9-11 a coverup that facilitated more wars

A MUST READ Thatcher the ruiner of British economy

http://tarpley.net/2013/04/24/thatcher-milk-snatcher-and-the-decline-of-the-west/

considering that economist Hayek was a creature of Rockefeller and
Thatcher a creature of Rothschild, new world order types, clearly
this laissez faire economics stuff must be of use in destroying
freedom it pretends to support. create chaos and make a new totalitarian
world order out of it.

H.P. Lovecraft likely original source of ancient alien ideas

Antony C. Sutton: NWO Wall Street financed Nazis 1920s+30s & Communists

Recorded Interview With Col. L. Fletcher Prouty

dangerous new GMO wheat

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gm-wheat-may-damage-human-genetics-permanently

this stuff makes a chemical that turns off some
genes in the wheat, which are a match to some
human genes, that if turned off could result in
bad trouble for the next generation (and maybe
the original generation) of regular eaters of
this stuff. new out of Australia, probably not
in the stores anywhere yet. I would recommend
starting campaigns against it. Read the article.

more debunking of ancient aliens

don't let the New Age and related stuff get you down.

a lot of people have a bad habit of buying bad philosophy if some history or archaeology or technology connected to it turns out to be real. THAT has to be countered.

Just because a lot of science has its origins in alchemy doesn't mean you have to go pursue alchemy, and just because there may indeed be a human aura and energy system does NOT make you a god. 

If there is some paraphysical substratum to the whole creation, that does not make it the Creator. 

This is the distinction that has to be made in dealing with New Agers (used to be called metaphysical philosophy or something like that).

If one can bilocate out of one's body that does not prove reincarnation only that something exists that is more than physical about us, duh, like The Bible says.

If some aliens turn out to be physical that doesn't mean they aren't themselves deceived by false teachings especially since
a. if they originated as pre Flood mad scientist projects of genetic reengineering of humans for extreme environments off world, then they reflect pre Flood culture which was evil, and b. if the ancient east Indians got offworld then they reflect that kind of philosophy which is back of the New Age anyway. And c. if the "nordics" and "pleiadeans" are just Nazis third generation, well, you can expect the usual metaphysical nonsense.

d. if there is a breakaway civilization like Richard Dolan speculates (on good grounds) about, it is part of this military industrial nazi and illuminated elitism stuff so also evil. 

It has been observed that the only religion aliens go out of their way to contradict is Christianity. They may or may not be all demons, or some demons, or physical with or without demon partners. But they know that something in Christianity, when the Christian is serious not nominal, is bad for their boundary violation mental games whether done by demons or demon empowered telepaths or trained telepaths.

Nothing you find out there should shake your faith, but somehow, whether it is evolution or wierd physics or alternative history for some people this rewrites everything.

And, should it turn out that a day with The Lord is as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day, and that therefore it is a thousand years to go before The Second Coming when things start to get tectonically and extreme weather and asteroid impact active, well, no reason to sweat that either.

Just don't expect to get raptured out of the way. We are not appointed to the wrath of God, but that has nothing to do with whether we will face the unrighteous wrath of the devil or not. That has happened lots of times in the past and in some parts of the world is going on now. The whole pretrib rapture deception is based on precisely this confusion.

this is a good debunking of this nephilim nonsense.

http://www.herescope.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-nephilim.html

Justina

Origenism Plague of The Eastern Orthodox Church

Today is the Third Saturday in Lent, leading up to
Julian date Pascha aka "Easter." The Revised Julian
Calendar aka New Calendar celebrates Pascha on
the Julian Calendar, ergo Lent leading up to this
is not the same schedule as western Lent.

And today is memorialized St. Euthychius Patriarch
of Constantinople. Seems he was banished for a
time due to the scheming of the Origenists, but was
restored. Born c. AD 512 died AD 582.

Orthodox Wiki trying to keep the emperor Justinian,
revered as a saint, from any smear, claims that the
latter's acceptance of apthartodocetism is a lie and
his decree in its favor not to be found, only mentioned
in a history, but it seems that St. Euthychius was
arrested Jan.22 AD 565 because of his opposition to
the emperor's support of this heresy.

this heresy held "that Jesus Christ was imperishable and 
was not able to suffer while dying on the Cross,"
http://orthodoxwiki.org/Eutychius_of_Constantinople

This was originated by the Monophysite Bishop Julian
of Halicarnassus, and opposed by the Monophysite
Severus on the basis that our redemption was not
effected on the Cross if Jesus Christ's Incarnation was
not fully human.

"Toward the end of his life, Eutychius maintained an opinion 
that after the resurrection the body will be "more subtle than air" 
and no longer a tangible thing.^[3] This was considered heretical, 
because it was taken as a denial of the doctrine of physical, 
corporeal resurrection. The future Pope Gregory the Great, 
then residing at Constantinople as Apocrisiarius, opposed this 
opinion, citing Luke 24:39. Emperor Tiberius talked to the 
disputants separately, and tried to reconcile them, but the 
breach was persistent.^[3]

Eutychius died quietly on the Sunday after Easter, at the age 

of 70. Some of his friends later told Pope Gregory that a few 

minutes before his death he touched the skin of his hand and 

said, "I confess that in this flesh we shall rise again",^[7] 

(a rough quote of Job 19:26)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch_Eutychius_of_Constantinople

late beliefs and death.

While St. Eutychius opposed Origenism in its

forms condemned in the Fifth Ecumenical Council,

variant ideas that are totally compatible with 

Origenism were also around. The most obvious

stuff was that the fall of various spirits and even

the heavenly bodies from contemplating God

led to their either in the case of spirits incarnating

as humans or other things, and in the case of

the heavenly bodies becoming physical.

Another Origenistic doctrine was the apokatastasis

or restoration of all things, in modern protestant

terms when condemning this sort of thinking, 

universalism or universal salvation of all, even of

the demons and of the devil himself. (Origen 

protested he didn't go that far as claiming the devil

would be saved eventually, but already this idea 

was being promulgated as part of his kind of 

thinking in his time or he wouldn't have been 

accused of it, some of his students must have 

taken this next step.)

Unfortunately, the excess of allegorization that

led to all this, and could take Scripture that 

opposed something and argue it supported it,

was not condemned.

Though the idea that Adam and Eve did not have

the dense physical bodies we have now until 

after the fall is not mentioned, this is obviously

the same kind of thing as saying the heavenly

bodies were not densely physical until they, as

supposedly conscious or semi conscious beings,

abandoned contemplation of God and fell and

became physical. And of course the preexistence

of souls, whose various degrees of sin prior to

incarnation dictate what kind of bodies they will

get.

some argue that the condemnations against 

Origen were not part of the Fifth Ecumenical 

Council, but there is also evidence of some 

tampering with its record, and besides these could

have been signed off on by the assembly before

its formal opening.

Now, the error that St. Eutychius opposed, is

that of claiming that Jesus' human nature including

even His Body, was prelapsarian to the point of 

being incorruptible, unable to suffer, unable to be

killed. This presupposes that Adam's was also,

by his created nature not by some grace that 

protected him, not to mention access to The Tree 

of Life. Even after The Fall he would have

continued immortal if not removed from access to

it, hence the expulsion from Eden.

Origen had tremendous influence on The Holy 

Fathers, especially The Cappadocians and St. John

Chrysostom so various notions either explicitly 

condemned later, or just compatible with them, 

have tended to continue within Orthodoxy when they

should not have done so. 

Nowdays the patristic consciousness scene, and

Fr. Seraphim Rose' unquestioning acceptance of

their writings as practically continuation of Scripture,

has caused these ideas to come into focus. Including

notions like the heretical idea St. Eutychius entertained

for a while, but rejected on his dead bed, that our

resurrected bodies would be more intangible than air.

(If so why bother to resurrect us? this condition 

described is that of the spirits of the dead anyway!

Indeed, this could hardly be called a resurrection, 

except perhaps in the sense of better access to the

physical world, but supposedly that is going to become

intangible also. Sounds like destruction rather than 

renewal.)

what I notice about Orthodox writers is, that the farther

back we go in time, the more they sound protestant,

in that they constantly harp on the Scriptures peppering

their homilies with Scripture cite after Scripture cite. 

This is aside from the issue of whether the application

is always correct, though it seems to be mostly 

correct.

The point is, if we are going to focus on and imitate

The Holy Fathers, what then do they do? They do NOT

refer to each other's writings as Scripture, like St. Peter

referred to St. Paul's writings by referring to them "and

the rest of the Scriptures."

They constantly go to The Bible. St. Cyril of Jerusalem

in his Catechetical Lectures even told his catechumens

to go to The Scriptures, and check everything he taught

them and if there was conflict with the Scriptures, reject

what he was teaching them that was in conflict with 

The Scriptures.

So what do The Scriptures say? God created things

needing to eat food, and provided food for them. God

put coats of skins, the term used being for a tunic, 

on Adam and Eve who were already naked not clothed

in glory and their bodies invisible, that notion was 

read into The Scripture, and not ashamed, and having

fallen had become ashamed. These skins are much 

more reasonably and Scripture consistently understood

by some as the skins of the first animals used for 

sacrifice, certainly Cain and Abel were bringing 

sacrifices the first generation after the Fall.

And Jesus' Resurrected Body, though capable of 

remarkable things, was densely physical with flesh

and bones as He said, "handle Me and see, that I

have flesh and bones, not like a spirit." Those who

have touched ectoplasmic semi solid spirits have

reported a feel rather different than that of a normal

human being. That some might rarely be able to 

get solid enough to give a hug during a deceptive

meeting when a woman hugged her dead son 

conjured up by a medium, only to find later he was

not killed in action in Viet Nam only missing in action

and came home, is irrelevant, a hug is not like 

feeling the bare hands and arms and face. And it

is momentary. not consistent. Also that might have

been a deception involving a living human that faked

being a spirit.

solid enough to attack and do harm is still not like

having the flesh and bones of a human being.

So we need, as one priest warned, read The Fathers

with caution. 

St. Gregory of Nyssa held to the apokatastasis, which

was later condemned, and his Philokalia of Origen 

incl. all the stuff later condemned. 

And that stuff is unscriptural.

St. Eutychius opposed a heresy that was part of a

larger picture he didn't quite understand, but when

he fell into another part of that picture, rejected it

also.

Justina