MGTOW or Men Going Their Own Way and the "manosphere" male oriented blogs, range from the monk mode, celibate to pick up artists or PUA both of whom (the latter hypocritically) denounce girls who are THOTs (that hoe aka whore over there) for different reasons, the former call the latter not
really MGTOW because still engaging with women instead of avoiding them altogether.
Among both you find concerns about women who have slept around ("ridden the cock carousel")
and no longer can bond with a man by way of emotions stirred by sex, actually more by petting
and affection and snuggling and THEN sex, and some of the men refer to bonding with women
the same way.
But among the apologists for the double standard are those who argue that evolutionary wiring
make the sexes radically different sexually, and that women respond to oxytocin and men don't
but to rational considerations to stay with a woman or two or three of them.
oxytocin is a chemical that plays a role in pleasure based pair bonding. this is a far more complex
thing than genetics or whatever. in experiments with voles, untreated males are monogamous,
but an oxytocin blocker injected will render the male promiscuous.
lately two different universities or a university and a lab did autopsies on aged women's brains,
and found that 63% of them had male DNA present. there are four ways this can happen, listed
below in the post I put on a youtube comments section part of a dispute with someone way too
sure of himself, justifying being a sleazebag. (or male slut.) there is a fifth way, chimerism
which can if the absorbed embryo was opposite sex to the absorbing embryo, result in intersex
or hermaphroditic conditions.
anyway, one way is absorption of male DNA through mucous membranes (vagina or mouth)
into the blood and into the brain. Nothing has established this affects behavior, bonding or
anything, but the slop job pseudoscientific armchair jumpers to conclusions argue that this is
the mechanism why women bond to a man, but a man doesn't bond to one woman, and that if
she has had several sex partners, well, the more she has had the less able she is to bond ergo
the more likely to cheat.
a nonsequitur if ever there was one.
Also ignores extensive evidence of male bonding to female back of regular exposure to her,
sexual and parasexual and emotional before touching even, and even in a prostitution
situation: I read somewhere that several times in Vietnam a soldier would go to a particular
prostitute he favored over others too often, and end up marrying her. she'd come home as a
war bride.
Also the penis mucous membranes inside would be just as permeable, and it is usually a few
minutes before ejaculate can come down the tube and flush things out. plenty of time for
absorption. And if this wasn't happening, there wouldn't be any STDs gotten by men from
women!
Another line of thought is that spines or other oddities on penises in animals, and the
coronal bulge at the tip of the human penis, are designed to scoop out semen of previous
males, thus arguing for inherent promiscuity of both sexes. IT NEVER CROSSES
THEIR MINDS THAT THESE ARE DESIGNED FOR THE FEMALE'S PLEASURE.
not to mention that it wouldn't scoop it all but even push some farther up into the womb,
and the time frame between matings with different males would render this effort
useless to prevent impregnation by the previous male.
of course the poster drags up fall of civilization being relatable to female infidelity.
a. you can't have female infidelity and promiscuity without male infidelity and promiscuity. b. talk about mixing lies with truth, and you can't be bothered to go search or don't want to so I will do the work for you. like I said, the male DNA in brains can be from male pregnancies also. on that basis, the more sons the less likely she is to remain faithful to their father by your logic.
"Known as microchimerism [Mc], the presence of male cells in the bodies of females is not new and is usually caused by cells from a male fetus from a prior pregnancy.“The idea of two genetically distinct populations of cells, or their DNA, residing in one individual isn’t new. It’s called microchimerism,” PLOS ONE wrote in a blog post in 2012. “Medical chimerism arises after a transfusion or transplant, and it may follow pregnancy. Our microbiomes, the bacteria within us, are more like guests than body parts.”" https://globalnews.ca/news/3558598/no-women-do-not-absorb-and-retain-dna-from-every-man-they-have-sex-with/
though the article casts doubt on sex as the origin I don't doubt it, but pregnancies and fraternal twins are a source also, AND ONLY 63% of women had this " The study, which was focused on the female brain and genetics, found that 63% of women have brains that harbor DNA that originated from another individual,"
https://mtonews.com/shock-report-women-absorb-retain-dna-every-man-unprotected-sx-genetically-bonded-forever
"So according to the scientists, the possible sources of the male DNA cells living in the women’s brains are:1. An abortion the woman didn’t know about.2. A male twin that vanished.3. An older brother transferred by the maternal circulation.4. Sexual intercourse. " https://periscopeolawole.blogspot.com/2017/07/women-absorb-and-retain-dna-from-every.html sex is only one of four ways this can happen. some of this can happen due to blood transfusions
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/04/transplanttransfusion-donors-dna-get-integrated-new-host/
meanwhile the fact that unprotected sex can give a man an STD from a woman shows that the penis' mucous membranes inside the tip get exposure to and absorption of female mucous and fluid (the former for sure will have DNA in it) for several minutes before the ejaculation can clear anything out. I await results of similar DNA searches in male brain autopsies.
bottom line, you are jumping to conclusions and so is anyone who associates this with bonding. you are ignoring the male reports of their bonding to women, the social and media heavy influence against male to female bonding and scorn towards love and clinging by either this mostly trained into men,
