"
Plenty of Jewish people don't rule the World. The vast majority don't. In fact since the elite are a tiny number of people, very good at syphoning off wealth and concentrating it in their familie's hands, they'd always have to be easily identifiable as from one culture or another and they were never going to be a representative sample of anything as large as a cultural group.
They are so stinking rich they don't live lives like anyone else including other Jewish people. They may happen to be Jewish (I don't know or care) but what's more distinctive about them is that they are greedy even to the point they will ruin the source of their wealth which is everyone else. It becomes pointless to categorise them as Jewish in that sense even if they are.
Really rich people mix with each other and nobody else. They don't belong to the culture they came from originally. They'll extract anyone else's wealth, Jewish people's, black people's, white people's etc.. What do they care where it comes from? If they did they'd have to have less and there's no sign I can see they're interested in that scenario.
We've got a lot more in common with anyone in the more than 99 per cent of people who aren't in the elite and more shared interests with them than the elites share with the cultural groups they emerged from.
The race/cultural labels can become a distraction that elites benefit from while people misidentify them as part of a larger group. The larger group becomes a target while they are safely tucked away somewhere living it up, suffering no consequences for their avarice.
The real divide is between the super rich elites and everybody else. If we keep referring to them as belonging to any other group I think we're obscurring our vision of the pertinent facts.
What do you think?"
I think this is very succinct and correct.
Hello Christine, please come back to cumbey.blogspot.com ... some of us *not the bullies* miss you and your invigorating posts. Don't let them win, don't let them silence you.
ReplyDeletethank you, I am limited by Constance to one post a week, probably because I haven't been able to ignore those bullies and their responses to my response just floods the blog.
Deleteperhaps you could post this concern over there, ask her to allow me two posts a week?
No way, Jose! Anon 12:25... you can't be serious! Noone wants that mad old sasquatch back over at cumbey.blogspot!
ReplyDeleteStay put bigfoot! I'm not sure who's the nuttiest and most New Agey of the two... you or Thomas Dahlheimer.
if you think I am new agey then you don't understand the new age. dismissing something for example ether and energy flows and psychic vampirism as nonexistent is like saying the moon doesn't exist because some worship it.
Deleteneither Constance nor any of the posters know what they are talking about in calling me gnostic. Gnosticism is one thing and one thing only: denial that the creator of the universe is the most high, dismissal of the material universal as inherently evil, and some mumbo jumbo to get you to the most high when you die and not get caught by lower entities.
New age is a mish mash hybrid of gnostic trends politics, occultism distinct from Gnosticism and some pragmatic issues hijacked. Gnostics had n0o political agenda, New Age definitely does.
anon 12:25 apparently was not some setup and the same as the counter post (I answered truthfully per it being an honest post in case it was but I've had at least one cruel joke played on me by the crew at Constance's) and has made the request at Constance's blog for me to get 2 posts a week. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteOf course the following self righteous post was made in response by some nasty anonymous: "No correction on her part for past real indiscretions then? No apology to the blog host as well as her readers? She needs to at least be ready to apologize. And that should be wholesale, without her comebacks of unending blameshaming."
I don't oe any of you "rough crew" as someone at Constance's described you any apologies. you owe me and Constance an apology. you think that anything you say, including flat out lies is okay and the proper resonse to you is to knuckle under. you got another think coming. And one of you I know the address as I posted there a while back that I know it, and where to serve papers for slander if I decide to do so, though I don't want to make the out of state trip to sue in court. So I probably won't.
from Constance's blog "I'm the poster who suggested a little more leaway for her. Having looked back over the blog history, even her recent posts are cluttered with the bizarre and her unrelenting bullying of the poster "Physicist" shows me she's noone to blame for her predicament but herself."
ReplyDeleteinteresting. given the poster talked about my "invigorating posts" I guess this was a setup. such a remark about my history is inconsistent with ignorance of the material the poster now claims to have reviewed.
ReplyDelete"bizarre" - the bizarre is getting more commonplace forewarned and prepared of mind is best. Some police forensics thing was discussing how to deal with DNA that is not entirely human, not entirely animal in future. why?
because DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency who gave us the Internet and other things) is working on developing genetic editing to change a human to something that can do without food and water for over a week and be in fighting shape when he meets the enemy, jump higher run faster than normal, and regrow limbs. they aren't yelling animal DNA but you can't do all that without it.
The alien abduction thing is a matter of concern with a lot of Christians and dismissing the entire thing as illusion because of some instances where someone may have been yanked out of their bodies and observers saw no leaving physically, is not helpful.
illusions don't get you pregnant, leave implanted devices that broadcast in the gigaherz range or leave handprints on your body or walls of your house that fluoresce in some UV frequency. Sure there's a demonic component but that's not all there is to it.
"unrelenting bullying of the poster "Physicist"" yeah, well, like I said, he played his little shift ground game and if she or he doesn't see that I hate to see what happens when others do this to her or him in a more serious situation with higher stakes. Or maybe this was just a setup to joke with me and to joke with Constance's blog, stir the scene up since there wasn't enough interesting sniping going on. Boring without me to yell at.
We are all of one blood because all descended from Adam. including hybrids if any. CRISPR is a gene editing program that can produce some interesting results so far harmless but it can do to a human what the GMO soy, corn, etc. operation was done to a plant to get what the health people are worried about.
so you better figure out now, are you going to count these as human and savable and not proper objects of extermination aka murder? or just go ahead and kill one if you meet it, and, uh, it will be mostly human looking so you will probably have legal trouble.
gene editing can be done at any age, to the DNA in sperm and egg before joining them, to the embryo stage, to the fetal stage, to a child, a teen or an adult.
The notion that changes to our DNA by CERN or whatever (a bizzare worry expressed by someone at Constance's blog which brought on my remarks in the past several months) a. could happen (ridiculous) b. would make us unsavable, or perhaps does that mean loss of salvation for some Christian to who this happens (ridiculous, after all you are still descended from Adam aside from the fact that animal DNA added on is not going to render you irrelevant since they too have a relationship with God as shown in some Bible verses, and synthetic DNA (been done) is not anything worse than synthetic arms or synthetic heart valves.
of one blood does not mean uniform identity. just look at all of us humans. that is not uniform identical.
if you doubt all this, search goats "spider genes" for what has beend done so far. the goats look like normal goats. the milk produces spider silk proteins that are harvested to make spider silk for industrial purposes. if it can be done to them it can be done to us.
in case the perp here decides to delete comments to remove proof, I am reposting the whole thing here.
ReplyDeleteAnonymousJanuary 21, 2017 at 12:25 PM
Hello Christine, please come back to cumbey.blogspot.com ... some of us *not the bullies* miss you and your invigorating posts. Don't let them win, don't let them silence you.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Christine Erikson (aka Justina)January 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM
thank you, I am limited by Constance to one post a week, probably because I haven't been able to ignore those bullies and their responses to my response just floods the blog.
perhaps you could post this concern over there, ask her to allow me two posts a week?
Delete
Reply
AnonymousJanuary 21, 2017 at 4:46 PM
No way, Jose! Anon 12:25... you can't be serious! Noone wants that mad old sasquatch back over at cumbey.blogspot!
Stay put bigfoot! I'm not sure who's the nuttiest and most New Agey of the two... you or Thomas Dahlheimer.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Christine Erikson (aka Justina)January 25, 2017 at 7:53 PM
if you think I am new agey then you don't understand the new age. dismissing something for example ether and energy flows and psychic vampirism as nonexistent is like saying the moon doesn't exist because some worship it.
neither Constance nor any of the posters know what they are talking about in calling me gnostic. Gnosticism is one thing and one thing only: denial that the creator of the universe is the most high, dismissal of the material universal as inherently evil, and some mumbo jumbo to get you to the most high when you die and not get caught by lower entities.
New age is a mish mash hybrid of gnostic trends politics, occultism distinct from Gnosticism and some pragmatic issues hijacked. Gnostics had n0o political agenda, New Age definitely does.
Delete
ReplyDeleteReply
Christine Erikson (aka Justina)January 30, 2017 at 8:25 AM
anon 12:25 apparently was not some setup and the same as the counter post (I answered truthfully per it being an honest post in case it was but I've had at least one cruel joke played on me by the crew at Constance's) and has made the request at Constance's blog for me to get 2 posts a week. Thank you.
Of course the following self righteous post was made in response by some nasty anonymous: "No correction on her part for past real indiscretions then? No apology to the blog host as well as her readers? She needs to at least be ready to apologize. And that should be wholesale, without her comebacks of unending blameshaming."
I don't oe any of you "rough crew" as someone at Constance's described you any apologies. you owe me and Constance an apology. you think that anything you say, including flat out lies is okay and the proper resonse to you is to knuckle under. you got another think coming. And one of you I know the address as I posted there a while back that I know it, and where to serve papers for slander if I decide to do so, though I don't want to make the out of state trip to sue in court. So I probably won't.
ReplyDelete
Christine Erikson (aka Justina)January 30, 2017 at 4:37 PM
from Constance's blog "I'm the poster who suggested a little more leaway for her. Having looked back over the blog history, even her recent posts are cluttered with the bizarre and her unrelenting bullying of the poster "Physicist" shows me she's noone to blame for her predicament but herself."
ReplyDelete
Christine Erikson (aka Justina)January 30, 2017 at 4:57 PM
interesting. given the poster talked about my "invigorating posts" I guess this was a setup. such a remark about my history is inconsistent with ignorance of the material the poster now claims to have reviewed.
"bizarre" - the bizarre is getting more commonplace forewarned and prepared of mind is best. Some police forensics thing was discussing how to deal with DNA that is not entirely human, not entirely animal in future. why?
because DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency who gave us the Internet and other things) is working on developing genetic editing to change a human to something that can do without food and water for over a week and be in fighting shape when he meets the enemy, jump higher run faster than normal, and regrow limbs. they aren't yelling animal DNA but you can't do all that without it.
The alien abduction thing is a matter of concern with a lot of Christians and dismissing the entire thing as illusion because of some instances where someone may have been yanked out of their bodies and observers saw no leaving physically, is not helpful.
ReplyDeleteillusions don't get you pregnant, leave implanted devices that broadcast in the gigaherz range or leave handprints on your body or walls of your house that fluoresce in some UV frequency. Sure there's a demonic component but that's not all there is to it.
"unrelenting bullying of the poster "Physicist"" yeah, well, like I said, he played his little shift ground game and if she or he doesn't see that I hate to see what happens when others do this to her or him in a more serious situation with higher stakes. Or maybe this was just a setup to joke with me and to joke with Constance's blog, stir the scene up since there wasn't enough interesting sniping going on. Boring without me to yell at.
We are all of one blood because all descended from Adam. including hybrids if any. CRISPR is a gene editing program that can produce some interesting results so far harmless but it can do to a human what the GMO soy, corn, etc. operation was done to a plant to get what the health people are worried about.
so you better figure out now, are you going to count these as human and savable and not proper objects of extermination aka murder? or just go ahead and kill one if you meet it, and, uh, it will be mostly human looking so you will probably have legal trouble.
gene editing can be done at any age, to the DNA in sperm and egg before joining them, to the embryo stage, to the fetal stage, to a child, a teen or an adult.
The notion that changes to our DNA by CERN or whatever (a bizzare worry expressed by someone at Constance's blog which brought on my remarks in the past several months) a. could happen (ridiculous) b. would make us unsavable, or perhaps does that mean loss of salvation for some Christian to who this happens (ridiculous, after all you are still descended from Adam aside from the fact that animal DNA added on is not going to render you irrelevant since they too have a relationship with God as shown in some Bible verses, and synthetic DNA (been done) is not anything worse than synthetic arms or synthetic heart valves.
of one blood does not mean uniform identity. just look at all of us humans. that is not uniform identical.
if you doubt all this, search goats "spider genes" for what has beend done so far. the goats look like normal goats. the milk produces spider silk proteins that are harvested to make spider silk for industrial purposes. if it can be done to them it can be done to us.