vaccine manufacturers admit special dangers of vaccine making subsequent infections worse

Are Common Law Grand Juries Valid and related issues

https://libertyborn.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/are-common-law-grand-juries-valid/

Hillary in bed with China

Chinese Made Vaccines are “Pre-Approved” by the 
World Health Organization (WHO). They Completely 
Bypass Any US Agency Inspections…
https://bolenreport.com/hillary-clinton-personally-arranged-chinese-vaccine-manufacturers-avoid-us-government-scrutiny/


Graham: There Will Not Be Funding for W.H.O. in Next Appropriations Bill

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/04/08/graham-there-will-not-be-funding-for-w-h-o-in-next-appropriations-bill/

William Branham False Prophet

https://fightthenewage.blogspot.com/2020/03/william-branham-false-prophet.html

Revelation Definitely Written AD 96 not earlier

Jackson, Wayne. "When Was the Book of Revelation Written?" ChristianCourier.com. Access date: March 8, 2020. https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/1552-when-was-the-book-of-revelation-written

An effort is made by preterists and scholars after 1831
to date Revelation as early, and all in it come to pass
already. External and internal evidence shows it was
written late.

The sections that cover John's time to near future and now
are Rev. chapters 1-6, with part of the latter unfulfilled
but the context for it is lining up.

The article shows that the attempt to interpret Nero
as the antichrist "is possible only by pursuing the most irresponsible form of exegesis.

To come up with such an interpretation one must:

1. add the title “Caesar” to Nero’s name;
2. compute the letter-number arrangement on the basis of Hebrew, whereas the book was written in Greek; and
3. alter the spelling of “Caesar” by dropping the yodh in the Hebrew.

All of this reveals a truly desperate attempt to find a reference to Nero in the text.

Additionally, Leon Morris has pointed out that Irenaeus discussed a number of possibilities for deciphering the 666, but he did not even include Nero in his list, let alone regard this as a likely conjecture (1980, 38). Noted critic Theodor Zahn observed that Nero was not even suggested as a possibility until the year 1831 (447)."

What kind of govenment is biblical?

Does Christianity support monarchism? There are those 

especially in Eastern Orthodoxy and in Roman Catholicism 

who are monarchists. Jay Dyer makes a case for this. 

But as one protestant on a radio show said decades ago, 

contrary to those who argue for democracy as the only 

way, that the Bible doesn't mandate any one form of 

government.

Orthodox sometimes might answer that we should go 

by tradition which was developed mostly in monarchial 

contexts, including the Byzantine empire, and that the 

Bible is to be read allegorically aka spiritually. But the 

ORthodox tradition on the latter is that spiritual applications 

of Scripture do not replace or negate the historical literal 

statements of Scripture.

And in the days of the Mosaic Covenant, initially they had 

no king, YHWH was king and the top ruler of the people 

was in effect His prime minister. Initially this was Moses, 

the prophet and lawgiver who led them, replaced by 

Joshua who Moses appointed to take over after him, at 

God's command. Thereafter they were ruled by "judges" 

sopetim to judge, govern, rule, punish, to decide controversy 

https://biblehub.com/parallel/judges/2-16.htm these were 

raised up by God and were not hereditary rulers. When the 

people eventually demanded to have a king, God said this 

was a kind of rebellion against Him, but gave them a king, 

first Saul then David and his lineage. Before this in 

Deuteronomy anticipating such a move, God gave rules 

for the king they would have when they had one.

So you see monarchs on earth were not God's initial 

provision, but rulers who operated under God. They were 

somewhat like dictators, but they were not hereditary. 

God was the King. And when Jesus Christ comes back, 

He will be King forever on earth. "of His Kingdom there 

shall be no end" says the Creed.

it is a mistake however to view this sort of kingless state 

as without government, tribal councils and leaders are a 

form of government, the judges were a form of government 

resembling a king in power over all the people and tribes, 

but not hereditary, and eventually there were kings.

Judges starts and ends with the statement that there was 

no king in Israel and every man did as was right in his own 

eyes, and the result was repeated disaster of one sort or 

another. Under the kings, however, if the king was corrupt 

or apostate there was still trouble. no form of government 

is a guarantee of godliness and right operation socially or 

economically or politically. Some idiot right winger once 

cited this as supporting his semi anarchistic extremely 

limited ideal of government, but in context it doesn't do so 

but negates the value of this.

As shown in the Bible, having monarchy does not solve 

problems if the monarch is not righteous. and being 

hereditary you can't get rid of a bad family. The present 

claimants to old thrones are all or mostly eurotrash some 

outright perverts and some into occultism. These have 

all been alleged of the British royal family and definitely 

indicated here and there among other defunct ruling 

families whether royal or duchy. Even the last Tsar of 

Russia was dabbling in dubious stuff, an occultist he was 

persuaded by the Church to dump, followed by Rasputin 

who was just as bad but more presentable initially. and 

was interested in Tibetan buddhism probably because of 

its fasting and apparent wonder working at times. Russians 

in general, according to one priest of the time, had 

succumbed to a kind of dreamy state and dual faith was 

something present enough to have to be fought. Even the 

placing of icons on the altar to bless them and take them 

home became prohibited so occultists weren't using this 

either to abuse them or perhaps keep a lid on what could 

go wrong when messing with magic. Some of this influence 

was local holdover pagan practices, some came into Russia 

with the French influence and Tsar PEter the Great's efforts 

at modernization.

Until Christ comes back, something largely ignored by 

Orthodox but stated in the Creed, the best government would 

be something that limits government power while allowing its 

intervention to stop various evils God has denounced, 

including economic ones, has transparency (which makes a 

free press not infected with government agents essential), and 

very few unaccountable unelected people of power 

(deep state) such as the vipers that have made up the 

American state department for generations. And whose top

rulers are replaceable by peaceable means and not hereditary.

a king's role includes correction of evils that develop, and 

therefore it is a proper role of government. The Law of Moses 

included non negotiable commands to engage in charity, incl. 

effectively the confiscation for the levites and the poor in 

general of the third year's tithe, and prohibition on harvesting 

the edges of your land, or going over your land in harvest to 

get what you missed, these were for the poor to take. 

(gleaning, a modern equivalent is dumpster diving).

So in general, the best analysis of any government type or 

action is not does it fit libertarian, communist, fascist, oligarchic 

or whatever ideal or ideology you are judging by, but in each 

matter does it fit with the Bible or not?

Some things conservatives are upset about are indeed ungodly. 

Other things are not, and in fact more constitutionally consistant 

than not.

Disney occultism

https://fightthenewage.blogspot.com/2020/02/disney-occultism.html