority, as in all Arab states. The PA and other Arab Islamic regimes are smart enough to smell this weakness. They plan activities, pay salaries and fund anti-Israeli Christian dhimmi organizations, in order to make Western Christians believe in the "Palestinian cause" -- by which they mean the establishment of another Arab-Islamic dictatorship state with no human rights in it.
Their method is to use Christians temporarily, pitting them against their Jewish brothers, with whom the Christians share the same roots and the same holy books. The Palestinian Authority constitution, in Article 4, states clearly: "The principles of Islamic Shari'a shall be the main source of legislation."
If this country is defined as Islamic, it assures Islamic superiority upon all other religions and prevents any person from ever leaving Islam. It is important for the West to understand that all matters relating to human rights and freedom of religion mentioned are irrelevant, and are there just to attract temporary Western support. The Western democratic world -- with all Christian churches worldwide -- should be aware of this tactic. They should also acknowledge, for their own survival, that Israel has democratically enshrined, and abides by, human rights laws for Christians and all its other citizens. The West should stop funding Palestinian Arabs so easily, and put pressure on Palestinian leaders to assure that they provide human rights, security, equality and freedom for their own people, as well as for the local Christian community. Israel is not the problem; Israel is the solution." http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8055/arabs-christians-israel
Wednesday, July 6, 2016
Whence Technocracy: Neofeudalism, Peasants and Pitchforks
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/07/06/whence-technocracy-neofeudalism-peasants-pitchforks/
C.H. Smith nailed it: “There is no avenue left for advocacy, grievances or redress in a system dominated by global corporations.”
In the old feudal days, peasants with pitchforks and torches could assault the lord’s castle on a hill. Today, there is no castle nor even a hill. Yet, we still have the same grievances, angst and desires for peace, safety and prosperity.
Smith writes,
In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era. Three years later in 1973, Brzezinski teamed up with financier David Rockefeller to start the Trilateral Commission that was dedicated to “fostering a New International Economic Order.” Brzezinski explained,
So, what part of Brzezinski’s statement above is unclear?
Was Between Two Ages some sort of literary equivalent to Hitler’s Mien Kampf in which he laid out the elites’ plans in terms so clear that nobody would believe them?
Whatever the case, Brzezinski envisioned the “ultimate solution” in his carefully defined “Technetronic Era.”
What is the “Technetronic Era”? Plain and simple, it is a vision rooted in historic Technocracy from the 1930s. It is also the resurrection of feudalism with many new twists thanks to advanced technology. Thus, the term neofeudalism fits Technocracy or Technetronic perfectly: A few own all the resources and then tell everyone else what they can or can’t do on planet earth.
In 1938, The Technocrat magazine defined Technocracy as follows:
In other words, Technocracy is a complete takeover of both the means of production and consumption, a feat never before attempted nor achieved in the history of the world.
You might never have heard of Technocracy before, but can you feel the manacle of scientific dictatorship tightening around your neck?
In my opinion, this is why Britain recently voted to leave the European Union, which is openly called a Technocracy in the European press. This is also why Trumpism is accelerating in America.
Simply put, people don’t have to understand the cause in order to feel the pain.
Oh, would that there were a castle on a hill that we could assault and demand that our grievances be heard. However, because Technocracy and Technocrats are so thoroughly infused into society, institutions and corporate culture, it is impossible to hold their feet to the fire.
In the old feudal days, peasants with pitchforks and torches could assault the lord’s castle on a hill. Today, there is no castle nor even a hill. Yet, we still have the same grievances, angst and desires for peace, safety and prosperity.
Smith writes,
The reality is there is no avenue left for advocacy, grievances or redress in a system dominated by global corporations. The castle on the hill doesn’t exist; it is diffused all over the planet, and well protected by state minions controlled by neofeudal corporate interests.
Do you really think it’s mere coincidence that small business growth has imploded in the era of corporate dominance? As I explained yesterday in Governments Change, the Corporatocracy Endures, central banks dropping interest rates to near-zero for financiers and corporations sealed corporate dominance of finance and governance. There are few opportunities for small businesses when the financial and political structures serve neofeudal corporate interests.
Corporate power destroys democracy. That is the heart of neofeudalism.
Let me explain what happened here.In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era. Three years later in 1973, Brzezinski teamed up with financier David Rockefeller to start the Trilateral Commission that was dedicated to “fostering a New International Economic Order.” Brzezinski explained,
“The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” – Between Two Ages
Antony Sutton and I wrote (Trilaterals Over Washington, I and II) and lectured extensively on this in the late 1970s. It’s too bad that more people didn’t listen to us back then, but the establishment made sure that we were thoroughly marginalized and discredited. In fact, the nation’s largest book chain at the time, B. Dalton Booksellers, blatantly black-listed our books by sending out a memo to all their stores that stated, “Trilaterals Over Washington is out of print and the publisher is out of business.” Neither was true, but it killed our sales.So, what part of Brzezinski’s statement above is unclear?
Was Between Two Ages some sort of literary equivalent to Hitler’s Mien Kampf in which he laid out the elites’ plans in terms so clear that nobody would believe them?
Whatever the case, Brzezinski envisioned the “ultimate solution” in his carefully defined “Technetronic Era.”
What is the “Technetronic Era”? Plain and simple, it is a vision rooted in historic Technocracy from the 1930s. It is also the resurrection of feudalism with many new twists thanks to advanced technology. Thus, the term neofeudalism fits Technocracy or Technetronic perfectly: A few own all the resources and then tell everyone else what they can or can’t do on planet earth.
In 1938, The Technocrat magazine defined Technocracy as follows:
“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population… “
This is exactly what is happening today: social engineers working with global corporations to take over the entire economic and social landscape. Thus, society is being ‘scientifically’ reengineered to serve the corporate lords. The old-fashioned terms of ‘supply’ and ‘demand’ don’t apply any more. Consumer demand is artificially manipulated to soak up whatever global corporations decide they want to manufacture.In other words, Technocracy is a complete takeover of both the means of production and consumption, a feat never before attempted nor achieved in the history of the world.
You might never have heard of Technocracy before, but can you feel the manacle of scientific dictatorship tightening around your neck?
In my opinion, this is why Britain recently voted to leave the European Union, which is openly called a Technocracy in the European press. This is also why Trumpism is accelerating in America.
Simply put, people don’t have to understand the cause in order to feel the pain.
Oh, would that there were a castle on a hill that we could assault and demand that our grievances be heard. However, because Technocracy and Technocrats are so thoroughly infused into society, institutions and corporate culture, it is impossible to hold their feet to the fire.
(Permission is granted to repost this article but only with complete attribution to the author and link back to the original page.)
Saturday, July 2, 2016
Thursday, June 30, 2016
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Tarpley's going nuts
One of my favorites is Webster G. Tarpley. unmatched for European history, trails
to the present but he starts getting weak as he goes east, and is apparently seduced
by the legend of Islamic civilization. While he doesn't say this stuff, his behavior
would indicate this.
Well, he's been going ballistic over Trump and now Brexit. the former is a matter I
have no opinion on, but Tarpley seems to be as megalomaniac as he claims Trump
is. And demands Trump's psychiatric records because supposedly you can't be
diagnoses OCD and whatever Trump claims without a doctor. Bullshit. with half a
brain and information online you can self diagnose. Tarpley uses the royal we a lot,
in such context it can only be himself not some movement. The so called
"interventions" are a few people with a sign.
Brexit is evaluated by some as a game of the elites to play some Hegelian game.
Others think it was a disaster for them and the beginning of the end of the EU.
Frankly, elites would anticipate and have a plan B. I was glad to see Brexit win.
Webster of course is on the anti Brexit bandwagon.
to the present but he starts getting weak as he goes east, and is apparently seduced
by the legend of Islamic civilization. While he doesn't say this stuff, his behavior
would indicate this.
Well, he's been going ballistic over Trump and now Brexit. the former is a matter I
have no opinion on, but Tarpley seems to be as megalomaniac as he claims Trump
is. And demands Trump's psychiatric records because supposedly you can't be
diagnoses OCD and whatever Trump claims without a doctor. Bullshit. with half a
brain and information online you can self diagnose. Tarpley uses the royal we a lot,
in such context it can only be himself not some movement. The so called
"interventions" are a few people with a sign.
Brexit is evaluated by some as a game of the elites to play some Hegelian game.
Others think it was a disaster for them and the beginning of the end of the EU.
Frankly, elites would anticipate and have a plan B. I was glad to see Brexit win.
Webster of course is on the anti Brexit bandwagon.
Friday, June 24, 2016
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Must See! Planet Mars Has Something Moving Under It's Surface!
finding life offworld does not validate evolution. One writer years ago suggested the real
reason for hiding indications on Mars was that since evolution is such a crapshoot it is
unlikely to have repeated elsewhere than earth, so would indicate creation to find life
elsewhere!
God could easily have created life elsewhere, or it could have originated on earth and
gone elsewhere during some pre flood or later lost high tech civilization.
Monday, June 13, 2016
Army Chaplaincy Manual Reprint Shows Gen. Vallely Lied
http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance136.htm
http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance137.htm
Gen. Paul Vallely tried to do an American Spring march on Washington DC. then
he was outed by some of the patriot militia movement he was appealing to, as
having co authored Mind War with Michael Aquino of the church of satan who
founded the temple of set.
So everyone backed off. It would either have been a putsch and put Vallely and
Boykin and McInerny in charge, or a massacre being an excuse for martial law
which would put Vallely and Boykin and McInerny in charge effectively, through
their friends who would administer this.
Vallely falsely claims he never advocated such a thing was no part of it, that is
easy to refute online.
But he also claims he did not know Aquino was a satanist in those days, and had
almost no contact with him except to interrogate him when the Army investigated
Aquino, sez Vallely, for satanist activity.
That is another lie. THERE COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN SUCH AN INVESTIGATION.
Why? because the Army already accepted satanism for chaplaincy.
The only available Army manual showing this, dates from several years later. So
it could be argued it was not legal then. But that is a lie, because the no longer
available 1980 version is available as a reprint.
the 1978 Army Manual for Chaplains (not exact title) references satanism as
accepted to have chaplains, it is titled 165-13. It does not exist online except on
satanist sites, so can easily be dismissed by some as a fraud they constructed.
But the 1980 manual's satanist section REFERS TO 165-13 to say that no new
information or updates are available in 1980 for the satanism chaplaincy except
a change of address for the church of satan
"regarding proof US Army recognized satanism as legitimate religion for chaplaincy I bought a copy april 1980 "Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups A Handbook Supplement for Chaplains" from military/info PO Box 41211 Plymouth, MN 55441 which sells photocopies of old military manuals.
Table of Contents, Revision chart "Other" Groups lists American Council of Witches,
Church of satan and Gardnerian Wicca among others.
Church of satan is on page VII-21 and reads"
"The original description pertaining to the Church of satan, appears on pages vii-17 through vii-22, in Department of the Army Pamphlet no. 165-13
"No revision in content of original description has been made, however, please note change in mailing address listed at top of page vii-17 rom
Church of satan po box 7633 San Francisco, California, 94102
to church of satan PO Box 896 Daly City, California, 94017"
That's all. "
I posted that on http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2016/06/did-general-paul-e-vallely-assist.html
I corrected the typos in my original post.
http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance137.htm
Gen. Paul Vallely tried to do an American Spring march on Washington DC. then
he was outed by some of the patriot militia movement he was appealing to, as
having co authored Mind War with Michael Aquino of the church of satan who
founded the temple of set.
So everyone backed off. It would either have been a putsch and put Vallely and
Boykin and McInerny in charge, or a massacre being an excuse for martial law
which would put Vallely and Boykin and McInerny in charge effectively, through
their friends who would administer this.
Vallely falsely claims he never advocated such a thing was no part of it, that is
easy to refute online.
But he also claims he did not know Aquino was a satanist in those days, and had
almost no contact with him except to interrogate him when the Army investigated
Aquino, sez Vallely, for satanist activity.
That is another lie. THERE COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN SUCH AN INVESTIGATION.
Why? because the Army already accepted satanism for chaplaincy.
The only available Army manual showing this, dates from several years later. So
it could be argued it was not legal then. But that is a lie, because the no longer
available 1980 version is available as a reprint.
the 1978 Army Manual for Chaplains (not exact title) references satanism as
accepted to have chaplains, it is titled 165-13. It does not exist online except on
satanist sites, so can easily be dismissed by some as a fraud they constructed.
But the 1980 manual's satanist section REFERS TO 165-13 to say that no new
information or updates are available in 1980 for the satanism chaplaincy except
a change of address for the church of satan
"regarding proof US Army recognized satanism as legitimate religion for chaplaincy I bought a copy april 1980 "Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups A Handbook Supplement for Chaplains" from military/info PO Box 41211 Plymouth, MN 55441 which sells photocopies of old military manuals.
Table of Contents, Revision chart "Other" Groups lists American Council of Witches,
Church of satan and Gardnerian Wicca among others.
Church of satan is on page VII-21 and reads"
"The original description pertaining to the Church of satan, appears on pages vii-17 through vii-22, in Department of the Army Pamphlet no. 165-13
"No revision in content of original description has been made, however, please note change in mailing address listed at top of page vii-17 rom
Church of satan po box 7633 San Francisco, California, 94102
to church of satan PO Box 896 Daly City, California, 94017"
That's all. "
I posted that on http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2016/06/did-general-paul-e-vallely-assist.html
I corrected the typos in my original post.
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Newt Gingrich?
From Constance Cumbey's blog:
- He is and throughout his political life has been one of the world's leading Globalists.
- It was Newt Gingrich who set up international networks of legislators to back each other politically in their separate countries [that's right -- COUNTRIES -- not STATES]. You can read all about it in Anne-Marie Slaughter's Princeton University Press book A NEW WORLD ORDER. Anne-Marie Slaughter served as Assistant Secretary of State under Hillary Clinton. If you already own the book or plan to acquire the book, turn to pages 113, 126, 130, and 294 to read up on Newt's career and joint projects with leaders in the Soviet Duma.
- Newt Gingrich was from the beginning one of the primary backers of the World Trade Organization (W.T.O.); NAFTA (North American Free Trade Organization); and other globalist measures.
- Newt Gingrich is an unabashed New Ager -- one whom I have carefully tracked since reading in one of Marilyn Ferguson's 1983 Leading Edge Bulletin about the "brave Georgia Congressman" (Newt Gingrich) who was doing so very much to advance their New Age agenda. Newt's New Age mentoring was, inter alia, by Alvin & Heidi Toffler and John Naisbitt.
- Newt Gingrich's former Congressional campaign manager, Chip Kahn, stated in an 1983 magazine interview (Mother Jones, November 1984), that no matter no much good, he Chip Kahn did in the future, he could never do enough good to offset the evil he had helped unleash on the world by helping Newt Gingrich be elected to Congress.
Sunday, May 29, 2016
date rape attempt thwarted - speak up when you see something
https://www.yahoo.com/news/3-women-hailed-heroes-thwarting-053547166.html
"Three women enjoying a quiet dinner in Santa Monica Thursday night went from their cheese platter to heroically thwarting an alleged date rape attempt.
One of the women, Sonia Ulrich, shared the incredible story on Facebook in a post that has since gone viral.
Ulrich describes how she, along with friends Monica Kenyon and Marla Saltzer, were dining at the restaurant Fig at the Fairmont when Kenyon spotted a man at a nearby table putting something in his date’s drink without her knowing.
Instead of sitting quietly, Ulrich approached the woman in the bathroom and told her what Kenyon had seen.
The three women also notified the restaurant staff, who apparently asked security to look into it. According to Ulrich’s post, the team at Fig at the Fairmont were able to see the man empty the vial into the woman’s drink in their security footage and call the police.
While the woman boldly went back to the table as if nothing had happened, the restaurant staff delayed getting the bill to the man so the police could make the arrest.
Sergeant Jeff Glaser of the Santa Monica Police Department confirmed the incident to Mashable. The man, Michael Hsu, has been arrested and is being held on a $1 million bail, he said.
Fig at the Fairmont was not able to comment when approached by Mashable.
Ulrich said other diners erupted with praise for the trio after the arrest, and shared their own stories about similar incidents that had happened to them or people they knew.
These three women definitely have the right approach: It’s always best to speak up.
As Ulrich wrote: “to everyone who sees this and shares this and reminds each other that yes, you SHOULD say something. Even if it’s awkward or weird or just uncertain if anything can be done.”"
Saturday, May 28, 2016
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Ramapo and New Madrid faults ready to go?
http://www.prepperfortress.com/fears-earthquake-nj-pa-seismic-faults-ocean-give-off-gases/ might be nothing might be Ramapo fault system go (and take New Madrid fault with it? or trigger through faults in the sea floor the earthquake that will finish the slide of Cumbre Vieja and put 150 feet of water onto our coasts?)
Monday, May 16, 2016
last tape Randall Baer made before he was murdered.
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=1240616437
Randall Baer went over a cliff a few days before his book came out,
Inside The New Age Nightmare. There was hardly any blood yet he'd
gone through the windshield in a 350 foot fall, no skid marks, his
briefcase had been broken over and rifled through. There was some
push to close the case fast, the Santa Fe police were not happy closing
it. Aside from "religious" interests and demon influence on people to
silence him, New Age has always been a big money making thing,
and his many lectures and his status as an ex New Age leader and
founder of the crystal system using many gemstones in arrangements
meant he had credibility with New Agers. During a meditation the
horrible reality was shown him like a veil pulled aside and he saw the
real evil behind it all. Someone had been praying for him. At first, he
tried to extract for Christian use what seemed neutral in New Age
practices including crystals, but found it didn't work.
Randall Baer went over a cliff a few days before his book came out,
Inside The New Age Nightmare. There was hardly any blood yet he'd
gone through the windshield in a 350 foot fall, no skid marks, his
briefcase had been broken over and rifled through. There was some
push to close the case fast, the Santa Fe police were not happy closing
it. Aside from "religious" interests and demon influence on people to
silence him, New Age has always been a big money making thing,
and his many lectures and his status as an ex New Age leader and
founder of the crystal system using many gemstones in arrangements
meant he had credibility with New Agers. During a meditation the
horrible reality was shown him like a veil pulled aside and he saw the
real evil behind it all. Someone had been praying for him. At first, he
tried to extract for Christian use what seemed neutral in New Age
practices including crystals, but found it didn't work.
Sunday, May 15, 2016
more manifest sons of God garbage
I love this description "most pious blasphemy." while the overall site has problems
like approving of Ruckman and his KJBO ideas and of course rejects the real
presence in the Eucharist and considers the RC the whore Babylon and if EO is or
gets on its radar would condemn it the same, it has a lot of worthwhile information.
http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/terra_forming.htm
like approving of Ruckman and his KJBO ideas and of course rejects the real
presence in the Eucharist and considers the RC the whore Babylon and if EO is or
gets on its radar would condemn it the same, it has a lot of worthwhile information.
http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/terra_forming.htm
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Monday, May 9, 2016
remote viewing reconsidered.
http://politicallyunclassifiable.blogspot.com/2011/10/ed-dames-on-art-bell-at-coast-to-coast.html
since writing this, I have come to the conclusion that remote viewing is demonically
aided. It may be possible to do something like this without demons, but the whole
thing started with Scientologists who were using information from Hubbard who was
according to his son's biography Messiah or Madman? was a secret satanist and user
of Crowleyite rituals in private. Crowley in turn depended a lot on Vajrayana type
Mahayana Buddhism which is a whole other ball of wax I don't want to deal with here.
But the concept may have come from there. Mahayana Buddhism is so called "Greater
Vehicle" Buddhism which is the type we know most about. Zen may be a bit of a
throwback to the original Theravada or Hinayana ("Lesser Vehicle") Buddhism, but
it includes at times the same notion of the enlightened man being free from all moral
restraints and beyond good and evil. These greater and lesser labels were of course
applied by the Mahayana.
Mahayana in turn is Buddhism plus a plethora of less respectable pagan elements.
Tibetan has at times been the most depraved and is a product of hindu throwback
Buddhist tantrics plus Bon the pre Buddhist paganism and sorcery of Tibet.
The last straw for my suspicions was finding out that the trainees and practitioners
of Remote Viewing, as it was developed at Stanford Research Institute, often fall
back on a "sigil." of which the less said the better.
you can pursue the matter of dangers of Remote Viewing (and while you're at it
of Reiki) on youtube look for Ray Youngen for the latter. four or five videos
were made by an ex remote viewer and I think there are others. These two systems
are not related, but Reiki is even more demonic than RV.
Nevertheless, I think that the fact that Ed Dames came up with the RV result of
no prior lives, no reincarnation, only an illusion of this because of people in the
past who strongly resemble you, and having memories of others that you THINK
are your own in regession, is accurate, it is very similar to my own conclusions
balancing the Bible against reported experiences. At most, reincarnation would
be a kind of possession of the fetus, with two souls sharing one body. not healthy.
But I won't use RV sourced information anymore now that I know the problem.
Before I knew this, I had filled out an application to study this with Ed Dames'
organization online, and I felt someone "view" me. The atmosphere the impression
of the person, was thick and dark grey and a quality I have run into before that
while kind of detatched and neither friendly nor hostile could become hostile and
somehow aside from that seems similar to demonic related stuff.
I didn't follow up on the application.
since writing this, I have come to the conclusion that remote viewing is demonically
aided. It may be possible to do something like this without demons, but the whole
thing started with Scientologists who were using information from Hubbard who was
according to his son's biography Messiah or Madman? was a secret satanist and user
of Crowleyite rituals in private. Crowley in turn depended a lot on Vajrayana type
Mahayana Buddhism which is a whole other ball of wax I don't want to deal with here.
But the concept may have come from there. Mahayana Buddhism is so called "Greater
Vehicle" Buddhism which is the type we know most about. Zen may be a bit of a
throwback to the original Theravada or Hinayana ("Lesser Vehicle") Buddhism, but
it includes at times the same notion of the enlightened man being free from all moral
restraints and beyond good and evil. These greater and lesser labels were of course
applied by the Mahayana.
Mahayana in turn is Buddhism plus a plethora of less respectable pagan elements.
Tibetan has at times been the most depraved and is a product of hindu throwback
Buddhist tantrics plus Bon the pre Buddhist paganism and sorcery of Tibet.
The last straw for my suspicions was finding out that the trainees and practitioners
of Remote Viewing, as it was developed at Stanford Research Institute, often fall
back on a "sigil." of which the less said the better.
you can pursue the matter of dangers of Remote Viewing (and while you're at it
of Reiki) on youtube look for Ray Youngen for the latter. four or five videos
were made by an ex remote viewer and I think there are others. These two systems
are not related, but Reiki is even more demonic than RV.
Nevertheless, I think that the fact that Ed Dames came up with the RV result of
no prior lives, no reincarnation, only an illusion of this because of people in the
past who strongly resemble you, and having memories of others that you THINK
are your own in regession, is accurate, it is very similar to my own conclusions
balancing the Bible against reported experiences. At most, reincarnation would
be a kind of possession of the fetus, with two souls sharing one body. not healthy.
But I won't use RV sourced information anymore now that I know the problem.
Before I knew this, I had filled out an application to study this with Ed Dames'
organization online, and I felt someone "view" me. The atmosphere the impression
of the person, was thick and dark grey and a quality I have run into before that
while kind of detatched and neither friendly nor hostile could become hostile and
somehow aside from that seems similar to demonic related stuff.
I didn't follow up on the application.
Sunday, May 8, 2016
Dominionist semi Christianity now has a semi satanist connection
What Boykin has been up to.
http://amos37.com/the-gospel-according-to-dominionism/
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/300-religious-right-forming-it-own-spartan-army
he's friends with Vallely who lied about the Aquino business and Boykin is with Joyner who is a closet luciferian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJGyKO3HoZE Rick Joyner's Demonic Church time stamp 28:45
Boykin generally says the things that please Christians. outraged about the right things, though he says the Constitution is inspired by God and 'The Bible is Referenced Four Times More Than Any Other Document in our Constitution' when it does not ONCE reference the Bible or any other document whatsoever.
Which tells me he hasn't read the Constitution much, or figures no one else has and is a damn liar.
Vallely lied because he claimed the Army wanted Aquino investigated for his satanism, but the Army Chaplaincy document from 1980 includes this as a religion they accept for chaplaincy, AND REFERENCES THE 1978 HANDBOOK. I bought a copy of the former from a company dealing in discontinued military handbooks. the 1978 document is now available only through online satanist sites, which causes some to question its legitimacy. but the 1980 handbook refers to it, validating it.
for the background to all this, read http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance136.htm
Did "Tea Party Darling" Paul Vallely Help Facilitate Military Satanism?" part 1 of 4 by
Constance Cumbey and http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance137.htm
"Did Major General (Ret.) Paul E. Vallely Help Facilitate Military Satanism?" part 2 of 4 by
Constance Cumbey (she has been too busy to get the other two parts done. And when she
started looking into this, reviewing some old material from the 1980s due to an invitation to
join a patriotic group that was led by Vallely, and phoning people and writing, she suddenly
had an almost disastrous incident with her car as if someone had messed with the brakes and
acceleration system and almost plowed into a tree or something I forget but it wouldn't stop and
I think it sped up. There was also an upsurge of leg pain which comes along anyway. Then
she gets into Republican Party activity, don't know who for. Coincidental? or diversionary?
while the information is old to her, it is totally new ground she is breaking for modern readers
of her blog. And precisely the sort of forgotten subject some people would not want dragged up
again. Various forms of civilized seeming satanism with its power and glory orientation are
very comfortable with Republican party and conservative and military focus type Americanism,
with it power and glory and wealth orientation. the satanists and perverts and whatnot in the
Republican party are covert, mostly. the neopagans and suchlike weirdness and immoral and perverted in the Democrat scene are usually not covert. And the present tendency to treat
"sexual harassment" as a "feminist" issue of "respect for women" instead of the old fashioned
"morals and character" issue, is not helpful. )
http://amos37.com/the-gospel-according-to-dominionism/
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/300-religious-right-forming-it-own-spartan-army
he's friends with Vallely who lied about the Aquino business and Boykin is with Joyner who is a closet luciferian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJGyKO3HoZE Rick Joyner's Demonic Church time stamp 28:45
Boykin generally says the things that please Christians. outraged about the right things, though he says the Constitution is inspired by God and 'The Bible is Referenced Four Times More Than Any Other Document in our Constitution' when it does not ONCE reference the Bible or any other document whatsoever.
Which tells me he hasn't read the Constitution much, or figures no one else has and is a damn liar.
Vallely lied because he claimed the Army wanted Aquino investigated for his satanism, but the Army Chaplaincy document from 1980 includes this as a religion they accept for chaplaincy, AND REFERENCES THE 1978 HANDBOOK. I bought a copy of the former from a company dealing in discontinued military handbooks. the 1978 document is now available only through online satanist sites, which causes some to question its legitimacy. but the 1980 handbook refers to it, validating it.
for the background to all this, read http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance136.htm
Did "Tea Party Darling" Paul Vallely Help Facilitate Military Satanism?" part 1 of 4 by
Constance Cumbey and http://newswithviews.com/Cumbey/constance137.htm
"Did Major General (Ret.) Paul E. Vallely Help Facilitate Military Satanism?" part 2 of 4 by
Constance Cumbey (she has been too busy to get the other two parts done. And when she
started looking into this, reviewing some old material from the 1980s due to an invitation to
join a patriotic group that was led by Vallely, and phoning people and writing, she suddenly
had an almost disastrous incident with her car as if someone had messed with the brakes and
acceleration system and almost plowed into a tree or something I forget but it wouldn't stop and
I think it sped up. There was also an upsurge of leg pain which comes along anyway. Then
she gets into Republican Party activity, don't know who for. Coincidental? or diversionary?
while the information is old to her, it is totally new ground she is breaking for modern readers
of her blog. And precisely the sort of forgotten subject some people would not want dragged up
again. Various forms of civilized seeming satanism with its power and glory orientation are
very comfortable with Republican party and conservative and military focus type Americanism,
with it power and glory and wealth orientation. the satanists and perverts and whatnot in the
Republican party are covert, mostly. the neopagans and suchlike weirdness and immoral and perverted in the Democrat scene are usually not covert. And the present tendency to treat
"sexual harassment" as a "feminist" issue of "respect for women" instead of the old fashioned
"morals and character" issue, is not helpful. )
Saturday, May 7, 2016
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Javier Solana a serious problem maker
For some time I have been bitching about NATO incursion into Eastern Europe
provoking Russia and making a dangerous situation.
"Does it surprise us, who easy it was for J. Solana to get the former Eastern-block States into NATO "
was on a link about a book by a Russian defector who named Strobe Talbott as a Russian dupe.
http://freiberg.blogspot.com/2008/02/comrad-j.html (Farmer Bjorn some years back outted
himself as a worshipper of some "blue god" which sounds like feri witchcraft, which was
making incursions from USA into Nordic countries some years ago, might be the same
thing, they have among their "deities" a "blue god," one of the rare instances but by no
means unheard of, when a demon can use the color blue. Bjorn was also publicly cavorting
with his mistress online back then and not divorced. exactly what was the upshot of all
this, which appeared on Constance Cumbey's blog, she was distressed by all this when she
heard of it, I don't know. she kept the link to his blog on her blog because of the value of
his information. http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2009/07/2005-paper-from-old-bjorn-not-one-i.html
)
So now I know who to blame for the NATO expansion. Solana.
Solana is considered by some a candidate to be the antichrist. And his European military (I think
that's the subject) directive is numbered 666, something he can't be ignorant of implications
and the EU building resembles an old painting of what the partly shattered or unfinished Tower
of Babel looked like. not a good sign.
The whole thing, EU as covert Nazi project and UN as Theosophical Society project, their
Lucis Trust running the weird meditation chapel someone reported had creepy vibes - well, with
this combination, I can only assume some people involved know and approve of the antichrist
implications.
When Solana got NATO moving east, Russia was a wreck. But now it has its act together. Solana
may have thought provoking Russia into an attack that could be repelled, would be an excuse to
unite Europe seriously into one nation with one army.
But now Russia is unbeatable. as for why, Wikipedia discussion of their weapons is a good start.
the neocons are continuing all this.
Because of issues raised in http://seventhchapterofdaniel.blogspot.com I don't think Solana can
be the antichrist, however much he might want to be. Unless transhumanist technology lets him
survive in stasis for 20 to several hundreds of years.
but he is trouble.
provoking Russia and making a dangerous situation.
"Does it surprise us, who easy it was for J. Solana to get the former Eastern-block States into NATO "
was on a link about a book by a Russian defector who named Strobe Talbott as a Russian dupe.
http://freiberg.blogspot.com/2008/02/comrad-j.html (Farmer Bjorn some years back outted
himself as a worshipper of some "blue god" which sounds like feri witchcraft, which was
making incursions from USA into Nordic countries some years ago, might be the same
thing, they have among their "deities" a "blue god," one of the rare instances but by no
means unheard of, when a demon can use the color blue. Bjorn was also publicly cavorting
with his mistress online back then and not divorced. exactly what was the upshot of all
this, which appeared on Constance Cumbey's blog, she was distressed by all this when she
heard of it, I don't know. she kept the link to his blog on her blog because of the value of
his information. http://cumbey.blogspot.com/2009/07/2005-paper-from-old-bjorn-not-one-i.html
)
So now I know who to blame for the NATO expansion. Solana.
Solana is considered by some a candidate to be the antichrist. And his European military (I think
that's the subject) directive is numbered 666, something he can't be ignorant of implications
and the EU building resembles an old painting of what the partly shattered or unfinished Tower
of Babel looked like. not a good sign.
The whole thing, EU as covert Nazi project and UN as Theosophical Society project, their
Lucis Trust running the weird meditation chapel someone reported had creepy vibes - well, with
this combination, I can only assume some people involved know and approve of the antichrist
implications.
When Solana got NATO moving east, Russia was a wreck. But now it has its act together. Solana
may have thought provoking Russia into an attack that could be repelled, would be an excuse to
unite Europe seriously into one nation with one army.
But now Russia is unbeatable. as for why, Wikipedia discussion of their weapons is a good start.
the neocons are continuing all this.
Because of issues raised in http://seventhchapterofdaniel.blogspot.com I don't think Solana can
be the antichrist, however much he might want to be. Unless transhumanist technology lets him
survive in stasis for 20 to several hundreds of years.
but he is trouble.
Sunday, May 1, 2016
Body of 'Russian Rambo,' who called in airstrike on own position, flown home
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/30/europe/body-of-russian-rambo-flown-home/index.html
"CNN)Alexander Prokhorenko was battling to free the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra. But he found himself surrounded by Islamic militants. He feared that he would be captured, tortured, killed and his body mutilated.
"CNN)Alexander Prokhorenko was battling to free the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra. But he found himself surrounded by Islamic militants. He feared that he would be captured, tortured, killed and his body mutilated.
He preferred to die with dignity.
So he called in an airstrike on his own position.
That was his contribution to liberating Palmyra from ISIS terrorists -- and to Russian glory. It was also his end. He was 25 years old.
His death was announced March 24.
And so the legend begins."
(the average person looking to "die with dignity" is not facing that sort of thing. which
sometimes includes homosexual rape. Early Christian writers didn't care for the pagan
favoring of suicide except to prevent rape. Later Augustine got it treated as a mortal sin
even in that situation. The men who fought Indians in the American west and risked torturous
death if captured, had a saying, "save the last bullet for yourself." the Kurdish women fighters
keep a "weapon of last resort" some people you do not want to be taken alive by.)
death if captured, had a saying, "save the last bullet for yourself." the Kurdish women fighters
keep a "weapon of last resort" some people you do not want to be taken alive by.)
Sunday, April 17, 2016
FEMA High Level Briefing Mega Earthquake Swarms Coming
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
We just might be in trouble....
http://www.theprepperdome.com/breaking-news-yellowstone-public-seismographs-taken-off-line-wait-til-you-see-why/
note at least one 6 pointer earthquake at Yellowstone in the past few days.
note at least one 6 pointer earthquake at Yellowstone in the past few days.
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Friday, March 25, 2016
tarpley historian shows libertarian origins, nature and weaknesses.
http://tarpley.net/how-dying-libertarianism-has-become-the-entrance-to-trump-fascism/#more-9529
i.e., why I'm not voting for Trump or Hillary (they will probably both get the
nominations for their respective parties).
i.e., why I'm not voting for Trump or Hillary (they will probably both get the
nominations for their respective parties).
Friday, March 18, 2016
MORE INTERFERENCE IN POSTING BY BLOGSPOT/GOOGLE?
not long ago, I documented such a problem of disappearing posts at cumbey.BlogSpot.com by
another New Age researcher whose focus is new age as closet Nazism. Now I've been hit. this
MIGHT have gone into a spam file, can't imagine why. but here it is.
another New Age researcher whose focus is new age as closet Nazism. Now I've been hit. this
MIGHT have gone into a spam file, can't imagine why. but here it is.
how the illuminati took over the
vatican this book was hard to find being pulled from publication soon
after it was published. Rivera mentioned briefly in foreword not by
Compton. THIRD ATTEMPT TO POST, SECOND ONE LASTED LONGER.
The United Nations 2030 Agenda decoded:
It's a blueprint for the global enslavement of humanity under the
boot of corporate masters (big capitalism uses socialism to get power
and more wealth.)
Second post in about 24 hours I did not
post for 7 days before the last one. Count the am to pm cycle.
without anyone yelling, posting slowed someone noted. one post and
total hysteria breaks loose. 12 posts to my one. My warnings on
occult or fringe sites against accepting spirit influence are treated
as evidence against me when any sane (or not pushing an occult agenda
themselves) person would see it as evidence supporting me. At the
very least they are the sort who denounce spiritual warfare and
consider it unhealthy to even think about such things. Such people
are tools of satan.
Constance, how can you tolerate those
people? its not about me, when I'm not posting they hound the RC.
they drag them into interminable arguments. even when presented with
Scripture they don't
shut up. they seem to want to ruin
your blog. And they have never kept themselves to one Christine
bashing post a day, if someone posted already that doesn't stop three
or four more appearing.
Constance, please ban anonymous
posting. Rarely do they post anything worthwhile. If I was banned
they would keep dragging your blog down into their rants and mutual
back scratching about jesuits and RC and harlot church. (I could make
a good case that IF the harlot is a church then she is the
Reformation and the splintering protestant churches are her harlot
daughters, she is called the mother of harlots, remember? I only
suspect this I don't buy it.) The only time they attack real new age
or globalism is when it intersects with RC, or might be an immediate
problem personally.
one of them said he/she had
thrown your books in a dumpster years ago, and favors Tupper
Saussey (saucy tupperware?) whose focus is Jesuit only and totally
misses the whole theosophical and bailey and ferguson etc. material
you found which is ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE.
So what is such a person doing here?
one can construct a fake ID and post
anyway and that be banned if one acts up.
Many times I wanted to delete and
rewrite to add to posts but after being accused of posting and
deleting something "vile" I didn't dare. I tried again
recently and was falsely accused of posting a psychic services ad.
And tellingly, their greatest
anger is directed at my turning a few new age favored stuff AGAINST
THE NEW AGE. Why? they didn't challenge the pagan postings.
Why? proof:
And I DO have a life, I read and type
fast, and I get a lot done some days while I
am between computer activity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)