http://www.miqel.com/reading_library/archived_stories/1800s-unknown-crash.html
This story relates to a meteor crash that really tore up the ground,
in 1865 or 1864 not sure what they mean by "last September."
when the trapper who relate story saw the thing, he described it
as a stone, that had compartments, a dark liquid, and hieroglyphics.
readers may recall that I speculated that some asteroids out there
are space bases either hollowed out and presumabley reinforced
and equipped asteroids or more likely bult from the ground up
so to speak, with an exterior that is somewhat self repairing or
the internal layers are, and the exterior will take impacts and not
transfer the force to the interior. This material would naturally
resemble an irregular rocky surface, and perhaps might be
deliberately made to look this way for reasons of disguise.
I oppose abortion, perversion, sexism support govt. intervention w. limits I think outside the box. Eastern Orthodox but against Serbian cultic nationalism and imperialism. THIS SITE MAY USE COOKIES AND I CAN'T MAKE ANYTHING WORK TO GIVE YOU A CHOICE USE AT YOUR OWN RISK I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE COOKIES OR NOT.
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Friday, December 23, 2011
The Supposed Horrible Plan Secret Document
I have skimmed through the document linked on Alex Jones' site and
real-agenda that supposedly shows how FEMA is going to classify
the American public as the enemy, and I don't see any sign of this sort
of thing. Keeping order in a disaster situation is not treating the
American public as the enemy, except that segment that consists of
individuals and gangs of all races, that is the enemy to the American
public whenever it can be.
What are these people screaming about? This is mostly just a typical
government job description and contract seeking stuff, boring, and
all it shows is they expect something major enough to get ready.
This seems silly to me. The Constitution specifies action against
sedition and public disorder. What is the problem? (The problem
in part is that these people don't read the Constitution that carefully,
and don't want anyone telling them what to do, and guess what,
most of what some object to like taxes and driver's licenses and
stuff like that, is what they would eventually have to get around to
doing, should they create or get the chaos they want and install
themselves in power, and then have to reinvent the wheel, after
enough deaths on the road and from disease and whatnot, situations
that brought these laws on in the first place, and enough people
notice the pro active safety laws in the Bible that validate safety
laws and certification of competence to operate vehicles, use
weapons, etc.
Justina
real-agenda that supposedly shows how FEMA is going to classify
the American public as the enemy, and I don't see any sign of this sort
of thing. Keeping order in a disaster situation is not treating the
American public as the enemy, except that segment that consists of
individuals and gangs of all races, that is the enemy to the American
public whenever it can be.
What are these people screaming about? This is mostly just a typical
government job description and contract seeking stuff, boring, and
all it shows is they expect something major enough to get ready.
This seems silly to me. The Constitution specifies action against
sedition and public disorder. What is the problem? (The problem
in part is that these people don't read the Constitution that carefully,
and don't want anyone telling them what to do, and guess what,
most of what some object to like taxes and driver's licenses and
stuff like that, is what they would eventually have to get around to
doing, should they create or get the chaos they want and install
themselves in power, and then have to reinvent the wheel, after
enough deaths on the road and from disease and whatnot, situations
that brought these laws on in the first place, and enough people
notice the pro active safety laws in the Bible that validate safety
laws and certification of competence to operate vehicles, use
weapons, etc.
Justina
Merry Christmas and a safe and Godly New Year
Here is a link to the Encyclical of Greek Orthodox Archdiocese
of America Archbishop Demetrios for the Feast of the Nativity
of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
This Guy Says It Very Well
(from comments on Constance Cumbey's blog.)
Maybe in calling for financial regulation I *have* contradicted what you call a tenet of the republican rightwing gospel. But I'm not a Republican - I'm British. I am aware that I have more in common with the Right than the Left, but I try to think by biblical categories that are 10 times older than notions of Left and Right.
Mosaic Law had free markets in goods but regulated markets in labour, money and land/property. A man was guaranteed food if he worked (ie, works his land) but there was no social security system - although charity was regarded as a duty.
God is wiser than man, so how much of that can we replicate today? Unless we de-industrialise, dissolve property ownership and and share all land out equitably (which I am not advocating) then we cannot get back to a system whereby a man is guaranteed food for work AND there is no social security system. It's one or the other. Which way to go is the Right/Left dilemma of our time.
But there is no reason not to have God's way, of free markets in goods and regulated markets in money. That is why I said what I did. http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11772087&postID=4058748648854562139
Maybe in calling for financial regulation I *have* contradicted what you call a tenet of the republican rightwing gospel. But I'm not a Republican - I'm British. I am aware that I have more in common with the Right than the Left, but I try to think by biblical categories that are 10 times older than notions of Left and Right.
Mosaic Law had free markets in goods but regulated markets in labour, money and land/property. A man was guaranteed food if he worked (ie, works his land) but there was no social security system - although charity was regarded as a duty.
God is wiser than man, so how much of that can we replicate today? Unless we de-industrialise, dissolve property ownership and and share all land out equitably (which I am not advocating) then we cannot get back to a system whereby a man is guaranteed food for work AND there is no social security system. It's one or the other. Which way to go is the Right/Left dilemma of our time.
But there is no reason not to have God's way, of free markets in goods and regulated markets in money. That is why I said what I did. http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11772087&postID=4058748648854562139
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Crust upheaval and rupture the cause of the Japanese Tsunami
San Francisco - The March 2011 megaquake off the coast of Japan opened up fissures as wide as 6 feet (3 meters) in the seafloor, a new study finds.
.........
On a previous seafloor survey in 2006, the seafloor was covered by sediment, with many sea anemone thriving. No fissures were observed.
On a previous seafloor survey in 2006, the seafloor was covered by sediment, with many sea anemone thriving. No fissures were observed.
Approximately 10,500-to-17,500-feet (3,200-to-5,350-meters) below the ocean's surface, the researchers saw open fissures in "many places," Tsuji said. They ranged from around 3-to-6-feet (around 1-to-3-meters) across, though the researchers couldn't measure how deep these new cracks extended.
By combining their direct observations with seismic surveys of the seafloor, the researchers uncovered a series of complex faults around the zone where the continental crust off the coast of Japan is being forced under the Pacific tectonic plate. They found when the crust ruptured some 12 miles (20 km) below the planet's surface, it was powerful enough to rip all the way to the surface.
That rupture pushed up a massive amount of seafloor, which in turn triggered the huge tsunami that devastated the coast.
Meanwhile, the wedge of crust where the quake struck was not only thrust outward, but extended horizontally like an accordion, Tsuji reported. That explains the fissures, which occurred as the crust got stretched.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm
"The Religious Right claims, and their secular allies in the corporate elite similarly believe, that capitalism is God's ordained economic system for this world - almost as if Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Malthus were Biblical figures on a par with Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Nehemiah, and so forth; and that the system they devised - i.e., capitalism - finds its origins in the Bible and should be adhered to with as much ardor and ebullience as one would adhere to the injunctions of Holy Writ."
http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm
http://www.antipasministries.com/other/article195.htm
Intelligent Design and God Man and ET
At the enterprisemission.com is an article titled as above,
click to read it.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/IntelligentDesignandGod-Man-and-ET.htm
This is essentially the position of Lloyd Pye's Intervention Theory,
http://www.lloydpye.com/ and to sum it up, we are the product of
experiments by intelligent life from elsewhere.
Now, granted, evidence for ID is also evidence for IT (Intervention
Theory in any of its forms).
But that ignores an important thing. Where did ET come from?
Even if you argue that the creation of mankind on the sixth day
is stated so singly from the rest of it, instead of starting it with
God saying life incl. something made in His image and likeness
should come out of the ground, but instead He does that and
then makes a special move with mankind, that this is a telescoping
of events in which He used ET to make us, even IF you argue
that, or, that whatever the original human was it is now altered
by the ET intervention, perhaps part of the curse on Eve played
out perhaps not in her life but later, that birthing would be
more difficult, so the larger head is part of that, and oops, the
(maybe marsupial) greyskins decided they wanted us to look
large headed like them somewhat, was something God allowed
as part of this curse,
even IF you argue all this, you still have no solution to the
origin of life itself, let alone nonsentient matter throughout
the universe.
So its back to God. meanwhile, the interesting stuff these
intervention theorists find should not be ignored or
condemned, but fit it into the creationist model, whether
young earth, old earth, or midrange earth.
Justina
click to read it.
http://www.enterprisemission.com/IntelligentDesignandGod-Man-and-ET.htm
This is essentially the position of Lloyd Pye's Intervention Theory,
http://www.lloydpye.com/ and to sum it up, we are the product of
experiments by intelligent life from elsewhere.
Now, granted, evidence for ID is also evidence for IT (Intervention
Theory in any of its forms).
But that ignores an important thing. Where did ET come from?
Even if you argue that the creation of mankind on the sixth day
is stated so singly from the rest of it, instead of starting it with
God saying life incl. something made in His image and likeness
should come out of the ground, but instead He does that and
then makes a special move with mankind, that this is a telescoping
of events in which He used ET to make us, even IF you argue
that, or, that whatever the original human was it is now altered
by the ET intervention, perhaps part of the curse on Eve played
out perhaps not in her life but later, that birthing would be
more difficult, so the larger head is part of that, and oops, the
(maybe marsupial) greyskins decided they wanted us to look
large headed like them somewhat, was something God allowed
as part of this curse,
even IF you argue all this, you still have no solution to the
origin of life itself, let alone nonsentient matter throughout
the universe.
So its back to God. meanwhile, the interesting stuff these
intervention theorists find should not be ignored or
condemned, but fit it into the creationist model, whether
young earth, old earth, or midrange earth.
Justina
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)