The Shocking Truth of Orthodoxy

Starchild Skull

aside from any demonic angle on the aliens, which I think exists, there is also
something very physical. Case in point, this video.

9/11: Money, Motive, Technology, and Plausible Deniability

Chakras, Etheric Body, Auras and Bilocation DO NOT PROVE NEW AGE DOCTRINES OF REINCARNATION, PANTHEISM OR ONENESS OF ALL THINGS OR SELF AS GOD.

so what if there is an etheric reality side of the body, do you not as a Christian believe that something survives after physical death?

If you accept something survives the bodily death just what do you think it is doing BEFORE death, eh?

THERE IS NO LOGICAL CONNECTION - regardless of NAM says - BETWEEN "ASTRAL" BODY ETC. AND NAM DOCTRINES ESPECIALLY PANTHEISM, REINCARNATION, AND SELF AS GOD. 

They have absolutely no relationship to each other. Total non sequitur. 

New Age propaganda is heavily non sequitur. 

just because the sun in the sky exists, does not prove it is divine despite the claims of sun worshippers. 


"Remember your Creator before the silver cord is loosed, or the golden bowl is broken, or the pitcher shattered at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the well. Then the dust will return to the earth as it was, and the spirit will return to God who gave it. (NKJV) Eccl. 12:6-7

http://www.neverthirsty.org/pp/bible-questions/answer00009-what-is-the-silver-cord.html attempts to solve this puzzle by citing possible means of death, head wound, heart as the wheel, etc. but the silver cord as spinal cord? separated meaning taken far away? that is not a spinal severing injury.

http://biblesuite.com/hebrew/1534.htm 

galgal is a wheel, whirling wind, chariot wheels, not a pumping blob.

http://spokensanskrit.de/index.php?tinput=wheel&script=&direction=ES&link=yes 

you can see cakra or chakra is wheel in the same sense, so much so that it is part of the word cakrasanda or wheelchair.

same concept. something round or roundish and usually, or sometimes, or at least potentially, rotating.

The term silver cord in use in out of body research, and the realm they go to is highly deceptive I don't recommend this, originates from that passage in the KJV because that is what the connection to the body looks like to the bilocator. Apparently there are many cords not just one but the overall impression is one, but the connection depends on where you went out from.

JUST HOW DO THESE EXPERIENCES PROVE NAM SELF DEITY or PANTHEISM or REINCARNATION false doctrines?

They don't. they are totally irrelevant.

even the one world politics and the all is one or should be nonsense is NOT supported by chakras or OOBE, but the IRRATIONAL MISEQUATION is used
to lead many from this to a range of lies, nonsense, delusion, and worse.

undercut the supports and call the rest into question.

undercut the supports by showing there IS NO LOGICAL CONNECTION BETWEEN CHAKRAS ETC. and what the NAM step by step or faster tries to lead you into using it.

I posted this to a UFO egroup

This could get complicated. First let's look at what someone said,
I am not sure who originated it, but a friend of mine said this, after
looking at local behavior and history. 

"people do what works until it doesn't work anymore, and then
they do something else."

The gnostics, working from the idea that matter is inherently evil
and the most high God wouldn't have made it, posited someone
higher than YHWH and demoted YHWH to being the demiurge.

Most practical minded people liking to eat and stay alive and
enjoying matter tend to credit the physical world to whoever they
consider is deity or the older deities or a most ancient deity who
is then usually ignored and treated as supplanted by lesser ones.

The Hebrew Christian perspective is that The Most High God made
all things visible and invisible, matter and spirit, and made all things
good, but some changes happened later.

So the pedigree building game of the gnostics, was probably done
back in early times, when the worship of heroes and personifications
and occasional demoniacal manifestations, took the place of the
worship of The Most High God.

So let's look at the near universal legend (I won't say myth because
this sounds like it is totally false, and has at best some subjective
value, which is by definition deceptive). If something horrific occurred
once, and memory faded and various people with axes to grind all
tended to rewrite history somewhat anyway, you could expect to find
a core similarity - Flood, a few escaped in a boat or on a mountain 
which latter would be memory of the Ark having landed- and not much
else between the stories. 

So in those cultures with writing back to nearer that time, who is 
the boat maker and who is his god? those cultures are to be preferred
because once something, however twisted, is in writing, it doesn't 
change especially when you write on clay tablets which are cumbersome.

The question is, Who is the God of Noah? Who warned him?

Let's reframe that question, who is the oldest Noah equivalent? Okay
that's Utnapishtim and Atrahasis. So Who is the God
of Utnapishtim?

The answer is Ea. Now, by the time of the writings at issue, Ea had
all kinds of myths about him and was two or three generations down
from the top dogs, er, gods. But let's assume that was part of the then
NWO game, and not original.

Of particular interest is the Babylonian poem Seven Are They, in
either variations or segments online, but part of it says that the
seven demons or seven categories of demon are friendly to or
work for the "gods" except for one. 

They are afraid of Ea.

Sumerian Enki is equivalent to Ea, but some people who like devils
are using that name as a devil figure so let's leave it out. Both stories
rank the deity that helped the ark maker as lower than other deities.

Surviving languages are almost none of them related to Sumerian,
so we can leave Atrahasis and Enki out and look for similarities elsewhere.

So now we got a deity who helped a man and his familly escape
The Flood, and who is a terror to demons. Is this beginning to sound
familiar?

Ea is equivalent to north semitic Ya and Hebrew YHWH is like The Self
Existent Eternal Creator of all Life (wh being related to hwy life as I
recall). The One WHO IS (as distinct from Plotinus' impersonal one THAT is).

Interestingly, Egypt's earliest god was called A-a. Sounds similar.

Infowolf1

End The Lie program on Zeitgeist Fraud and New Age

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man