Sunday, July 15, 2018
Of COURSE Mueller INDICTS 12 Russian military officers for 2016 election meddling just DAYS before Trump meets Putin
Special counsel Robert Mueller claims to be investigating a ‘conspiracy’ between members of POTUS Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government. What is truly sickening about it is that he’s one of them actually in on a conspiracy — to undermine our duly-elected president.
On Friday, another co-conspirator, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein, announced that Mueller has indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for allegedly meddling in the 2016 election.
And this comes just a few days before Monday’s face-to-face meeting in Helsinki between POTUS Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Timing is everything, right?
...
The disgusting Deep State’s military-industrial complex can’t have peace with Russia and China because it would wither and lose its power and influence. Much better to remain on a hair-trigger nuclear status with both countries so we can blow each to bits someday!
As for the indictment, Mueller can’t seriously believe that Putin is going to surrender 12 of his GRU officers to the United States for a sham trial…does he? Because he didn’t believe that 13 other Russians he indicted earlier were going to fight back in court — until they did. Discovery in that case is ongoing.
How do we know this is bogus? Let us count the ways:
#1 - WikiLeaks founder and editor Julian Assange has said repeatedly that Russia did not hack the DNC’s emails and has even promised to provide evidence of same in exchange for a pardon. Assange and WikiLeaks have never been proven wrong or to have lied.
#2 - A group of former U.S. intelligence officials including some former NSA agents has said they have examined the cyber-forensic evidence and have concluded that the DNC servers were not hacked. What’s more, the DNC has never allowed its servers to be examined by the FBI’s cyber-forensics team; so how can Mueller know that “Russian officers” hacked them?
#3 - Philip Giraldi, a former CIA counterterrorism expert, military officer and recognized intelligence authority, in a December 2016 Facebook post, said there is “no evidence” to support the Obama administration accusation Russia was involved in the DNC ‘hack.’ He wrote that “apart from assertions of Russian activity connected to an unnamed political party, [the report] provides absolutely no evidence that the alleged intrusions into the DNC servers were anything beyond normal intelligence agency probing for vulnerabilities.” “In fact,” he adds, “it doesn’t even provide the evidence for that.”
#4 - The Russian “counterintelligence” investigation into the Trump campaign was bogus. It was based on a phony “dossier” that came in three different versions — none of which have been substantiated.
#5 - Never forget that James Comey leaked classified memos in order to trigger Mueller’s appointment. The whole thing was a set-up; Hillary Clinton is the real criminal here but she was exonerated so she could remain in the race and ‘beat Donald Trump’ — or so everyone thought.
That Jeff Sessions has allowed this clown show to continue is a disgrace. Like POTUS Trump said, a make-believe probe which is wasting tens of millions of taxpayer dollars is also preventing our president from pursuing his vision of foreign policy, which is his right. As we have noted, that’s a national security threat.
At least he’s not trying to enrich a terrorist-supporting regime (Iran) while making “deals” that will someday lead it to nuclear weapons.
Someday the guilty will be made to pay. And POTUS Trump won’t be among them because the only thing he’s done is dare to run for the presidency…and win.
http://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/07/13/of-course-mueller-indicts-12-russian-military-officers-for-2016-election-meddling-just-days-before-trump-meets-putin/
----
http://strategic-culture.org/news/2018/07/13/globalist-elite-fears-peace-wants-war.html
----
http://www.sgtreport.com/2018/07/war-is-a-racket-and-so-is-the-state/
Saturday, July 7, 2018
Proverbs 31:10 et seq
The Virtuous Woman (or valorous, excellent, of noble character)
Proverbs 31:10-30 totally wrecks the unbiblical notions of what women should be like, and what a man
should find acceptable. An awful lot of what is taught as "biblical" is just baptized sin. Pride, ambition,
vainglory, dishonesty, cowardice, self indulgence are all denounced everywhere else, but get a free pass
if they are linked to women or men as part of their supposed created nature.
The Masoretic based KJV and others, and the Septuagint (LXX) from older texts than the Masoretic differ
slightly, but add up to the same thing.
"11The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.
12She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life." no need of or temptation to dubioius
or wrong means of making money, involvement in pluder, or evenjust the results of the warfare
of business and the marketplace.
The Septuagint "Theheart ofher husband trusts in her she will not be at a loss forfine
spoils, FOR SHE PROVIDES GOOD THINGS FOR HER HUSBAND ALL HER LIFE."
Hereit is clear as implied in the Masoretic, that she is one who brings home the bread a lot,
theone who comes home with the spoils of the competition of the marketplace. (The Talmud
saysthe text the Masoretics based on was flawed when they got it, they just froze it from more
errors. The Qumran Scrolls often agree with the LXX against the Masoretic,s omketimes a third
variantisshown to have exited, but they all add up to the same thing.
"13She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.
14She is like the merchants' ships; she bringeth her food from afar.
...
16She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.
[aggressive independent farming savvy businesswoman.]
17She girdeth her loins with strength, and strengtheneth her arms.
[very masculine terminology here. Likely does a lot of her own field work, nothing
unusual in itself for women in some parts of Asia and Africa.]
18She perceiveth that her merchandise is good: her candle goeth not out by night.
[keeps track of finances and profit and loss not an airhead.]
19She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff.
...
24She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.
25Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.
26She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.
[LXX says she is kind to her kids so they become rich, i.e., not torn down or smothered
but built up to get out and things done, incl. the females are raised this way since
it doesn't specify sons.]"
Notice that her husband is proud of her and he is also well known sits with the elders
in the cfity gates, soshe is well known also.
Somuch for man the provider woman the housekeeper dependent and manipulator.
And theidea that remarriage was allowed because a woman couldn't survive without
marrying for money is also false.
Proverbs 31:10-30 totally wrecks the unbiblical notions of what women should be like, and what a man
should find acceptable. An awful lot of what is taught as "biblical" is just baptized sin. Pride, ambition,
vainglory, dishonesty, cowardice, self indulgence are all denounced everywhere else, but get a free pass
if they are linked to women or men as part of their supposed created nature.
The Masoretic based KJV and others, and the Septuagint (LXX) from older texts than the Masoretic differ
slightly, but add up to the same thing.
"11The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.
12She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life." no need of or temptation to dubioius
or wrong means of making money, involvement in pluder, or evenjust the results of the warfare
of business and the marketplace.
The Septuagint "Theheart ofher husband trusts in her she will not be at a loss forfine
spoils, FOR SHE PROVIDES GOOD THINGS FOR HER HUSBAND ALL HER LIFE."
Hereit is clear as implied in the Masoretic, that she is one who brings home the bread a lot,
theone who comes home with the spoils of the competition of the marketplace. (The Talmud
saysthe text the Masoretics based on was flawed when they got it, they just froze it from more
errors. The Qumran Scrolls often agree with the LXX against the Masoretic,s omketimes a third
variantisshown to have exited, but they all add up to the same thing.
"13She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.
14She is like the merchants' ships; she bringeth her food from afar.
...
16She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.
[aggressive independent farming savvy businesswoman.]
17She girdeth her loins with strength, and strengtheneth her arms.
[very masculine terminology here. Likely does a lot of her own field work, nothing
unusual in itself for women in some parts of Asia and Africa.]
18She perceiveth that her merchandise is good: her candle goeth not out by night.
[keeps track of finances and profit and loss not an airhead.]
19She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff.
...
24She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.
25Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.
26She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.
[LXX says she is kind to her kids so they become rich, i.e., not torn down or smothered
but built up to get out and things done, incl. the females are raised this way since
it doesn't specify sons.]"
Notice that her husband is proud of her and he is also well known sits with the elders
in the cfity gates, soshe is well known also.
Somuch for man the provider woman the housekeeper dependent and manipulator.
And theidea that remarriage was allowed because a woman couldn't survive without
marrying for money is also false.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)