Immortal words

"congressmen should be held to a higher ethical standard than perverts."
Jon Stewart Mar. 26, AD 2010

Nanotech serious health hazards

I knew this could happen when I first heard of nanotech
in the early 1990s. I emailed a scientist who didn't answer,
this point. Those little machines you want to put in people,
are also chemicals. Just what, as chemicals, are they
going to do in the human body, eh?

Now I was thinking of possible unplanned molecular
interaction of a non mechanical but more standard
chemical style of these molecules.

But this threat is a more viable one, that nanotubes can
act like asbestos in the lungs, and being so tiny can travel
into the blood stream and into the liver and brain, and that
nanoized titanium dioxide is toxic (closer to my original
worry).

Herbivorous crocodilians

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocodylomorpha

This is an early croc ancestor, who was apparently herbivorous or omnivorous
at most. Evidence of non carnivore ancestry for carnivores?

The 9-11 Truther Movement

This seems to be what I call a mixed bag of tricks. Aside from

likely infiltration either to watch for dangerous sorts developing

within it, or to stymie it altogether, or other reasons, there

seem lately to be cultist types getting into the game, but aside

from all this, there are two general forms.

 

One goes into all manner of detail about how the planes

couldn't have taken down the buildings (wrong, you don't need

to melt only weaken steel for it to sag, slip from the points it

was attached to and start pancaking), throw in Bldg. 7

being taken down on purpose (probably true), mention in

passing that Bush knew about all this, and then focus on the

issue of explosives etc.

 

The other focusses on the more important question of what

Bush knew and when, the whole unsavory set of associations

incl. Bush and the Bin Laden family and holdover Nazi heirs

and assigns surrounding all this, and the profiteering by the

CIA connected firms and others who, trading on inside

knowledge of what was about to happen, got rich in stock

trades that worked only because certain companies were

negatively impacted by 9-11.

 

The former is what we hear about all the time. That bunch

of arguments seems to drown the other stuff out.

 

I wonder if that is entirely accidental.

 

Because it really doesn't matter if additional explosives were

involved or not.

 

What matters is the parapolitical milieu this happened in,

and was the product of.

 

By the way, that nonsense about the Pentagon and a missile,

there were eyewitnesses to a plane, the hole is only 16 feet

wide at the ground and looks a lot bigger than that farther up,

and as someone pointed out, these planes are rather fragile,

they disintegrate in that kind of situation real easy.

 

Mike Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon" and Alex Constantine's

research that continues where Mae Brussell and Dave Emory

leaves off, would be good to study. Google them.