Monday, May 8, 2017

the Islamic Antichrist Debunked

8 comments:

  1. Plenty of information exposing Shoebat here:

    https://sites.google.com/site/jesuitwalidshoebat/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. glancing at this I recognize some issues I already dealt with elsewhere.

      firstly, the Vatican is on a hill OUTSIDE the old and modern Roman city limits. it is not one of the seven hills and there are many many cities that claim to be built on seven hills. USA has at least 12 maybe 20 such. A good case has been made that USA is Babylon the Great another good case has been made that Babylon being a MYSTERY not a clear cut thing, is a moving stronghold, that at various times was settled in various city states, and lately here. Might be elsewhere by the very end. Might not.

      Shoebat started as a jihadi (the claims his claims are provably false fails because of an old newspaper article, describing the bombing that was denied happened.) and he brought the jihadi attitude into Christianity when he converted. Naturally this can be complicating.

      Theodore or Ted Shoebat is an excellent analyst of current events in light of history which often repeats itself. I recommend their site for this. However, though he is correct that the anti jihad movement is heavily compromised by Nazis and homosexuals and eugenicists, and that the refugee problem was partly created by Merkel and co. to make the far right more palatable, the fact is that these are the only people equipped and prepared to deal with a street fighting situation that the jihadis will create sooner or later. The problem is, to keep them from gaining permanent power and get rid of them once they solve the problem created to exalt them.

      Shoebat & Co is a mixed bag of tricks. Walid (I don't recall if I noticed Ted do this) frequently misquotes Scripture either applying it to some place or person it isn't about, or flat out misquote that isn't matched in any Roman Catholic or protestant version I can find. Such as the Malachi prophecy about a pure grain offering and incense being offered from the rising to the setting of the sun to YHWH and His Name being exalted.

      The prophecy doesn't say pure grain or grain just a pure offering, which in post exilic times tended to refer to the grain offering but included blood offerings.

      HOWEVER NONE OF THIS COULD BE DONE EXCEPT AT THE TEMPLE. So how could it be done in many lands?

      Shoebat is correct that only the Apostolic Churches those that I call "liturgical" with an Apostolic Succession offer incense to God.

      THEREFORE THIS PROPHECY DOES REFER TO THE ROMAN CATHOLIC AND EASTERN ORTHODOX WORSHIP, perhaps even to that of the semi heretical non Chalcedonian type Orthodox (because Trinitarian not arian or similar)
      churches also. in fact, you'd need them in some places to fit this picture.

      Delete
  2. In several places the Bible (which focusses more on the morals and theology which is more important to God than the liturgics, and treats more of the former and takes the latter for granted, rarely mentioning it) does make hints that go AGAINST the anti RC hysteria of protestants (which I used to share decades ago before I read the Bible straight through in a few months and did this three times, also got to know the writings of the second century fathers).

    Shoebat in his over excitement makes some of his arguments look flawed when other verses do support them.

    Now as for only masonic presidents are the best I don't know. maybe he's learned better. But the idea that the antichrist is a moslem or has a moslem background is seriously flawed, because it is written that he will not honor the gods PLURAL of his fathers but a strange god of fortresses a militaristic and perhaps technology and occult forces promoting false god. and present himself as god.

    While a pagan might become a moslem (thus not honoring his fathers' gods) he would have to have gotten into something else by the time he becomes the antichrist.

    Another BIG problem is that all t he interpreters miss something about Daniel chapter 7 which I detail in http://seventhchapterofdaniel.blogspot.com start from the earliest post.

    The bulk of the complaints prots have against Rome are about things with a biblical basis and often involve misunderstanding (not helped when badly trained priests believe the same things like that Christ is sacrificed anew on the altar, which is not the case).

    The Two Babylons by Hislop was first believed in then after fact checking rejected by Woodward who wrote The Babylon Connection? showing most of it is dead wrong and towards the end of the book listing page after page of practices religious and otherwise known among pagans, shown in the Bible as among the Israelites, and either ordered by God Himself or not condemned by Him!

    A lot of pagan practices were stolen from the True Faith when it was in practice in Seth's time and later, before paganism eclipsed it.

    Walid descended to the depths of vile falsehood and slander when he got tired of my correcting him and this despite admitting I was right that a verse he applied to Jesus Christ was about John the Baptist.

    recently he claimed I had mocked the Incarnation and said Christ descended from a lineage from Onan's spilled seed. I NEVER SAID ANYTHING REMOTELY RESEMBLING THIS. I said a betulah (hymen intact) virgin could get pregnant without a miracle, from an oops spill from petting to orgasm, but an almah translated young woman has according to Strong's Concordance implications of isolation, propriety even veiling that would mean no such activity took place, like the apparent redundancy about Rebekah in Genesis, that she was a virgin (betulah) AND no man had known her, actually two distinct issues. Walid assumes Rabbi Akiva changed betulah to almah in the Masoretic text, but we don't have the Hebrew original that the Septuagint, which translated whatever word there as virgin, to know which was there. as it is, changed or not, the implications of the miraculous are even more extreme than with betulah.

    Walid is a bit of a prima donna. I have more respect for his son.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the past, you've cast wild aspersions on Dan Brian having promoted re-incarnation here yet you have never supplied one shred of evidence to prove your accusations, which you made at Constance Cumbey's blog. Why is that? Can you substantiate your claims there or was it a poor attempt at deflecting the blame for being New Agey?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have substantiated those claims about his claiming reincarnation by reposting direct quotes from him.

      I am not New Agey. you might as well claim believing the moon exists is pagan since pagans have worshipped it. There is a strong correlation between acupuncture meridians and the lymph system and for all I know you are witch who is not just the fluff bunny wicca type but dead serious and is afraid I will teach Christians what to spot and where some dangers are and how to deal with them.

      you are a definite liar if nothing else, since I posted his comments from one of my blogs and outted him at Constance's blog. The link to his quote is there. http://fightthenewage.blogspot.com/2016/01/reincarnation.html?showComment=1452190871774#c5916483164132572274

      highlight copy paste you will see Dan erased all his comments BUT THAT MY COMMENTS ARE OBVIOUSLY ARGUING AGAINST REINCARNATION, TO SOMEONE SUPPORTING IT, AND THAT SOMEONE IS DAN BRYAN.

      http://politicallyunclassifiable.blogspot.com/search?q=reincarnation

      http://politicallyunclassifiable.blogspot.com/2016/02/dan-bryan-httpdbreflections.html

      YOU CAN SEE FROM ARCHIVED COMMENTS OF HIS HE FAILED TO DELETE IN TIME, THAT HE DENIES THE TRINITY, HAS AN ARIANIST VIEW OF CHRIST AND THINKS ELIJAH REINCARNATED AS JOHN THE BAPTIST.

      Delete
  4. Constance is mighty angry with you now for rambling on so much with hoggy posts. You don't come back real soon now, ya hear,?

    No need to reply here... I won't be back... just thought I'd let ya know.

    Bye now!

    ReplyDelete
  5. just so everyone here knows, I read her blog every few days or more. I noticed her remark about my post being rambling and above her pay grade. as for length, if I am limited to one post a week (because of propensity to argue back to my detractors who are dishonest, venomous and vile and frankly I am disappointed in her for not dealing more sharply with them than she did though she often in earlier years told them to just ignore me if they didn't like what I said) then I can't make separate posts on separate subjects can I? I have supplied a few research and relevant to her post type remarks in most posts as well as the theology and so forth arguments. http://cumbey.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Never before has such a complete refutation of the Islamic Antichrist theory been in print. Chris White critiques all the major arguments from Islamic Antichrist proponents such as Joel Richardson and Walid Shoebat in a respectful but poignant way. He uses sound methods of biblical interpretation to show that the Islamic Antichrist theory is seriously flawed. This book refutes all the major arguments for the Islamic Antichrist theory and reveals new discoveries about the origins of Islamic end times beliefs which call into question claims of Islamic Antichrist theorists concerning the supposed similarities of figures like The Mahdi and the Antichrist, Isa and the False Prophet, and the Dajjal and Jesus. You will never see the Islamic Antichrist theory the same way again. Topics Covered in the book: The Islamic Empire being in view in the legs of the statue of Daniel 2 and the last beast of Daniel 7 The “people of the prince” in Daniel 9 referring to Muslims The “Assyrian” In Isaiah and Micah Types of Antichrist Mystery Babylon being Saudi Arabia The Mark of the Beast being Arabic letters instead of numbers The 7th head of Revelation 17 being the Islamic Empire Gog as the Antichrist Various refutations of the theories concerning the Islamic Mahdi being the same as the Antichrist And much more.





    Goldenslot สล็อต
    goldenslot mobile

    ReplyDelete