I KNEW IT! The UFO "Majestic" documents fake, but......

http://www.michaelsheiser.com/MJ%20Test%20article.pdf

This article shows reasons to dismiss the whole Majestic or MJ12
story, or at least the documents that are involved.

Another reason to reject them, is that Robert and/or Ryan Wood,
the recipients of the ton of extra MJ12 files, submitted them to, of
all people, Michael Aquino ex of the Army, for evaluation as a
psychological warfare expert.

Aren't there other psywar experts available? Why this guy?
(Google temple of set and presidio if you want to know more
about him.)

Aquino's conclusion was that they were not a product of a psyop.

And if that sonofabitch satanist closet nazi says they are not
a product of a psyop, then they are the product of a psyop of some
sort.

I have concluded some time ago that these documents were
at least dubious, but represented an effort to redirect attention
off something real. Disinformation functions primarily to
either put you on a wrong trail, or off a right trail you were on,
and usually consists of a lot of truth.

At the time the papers came out, all parties listed were dead. There
was no indication of any provision for continuation of the group
into another generation of replacements. IF such a group had
existed, this is exactly the impression you would want people
to have.

One name that would fit the profile of an MJ12 member, was
not on that list - Clyde Tombaugh, who was still alive when
they were published, who had discovered The Black Knight
humongous satellite in a polar orbit in the late 1950s when
no one had the ability to put anything that large in orbit, and
no one had the ability to anything into a polar orbit.

When Tombaugh did die, in Las Crusces, NM, his widow
said government people came and took all his papers.

I think we can safely assume that the new papers, which do
as I recall mention provision for continuing the organization,
will only serve to put researchers on wrong tracks trying
to investigate, contact and harass the alleged members, and
nose around in all the wrong stuff, while any actual replacers
go unnoticed.

This study Heiser describes, leaves The Twining Memo as
legitimate, which oddly enough in Sept. 23 AD 1947,
complains of "The lack of physical evidence in the shape 
of crash recovered exhibits which would undeniably 
prove the existence of these subjects."
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/49ufo_files/03files/mildoc001.html

Since the Roswell wreckage was taken to Wright Patterson,
perhaps something was going on even then that was off the
official radar, and the public announcement of the weather
balloon story was as much to deceive superiors in the normal
chain of command as anyone else.

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/164997/mayan-2012-apocalypse-prediction-might-have-been-mistranslated/

Mayan calendar doesn't say anything about an end of the world,
just that the calendar ends in 2012 and restarts.

Which of course means that whatever catastrophe might happen,
involving nibiru, has nothing to do with this, and probably won't
happen in 2012. My best guess, and even that of Marshall
Masters (dupe of the Kolbrin Bible fraud an obvious 19th
century philosophical scam to judge by the content), is that at
minimum it won't hit till 2013.

Jacco Van der Woorp on Masters' research crew, has somehow
concluded that Nibiru was parallel (since below the ecliptic) to
Jupiter I think it was (or Saturn?) in 2009. My guess is, it is not
what pulls Uranus and Neptune down a bit, that is probably
something else out there in a permanent distant relationship to
the sun, maybe they orbit a shared center of gravity or something
like that, and this thing is either a new capture or does an orbit
around the sun and the other thing, otherwise we'd see it more
often.

An earlier post regarding the disaster in AD 536, this is now
complicated by the fact that this was also the time of Justinian's
Plague, and flying bronze shields were seen, and dark cloaked
people also.

In the Middle Ages at the time of the Black Death, hooded
cloaked figures were seen in fields, with long sticks making
reaping motions, but not cutting the wheat. The Grim Reaper
dates from these, which one interesting video suggests were aliens
spraying a pathogen.

The c. 200 BC splatter of asteroids across northern Europe
and Russia still remain as a definite celestial event, however,
like we went through something's debris field.

contra neo Confederates: South Carolina's declaration of secession from the USA shows slavery the sole motive

So much for the claim that the Southen secession that caused the American Civil War was not about slavery. Sure there are plenty of references to the Constitution and earlier order and failure to abide by that, but all the specifics of those violations of the Constitutional rights of the self described "slaveholding states" were without exception, regarding slaves. 

This is regarding South Carolina's secession, of course, and each of the slaveholding states had their own declaration of secession, but this will give you and idea. 

Confederate States of America - Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union

The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.

And now the State of South Carolina having resumed her separate and equal place among nations, deems it due to herself, to the remaining United States of America, and to the nations of the world, that she should declare the immediate causes which have led to this act.

In the year 1765, that portion of the British Empire embracing Great Britain, undertook to make laws for the government of that portion composed of the thirteen American Colonies. A struggle for the right of self-government ensued, which resulted, on the 4th of July, 1776, in a Declaration, by the Colonies, "that they are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; and that, as free and independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do."

They further solemnly declared that whenever any "form of government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government." Deeming the Government of Great Britain to have become destructive of these ends, they declared that the Colonies "are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved."

In pursuance of this Declaration of Independence, each of the thirteen States proceeded to exercise its separate sovereignty; adopted for itself a Constitution, and appointed officers for the administration of government in all its departments-- Legislative, Executive and Judicial. For purposes of defense, they united their arms and their counsels; and, in 1778, they entered into a League known as the Articles of Confederation, whereby they agreed to entrust the administration of their external relations to a common agent, known as the Congress of the United States, expressly declaring, in the first Article "that each State retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right which is not, by this Confederation, expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled."

Under this Confederation the war of the Revolution was carried on, and on the 3rd of September, 1783, the contest ended, and a definite Treaty was signed by Great Britain, in which she acknowledged the independence of the Colonies in the following terms: "ARTICLE 1-- His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz: New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that he treats with them as such; and for himself, his heirs and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof."

Thus were established the two great principles asserted by the Colonies, namely: the right of a State to govern itself; and the right of a people to abolish a Government when it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was instituted. And concurrent with the establishment of these principles, was the fact, that each Colony became and was recognized by the mother Country a FREE, SOVEREIGN AND INDEPENDENT STATE.

In 1787, Deputies were appointed by the States to revise the Articles of Confederation, and on 17th September, 1787, these Deputies recommended for the adoption of the States, the Articles of Union, known as the Constitution of the United States.

The parties to whom this Constitution was submitted, were the several sovereign States; they were to agree or disagree, and when nine of them agreed the compact was to take effect among those concurring; and the General Government, as the common agent, was then invested with their authority.

If only nine of the thirteen States had concurred, the other four would have remained as they then were-- separate, sovereign States, independent of any of the provisions of the Constitution. In fact, two of the States did not accede to the Constitution until long after it had gone into operation among the other eleven; and during that interval, they each exercised the functions of an independent nation.

By this Constitution, certain duties were imposed upon the several States, and the exercise of certain of their powers was restrained, which necessarily implied their continued existence as sovereign States. But to remove all doubt, an amendment was added, which declared that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people. On the 23d May , 1788, South Carolina, by a Convention of her People, passed an Ordinance assenting to this Constitution, and afterwards altered her own Constitution, to conform herself to the obligations she had undertaken.

Thus was established, by compact between the States, a Government with definite objects and powers, limited to the express words of the grant. This limitation left the whole remaining mass of power subject to the clause reserving it to the States or to the people, and rendered unnecessary any specification of reserved rights.

We hold that the Government thus established is subject to the two great principles asserted in the Declaration of Independence; and we hold further, that the mode of its formation subjects it to a third fundamental principle, namely: the law of compact. We maintain that in every compact between two or more parties, the obligation is mutual; that the failure of one of the contracting parties to perform a material part of the agreement, entirely releases the obligation of the other; and that where no arbiter is provided, each party is remitted to his own judgment to determine the fact of failure, with all its consequences.

In the present case, that fact is established with certainty. We assert that fourteen of the States have deliberately refused, for years past, to fulfill their constitutional obligations, and we refer to their own Statutes for the proof.

The Constitution of the United States, in its fourth Article, provides as follows: "No person held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due."

This stipulation was so material to the compact, that without it that compact would not have been made. The greater number of the contracting parties held slaves, and they had previously evinced their estimate of the value of such a stipulation by making it a condition in the Ordinance for the government of the territory ceded by Virginia, which now composes the States north of the Ohio River.

The same article of the Constitution stipulates also for rendition by the several States of fugitives from justice from the other States.

The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.

The ends for which the Constitution was framed are declared by itself to be "to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity."

These ends it endeavored to accomplish by a Federal Government, in which each State was recognized as an equal, and had separate control over its own institutions. The right of property in slaves was recognized by giving to free persons distinct political rights, by giving them the right to represent, and burthening them with direct taxes for three-fifths of their slaves; by authorizing the importation of slaves for twenty years; and by stipulating for the rendition of fugitives from labor.

We affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by the action of the non-slaveholding States. Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States. They have encouraged and assisted thousands of our slaves to leave their homes; and those who remain, have been incited by emissaries, books and pictures to servile insurrection.

For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the forms of the Constitution, a sectional party has found within that Articleestablishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.

This sectional combination for the submersion of the Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety.

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States.

The guaranties of the Constitution will then no longer exist; the equal rights of the States will be lost. The slaveholding States will no longer have the power of self-government, or self-protection, and the Federal Government will have become their enemy.

Sectional interest and animosity will deepen the irritation, and all hope of remedy is rendered vain, by the fact that public opinion at the North has invested a great political error with the sanction of more erroneous religious belief.

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved, and that the State of South Carolina has resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent State; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.

Adopted December 24, 1860
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_geosec.asp  Georgia, slavery a major issue and some others.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_missec.asp  Mississippi announced their position was thoroughly identified with slavery.
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_texsec.asp Slavery the second issue, some more serious complaints of failure of the fed to protect them despite demands and funding to do so against Indians and Mexican bandits.

Pyramid energy - hmmmmm....

Reviewing various speculations presented as absolute
fact, regarding pyramid energy and the world grid and
ley lines, a recurring theme is that these were used -
when functional - to get energy for communications
and such like modern purposes. Anachronistic thinking
of the sort that reads modern motivations into the past.

The past was characterized by elites ruling the masses,
often with deception and lies and false miracles. Various
pagan temples had "gods" that moved and spoke, and
after the Christian takeover and demolition of such,
the mechanical devices inside these idols were found
and displayed.

Sure, these things were just puppets and crude robots.
Things that today are mere toys and work tools. But in
those days, no one knew about this but a very few, who
used the information and technology to keep the
masses cowed with awe of the priesthoods.

Whatever communications were in play, it was elite to
elite, not for the common man or even for the merchants
and so forth. It was strictly to promote the power and
status of a very few. Probably not even most kings knew
of this.

It was a major scam. Sure, technology advanced for the
time, but used for evil. Long ago looking at a display and
plaque with lecture on it, in The Rosicrucian Egyptian
Museum in San Jose, CA, I noticed this angle, the wise
elite few ruling the masses.

The Rosicrucians and others now recruit, by offering
this knowledge (usually cobbled together from various
sources and presented as Egyptian or whatever), once
reserved to the few to those among the many who will
pay out to get it, appealing to pride, ambition, greed,
power and status lust even if only to be experienced
as one who secretly knows,  and has a secret status
his neighbors don't know about, so he can secretly feel
superior, however pragmatically inferior, idiotic and
generally unemployable he may be. A ludicrous picture
of this is presented by one writer on the subject, an
incompetent slob growing poorer for the money paid
out for sloppy information and promotion with special
titles and stuff, who feels superior to the neighbors
while they look askance at him, a mess.

So in all liklihood, this technology in "Atlantean"
times or pre Flood civilization, whatever practical use
it might have been put to, was primarily in play to keep
people impressed with lying signs and wonders and
false miracles to keep the pagan cults going.

That doesn't mean this harnessing of energy is demonic
in nature, but it does mean it has a bad pedigree,
nothing to be in awe of, any more than you grovel in
awe at the sight of a battery and wires making a light
bulb glow. Though you might wisely grovel in awe
of the Creator YHWH Who made such things possible
and gave us the brains and skills to find it.

But be careful of Tesla. However well intentioned, he
seems to have been under some kind of influence at
times, and some of his stuff is primarily good for figuring
out how to blow yourself up and take a lot of people
with you. Usually this is in the patents you don't hear
much about. HAARP technology is based on several of
his patents, for instance.

List of 19th Century UFOs

I don't think we can blame all these on 20th century
human technology or whatever. Crashes like the one
described in the other post rule out demons at least
for that one (though possible involvement of pilots
with demons is another matter).

Of interest also is an earlier Japanese scroll, describing
a woman in a crashed or landed round flying thing,
with strange hieroglyphics similar to one reported by
abductees, and she had a box in her hands. This
device is reported by abductees, and used to be kept
out of published information by researchers, to keep
it as a test for legitimacy of reports.

Confirmation of a theory of mine about disguised spacecraft

http://www.miqel.com/reading_library/archived_stories/1800s-unknown-crash.html

This story relates to a meteor crash that really tore up the ground,
in 1865 or 1864 not sure what they mean by "last September."

when the trapper who relate story saw the thing, he described it
as a stone, that had compartments, a dark liquid, and hieroglyphics.

readers may recall that I speculated that some asteroids out there
are space bases either hollowed out and presumabley reinforced
and equipped asteroids or more likely bult from the ground up
so to speak, with an exterior that is somewhat self repairing or
the internal layers are, and the exterior will take impacts and not
transfer the force to the interior. This material would naturally
resemble an irregular rocky surface, and perhaps might be
deliberately made to look this way for reasons of disguise.

The Supposed Horrible Plan Secret Document

I have skimmed through the document linked on Alex Jones' site and
real-agenda that supposedly shows how FEMA is going to classify
the American public as the enemy, and I don't see any sign of this sort
of thing. Keeping order in a disaster situation is not treating the
American public as the enemy, except that segment that consists of
individuals and gangs of all races, that is the enemy to the American
public whenever it can be.

What are these people screaming about? This is mostly just a typical
government job description and contract seeking stuff, boring, and
all it shows is they expect something major enough to get ready.

This seems silly to me. The Constitution specifies action against
sedition and public disorder. What is the problem? (The problem
in part is that these people don't read the Constitution that carefully,
and don't want anyone telling them what to do, and guess what,
most of what some object to like taxes and driver's licenses and
stuff like that, is what they would eventually have to get around to
doing, should they create or get the chaos they want and install
themselves in power, and then have to reinvent the wheel, after
enough deaths on the road and from disease and whatnot, situations
that brought these laws on in the first place, and enough people
notice the pro active safety laws in the Bible that validate safety
laws and certification of competence to operate vehicles, use
weapons, etc.

Justina

Merry Christmas and a safe and Godly New Year

Here is a link to the Encyclical of Greek Orthodox Archdiocese

of America Archbishop Demetrios for the Feast of the Nativity

of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

http://www.goarch.org/news/archiepiscopalchristmas2011encyclical-en

This Guy Says It Very Well

(from comments on Constance Cumbey's blog.)


Maybe in calling for financial regulation I *have* contradicted what you call a tenet of the republican rightwing gospel. But I'm not a Republican - I'm British. I am aware that I have more in common with the Right than the Left, but I try to think by biblical categories that are 10 times older than notions of Left and Right.

Mosaic Law had free markets in goods but regulated markets in labour, money and land/property. A man was guaranteed food if he worked (ie, works his land) but there was no social security system - although charity was regarded as a duty.

God is wiser than man, so how much of that can we replicate today? Unless we de-industrialise, dissolve property ownership and and share all land out equitably (which I am not advocating) then we cannot get back to a system whereby a man is guaranteed food for work AND there is no social security system. It's one or the other. Which way to go is the Right/Left dilemma of our time.

But there is no reason not to have God's way, of free markets in goods and regulated markets in money. That is why I said what I did. http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11772087&postID=4058748648854562139

Crust upheaval and rupture the cause of the Japanese Tsunami

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/238638-Huge-Japan-Quake-Cracked-Open-Seafloor

San Francisco - The March 2011 megaquake off the coast of Japan opened up fissures as wide as 6 feet (3 meters) in the seafloor, a new study finds. 

.........
On a previous seafloor survey in 2006, the seafloor was covered by sediment, with many sea anemone thriving. No fissures were observed.

Approximately 10,500-to-17,500-feet (3,200-to-5,350-meters) below the ocean's surface, the researchers saw open fissures in "many places," Tsuji said. They ranged from around 3-to-6-feet (around 1-to-3-meters) across, though the researchers couldn't measure how deep these new cracks extended.

By combining their direct observations with seismic surveys of the seafloor, the researchers uncovered a series of complex faults around the zone where the continental crust off the coast of Japan is being forced under the Pacific tectonic plate. They found when the crust ruptured some 12 miles (20 km) below the planet's surface, it was powerful enough to rip all the way to the surface.

That rupture pushed up a massive amount of seafloor, which in turn triggered the huge tsunami that devastated the coast.

Meanwhile, the wedge of crust where the quake struck was not only thrust outward, but extended horizontally like an accordion, Tsuji reported. That explains the fissures, which occurred as the crust got stretched.

http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm

"The Religious Right claims, and their secular allies in the corporate elite similarly believe, that capitalism is God's ordained economic system for this world - almost as if Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Malthus were Biblical figures on a par with Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Nehemiah, and so forth; and that the system they devised - i.e., capitalism - finds its origins in the Bible and should be adhered to with as much ardor and ebullience as one would adhere to the injunctions of Holy Writ."
http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm

Intelligent Design and God Man and ET

At the enterprisemission.com is an article titled as above,
click to read it.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/IntelligentDesignandGod-Man-and-ET.htm

This is essentially the position of Lloyd Pye's Intervention Theory,
http://www.lloydpye.com/ and to sum it up, we are the product of
experiments by intelligent life from elsewhere.

Now, granted, evidence for ID is also evidence for IT (Intervention
Theory in any of its forms).

But that ignores an important thing. Where did ET come from?
Even if you argue that the creation of mankind on the sixth day
is stated so singly from the rest of it, instead of starting it with
God saying life incl. something made in His image and likeness
should come out of the ground, but instead He does that and
then makes a special move with mankind, that this is a telescoping
of events in which He used ET to make us, even IF you argue
that, or, that whatever the original human was it is now altered
by the ET intervention, perhaps part of the curse on Eve played
out perhaps not in her life but later, that birthing would be
more difficult, so the larger head is part of that, and oops, the
(maybe marsupial) greyskins decided they wanted us to look
large headed like them somewhat, was something God allowed
as part of this curse,

even IF you argue all this, you still have no solution to the
origin of life itself, let alone nonsentient matter throughout
the universe.

So its back to God. meanwhile, the interesting stuff these
intervention theorists find should not be ignored or
condemned, but fit it into the creationist model, whether
young earth, old earth, or midrange earth.

Justina