I oppose abortion, perversion, sexism support govt. intervention w. limits I think outside the box. Eastern Orthodox but against Serbian cultic nationalism and imperialism. THIS SITE MAY USE COOKIES AND I CAN'T MAKE ANYTHING WORK TO GIVE YOU A CHOICE USE AT YOUR OWN RISK I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE COOKIES OR NOT.
Monday, February 25, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
Bigfoot and Almas plus human hybrids
http://www.isogg.org/ancientdna.htm
"Zana and Khwit
DNA extracted from skulls purported to be Zana, and her son,
"Zana and Khwit
DNA extracted from skulls purported to be Zana, and her son,
Khwit, were profiled on the National Geographic Channel show
to answer was whether the supposed "Almas", were really
Neanderthals who survived into modern times. Mitochondrial
DNA analyzed from both skulls confirms a shared maternal
line ancestor of human origins, with no Neanderthal mutations."
But this is ONLY the mitochondrial DNA which runs on the
female side only. Nothing can explain Zana's unusual strength,
though her behavior might be explained as being a feral human,
raised by an animal, but what animal?
If Zana was herself a hybrid and not a fullblood Almas and her
mother was human, then of course the mtDNA will show as
strictly human.
The same article argues no Neanderthal mtDNA in modern man,
so no Neanderthal interbreeding with us, but nuclear DNA has
shown this is not the case, and nuclear DNA testing on Zana
could show something odd. Apparently this was not done.
The scientist who reviewed the scans of the skulls commented
that Zana's skull has a modern back to it, not Neanderthal, but
if she was a hybrid herself this might be explainable as due to
her human blood.
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/zana.htm
Zana's story.
http://sasquatch-pg.net/hybrids.html
sasquatch hybrid boy not unusually large but otherwise
odd, extremely smart and could read other card players
became affluent, married and had children.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Shattering the Myths of Darwinism
severe problems with dating but this guy doesn't argue young Earth
only that it is substantially less than 4 1/2 billion years old. Uranium
decays to lead, but also to radioactive helium and the amounts
give radically different ages 400,000 years in the latter case. Argues
the material the Earth is made of might be 4 1/2 billion years old,
but that doesn't say when the Earth formed.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
high points of starchild difference from human
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)