Tuesday, March 1, 2016

before "paul" can follow dan bryan's lead and delete....

16 comments:

  1. Oh how sorely missed you must feel at Constance's blog. Not to worry!
    ReplyDelete
  2. Christine,

    Sorry for having been tough at points but we're all exacerbated with you over at Constance's. Do the Christian thing for us and yourself but most of all for Constance's sake, and don't come back.

    Thanks, Paul.
    ReplyDelete
  3. Yawn!You're the one causing worthwhile bloggers such as Rich in Medford to leave with your constant strawmen, ad hominems, et al! Give us all a break and do the decent thing: don't come back so we can all breathe freely again!

    Bye.
    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.
    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't do strawmen I hit at the core of issues. I don't do ad hominem, I notice patterns of behavior.
    ReplyDelete
  6. You're kidding yourself! Rich picked you up on exactly those points: you are busted! Chakras, aliens, res seers, etc.... Noone takes you seriously. Do yourself a favor and seek help. Don't come back!
    ReplyDelete
  7. most of the time I don't post about those things unless there is a very good reason to do so. but I have a fan in the northeast who talks to me on the phone sometimes, he said that the people on Constance's blog some of them are nasty and that they hate me because I am way over their heads. I am hesitant to accept that explanation. And Rich didn't pick me up on anything. I think he turned a general statement (that I should perhaps have specified as general) into a personal one.
    And you people bitch about what you just mentioned no matter what I post or how long its been.

    And that idiot whether it was you or another asking last year or so if I was ready to repent for preaching Hinduism - you don't know shit about Hinduism. you could study the Vedic form polytheist, or the upanishadic which vendanta comes from and never hear about energy bodies or chakras. that is from tantra, which is a kind of technology of how to royaly screw yourself paranormally up.


    latest post of his however is interesting. It tends to support my suspicion that this refugee thing is part of a long plan to restore the Nazis to power since their street version is the only thing that can stop these jihadis, and the ones already secretly in power can consolidate it. The move to more strongly unify Europe is a step in that direction.

    The EU origin is Nazi post war planning. First, how they intended to run things once they won, and once they lost how to gain control.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Are you for real?
    ReplyDelete
  9. yes I'm for real. But I am not sure if you are referring to one or more or all of my remarks.

    If it is about the EU and Nazis, you have only to wait and see. and while you are waiting, study the background on the EU, and the Bilderbergers, and some of the research links on the sidebar here.
    ReplyDelete
  10. I think I'll pass... I wouldn't be shocked if Sherry Schreiner takes top spot for you. The less mumbo jumbo mumbling bumbling bamboozle from you the better!
    ReplyDelete
  11. Sherry Shriner has issues. And I came to my conclusions without her help. Like most in the conspiracy and aliens and whatnot field she has only part of the picture and usually the wrong part plays a big role. I can't remember much about her didn't read her stuff that much, except there were at least two glaring problems.
    ReplyDelete
  12. One glaring problem is your misspelling of 'weird'. The word is obviously a little too close to home for you, Ms. Beam-her-up Scotty'!
    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=A0SO8x7..nVWbBQAnCdXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEyYnBvZXZkBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDQjEzMjRfMQRzZWMDc3I-?qid=20081201172054AAPmDgN&p=wierd%20spelling

      someone complained weird was the wrong spelling so I used the wi spelling.
      Delete
  13. Hope this helps, do take good care now!

    http://psychcentral.com/
    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that shallow site is the best you can come up with? I'm used to reading Psychology Today 20 years ago and the DSM and the more readable kinds of clinician articles.
      Delete

No comments:

Post a Comment