Friday, April 29, 2011

John Judge on 9-11

John Judge is a respected conspiracy researcher, one of the "Brussel Sprouts," students of
Mae Brussel who first alerted the world to the peculiar relationships surrounding the
Kennedy Assassination. Peter Dale Scott's deep politics concept and many others we know
today, owe a lot to her.

Mr. Judge was slandered and reviled by Dave Emory, when it became evident that Judge,
not Emory, would inherit and manage Ms. Brussel's files and the planned museum in Santa
Cruz, after her death. Thanks to the sore loser Emory, that project failed. I maintain a link
to Emory's information and sources because they are mostly useful, but I don't endorse
his policies for lack of a better word. Unfortunately, the 9-11 cover-upper hijacked
9-11 truther movement, seems to have gotten credibility with her sprouts over at the
Mae Brussel web site, since the absurd (Rumsfeld originated) effort to deny any planes
hit the towers is over there. Supposed analysis of videos showing fraud, etc. if any
fraud exists, it is in the doctoring of videos to make them look phony. I SAW the
second plane hit, live feed on TV when it happened.

here is a critical part of his report on the 9-11 WTC and Pentagon attack.

"Second, I was convinced I had lost a dear friend and fellow assassination researcher that day, who was a regular flight attendant on Flight 77 from Dulles to LAX. Thankfully, she was home with her ailing father and was not killed. She was taken with other ground crew and attendants who worked that route to see the damage at the Pentagon, and she recognized parts of the plane she had flown so often.
There was rubble and remains despite your claims. She was shown autopsy photos of her fellow crew members, including the severed arm of her best friend at work, which she recognized from the bracelet she wore.
Third, others who expound on this idea that the plane did too little damage to the building may not realize that the fuel is in the wings, and that they disintegrated on contact, while spreading the fireball that burned the fuel, the building and the plane. They may not recall that part of the purpose of rebuilding that side of the Pentagon, which they had been doing quite visibly for almost 4 years, was to reinforce it against just such an attack, and there is a clearly visible difference in the level of destruction done on either side of that reinforced section."

No comments:

Post a Comment